Quantitative Verification and Synthesis of Attack-Defence Scenarios

Zaruhi Aslanyan, F. Nielson, D. Parker
{"title":"Quantitative Verification and Synthesis of Attack-Defence Scenarios","authors":"Zaruhi Aslanyan, F. Nielson, D. Parker","doi":"10.1109/CSF.2016.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attack-defence trees are a powerful technique for formally evaluating attack-defence scenarios. They represent in an intuitive, graphical way the interaction between an attacker and a defender who compete in order to achieve conflicting objectives. We propose a novel framework for the formal analysis of quantitative properties of complex attack-defence scenarios, using an extension of attack-defence trees which models temporal ordering of actions and allows explicit dependencies in the strategies adopted by attackers and defenders. We adopt a game-theoretic approach, translating attack-defence trees to two-player stochastic games, and then employ probabilistic model checking techniques to formally analyse these models. This provides a means to both verify formally specified security properties of the attack-defence scenarios and, dually, to synthesise strategies for attackers or defenders which guarantee or optimise some quantitative property, such as the probability of a successful attack, the expected cost incurred, or some multi-objective trade-off between the two. We implement our approach, building upon the PRISM-games model checker, and apply it to a case study of an RFID goods management system.","PeriodicalId":6500,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 29th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)","volume":"8 1","pages":"105-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 29th Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2016.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

Abstract

Attack-defence trees are a powerful technique for formally evaluating attack-defence scenarios. They represent in an intuitive, graphical way the interaction between an attacker and a defender who compete in order to achieve conflicting objectives. We propose a novel framework for the formal analysis of quantitative properties of complex attack-defence scenarios, using an extension of attack-defence trees which models temporal ordering of actions and allows explicit dependencies in the strategies adopted by attackers and defenders. We adopt a game-theoretic approach, translating attack-defence trees to two-player stochastic games, and then employ probabilistic model checking techniques to formally analyse these models. This provides a means to both verify formally specified security properties of the attack-defence scenarios and, dually, to synthesise strategies for attackers or defenders which guarantee or optimise some quantitative property, such as the probability of a successful attack, the expected cost incurred, or some multi-objective trade-off between the two. We implement our approach, building upon the PRISM-games model checker, and apply it to a case study of an RFID goods management system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
攻防场景的定量验证与综合
攻击-防御树是正式评估攻击-防御场景的强大技术。它们以直观的图形方式呈现了攻击者和防御者之间的互动,他们为了实现相互冲突的目标而相互竞争。我们提出了一个新的框架,用于形式化分析复杂攻击防御场景的定量属性,使用攻击防御树的扩展,该扩展模拟了行动的时间顺序,并允许攻击者和防御者采用的策略中显式的依赖关系。我们采用博弈论的方法,将攻防树转化为双玩家随机博弈,然后使用概率模型检查技术对这些模型进行形式化分析。这提供了一种方法,既可以验证攻击-防御场景的正式指定的安全属性,又可以为攻击者或防御者提供综合策略,保证或优化某些定量属性,例如成功攻击的概率,预期成本,或两者之间的一些多目标权衡。我们在PRISM-games模型检查器的基础上实现了我们的方法,并将其应用于RFID货物管理系统的案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Axioms for Information Leakage Multi-run Side-Channel Analysis Using Symbolic Execution and Max-SMT sElect: A Lightweight Verifiable Remote Voting System Automated Reasoning for Equivalences in the Applied Pi Calculus with Barriers On Modular and Fully-Abstract Compilation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1