Interest Articulation and Lobbying in Unregulated Legal Contexts: The Case of Albania

IF 1.1 Q3 ECONOMICS Terra Economicus Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.58944/uckf7388
Gerti Sqapi
{"title":"Interest Articulation and Lobbying in Unregulated Legal Contexts: The Case of Albania","authors":"Gerti Sqapi","doi":"10.58944/uckf7388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main argument of this paper is that the legal regulation of lobbying is an important factor for disciplining/curbing the undue (illicit) influence of different interests’ groups on the political-making process, especially in countries with post-communist and nonconsolidated democracies as Albania. In three decades of political and economic transition from a one-party communist system to a democratic one and towards a market economy, the democratization of Albania has faced various problems, which have often led to a loss of public confidence in the political class and apathy of citizens towards the political system. In many cases, this has come as a result of the perception or even the disclosure by the media and the public of corruption scandals, political clientelism, or undue influences in the decision-making processes in Albania. Surely, it can be said that political scandals of trading or exercising illicit influences on public officials can affect, as numerous cases have shown, every democratic political system in the world. However, they are more likely to occur in new democracies (post-communist) countries that face weak state structures and a legal environment that is not yet well consolidated and where a culture of informality exists alongside written rules and laws. For this purpose, that of disciplining and controlling the influences that specific interests exert on the decision-making process of governments, legislatures, or other regulatory agencies, a good part of European countries have considered undertaking legal regulatory initiatives for lobbying activity in their environments.","PeriodicalId":44272,"journal":{"name":"Terra Economicus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Terra Economicus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58944/uckf7388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main argument of this paper is that the legal regulation of lobbying is an important factor for disciplining/curbing the undue (illicit) influence of different interests’ groups on the political-making process, especially in countries with post-communist and nonconsolidated democracies as Albania. In three decades of political and economic transition from a one-party communist system to a democratic one and towards a market economy, the democratization of Albania has faced various problems, which have often led to a loss of public confidence in the political class and apathy of citizens towards the political system. In many cases, this has come as a result of the perception or even the disclosure by the media and the public of corruption scandals, political clientelism, or undue influences in the decision-making processes in Albania. Surely, it can be said that political scandals of trading or exercising illicit influences on public officials can affect, as numerous cases have shown, every democratic political system in the world. However, they are more likely to occur in new democracies (post-communist) countries that face weak state structures and a legal environment that is not yet well consolidated and where a culture of informality exists alongside written rules and laws. For this purpose, that of disciplining and controlling the influences that specific interests exert on the decision-making process of governments, legislatures, or other regulatory agencies, a good part of European countries have considered undertaking legal regulatory initiatives for lobbying activity in their environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无管制法律背景下的利益表达与游说:阿尔巴尼亚案例
本文的主要论点是,对游说的法律规制是约束/遏制不同利益集团对政治决策过程的不当(非法)影响的重要因素,特别是在阿尔巴尼亚等后共产主义和非巩固民主国家。在从一党共产主义制度向民主制度和向市场经济的政治和经济过渡的三十年中,阿尔巴尼亚的民主化遇到了各种问题,这些问题往往导致公众对政治阶层失去信心,公民对政治制度漠不关心。在许多情况下,这是由于媒体和公众对阿尔巴尼亚的腐败丑闻、政治裙带关系或在决策过程中受到不当影响的看法,甚至是披露的结果。当然,可以这样说,交易或对公职人员施加非法影响的政治丑闻可以影响到世界上每一个民主政治制度,正如许多案例所表明的那样。然而,它们更有可能发生在新兴民主国家(后共产主义),这些国家面临着薄弱的国家结构和尚未很好巩固的法律环境,以及与书面规则和法律并存的非正式文化。为此目的,即为了约束和控制特定利益集团对政府、立法机构或其他管理机构的决策过程施加的影响,相当一部分欧洲国家已考虑在其环境中对游说活动采取法律监管举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Terra Economicus
Terra Economicus ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Exploring brand equity assessment within consumer perception. Case of the jeans industry Elasticity of demand for forestry products in macro-regions of Russia: Models to forecast sector development Income distribution and economic growth in Finland: Applying Bhaduri – Marglin model The myth of Leviathan: A new interpretation by a British historian. Reflections on Mark Harrison’s Secret Leviathan: Secrecy and State Capacity under Soviet Communism Sustainable organizational development and human capital in the context of soft systems methodology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1