"Historiography on the Ground": Provocations on Inca and Nahua "Youth" in El primer nueva corónica y buen gobierno (1615) and the Florentine Codex (1577)

MLN bulletin Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/mln.2022.0012
Ann De León, Lauren G. J. Reynolds
{"title":"\"Historiography on the Ground\": Provocations on Inca and Nahua \"Youth\" in El primer nueva corónica y buen gobierno (1615) and the Florentine Codex (1577)","authors":"Ann De León, Lauren G. J. Reynolds","doi":"10.1353/mln.2022.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In her book, The Narrow Pass of Our Nerves: Writing, Coloniality, and Postcolonial Theory, Sara Castro-Klarén describes the practices of “historiography on the ground” as a series of discursive steps taken by the Viceroy Francisco de Toledo and other Spanish coloniz-ers in order to systematically “deauthorize[e]… local [Indigenous] knowledges” (158). Castro-Klarén describes this three step process as including: 1) first a “systematic gathering of ‘facts’” as “result[ing from] ‘observations’ conducted by Spanish agents of the Crown who decoded the observed cultural practices” in the context of their own (European) “cultural matrix” rather than in light of an Indigenous “grid of signification” (157); 2) the subsequent resolution of “confu-sion, disjunction, and contradiction” through various translational processes (157–58); and 3) a final reading, re-casting and taming of contemporary Indigenous realities through the framework of “‘Greek and Roman antiquity’ in order to estrange Indigenous discourses of","PeriodicalId":78454,"journal":{"name":"MLN bulletin","volume":"210 1","pages":"290 - 310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MLN bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mln.2022.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In her book, The Narrow Pass of Our Nerves: Writing, Coloniality, and Postcolonial Theory, Sara Castro-Klarén describes the practices of “historiography on the ground” as a series of discursive steps taken by the Viceroy Francisco de Toledo and other Spanish coloniz-ers in order to systematically “deauthorize[e]… local [Indigenous] knowledges” (158). Castro-Klarén describes this three step process as including: 1) first a “systematic gathering of ‘facts’” as “result[ing from] ‘observations’ conducted by Spanish agents of the Crown who decoded the observed cultural practices” in the context of their own (European) “cultural matrix” rather than in light of an Indigenous “grid of signification” (157); 2) the subsequent resolution of “confu-sion, disjunction, and contradiction” through various translational processes (157–58); and 3) a final reading, re-casting and taming of contemporary Indigenous realities through the framework of “‘Greek and Roman antiquity’ in order to estrange Indigenous discourses of
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《地球上的史学》:《第一个新科林斯和善治》(1615年)和《佛罗伦萨抄本》(1577年)中对印加和纳瓦“青年”的挑战
在她的书《我们神经的狭窄通道:写作、殖民与后殖民理论》中,Sara castro - klarsamin将“实地史学”的实践描述为总督Francisco de Toledo和其他西班牙殖民者为了系统地“剥夺[e]…当地[原住民]知识”而采取的一系列话语步骤。castro - klarmachan将这三个步骤的过程描述为:1)首先是“系统地收集‘事实’”,这是“西班牙王室代理人进行的‘观察’的结果”,他们在自己的(欧洲)“文化矩阵”的背景下,而不是根据土著的“意义网格”(157)来解码观察到的文化习俗;2)随后通过各种翻译过程解决“混淆、脱节和矛盾”(157-58);3)通过“希腊和罗马古代”的框架,对当代土著现实进行最后的解读、重新塑造和驯服,以疏远土著话语
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Note Keeping Company: Phenomenologies of Perception “Wait a Minute”: Reflections on [the] Pause Is Existence Intelligible? Frederick Douglass and the Black Infrahuman Surreal: A Story of Origins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1