Shame among Forensic and Non-Forensic Patients and the Impact of the Social Determinants of Health: A Pilot Study

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI:10.1080/24732850.2021.2016115
Rusan Lateef, Fiona Moloney, Amina Ali, Roland M. Jones
{"title":"Shame among Forensic and Non-Forensic Patients and the Impact of the Social Determinants of Health: A Pilot Study","authors":"Rusan Lateef, Fiona Moloney, Amina Ali, Roland M. Jones","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.2016115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Shame is associated with various mental health and social difficulties. A broad range of social factors increase the risk of shame among individuals. One group that experiences increased shame due to their mental health diagnoses and criminal justice involvement is forensic patients. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare shame levels in forensic and non-forensic patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, and to examine whether any social determinants of health impacted the levels of shame among both groups. A self-report shame questionnaire and a measure of experiences with various social determinants of health were completed by 43 patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder (22 forensic and 21 non-forensic patients). Statistical analyses revealed no significant differences in levels of shame between the forensic and non-forensic patients. Early life experience as well as employment and working conditions had the most significant impact on shame levels for both forensic and non-forensic patients. We also found a significant difference between forensic and non-forensic scores in employment and working conditions (p = .046), with forensic patients rating their experiences with this factor as more positive than non-forensic participants. Clinical implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.2016115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Shame is associated with various mental health and social difficulties. A broad range of social factors increase the risk of shame among individuals. One group that experiences increased shame due to their mental health diagnoses and criminal justice involvement is forensic patients. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare shame levels in forensic and non-forensic patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, and to examine whether any social determinants of health impacted the levels of shame among both groups. A self-report shame questionnaire and a measure of experiences with various social determinants of health were completed by 43 patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder (22 forensic and 21 non-forensic patients). Statistical analyses revealed no significant differences in levels of shame between the forensic and non-forensic patients. Early life experience as well as employment and working conditions had the most significant impact on shame levels for both forensic and non-forensic patients. We also found a significant difference between forensic and non-forensic scores in employment and working conditions (p = .046), with forensic patients rating their experiences with this factor as more positive than non-forensic participants. Clinical implications are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法医和非法医患者的羞耻感和健康的社会决定因素的影响:一项试点研究
羞耻与各种心理健康和社会困难有关。广泛的社会因素会增加个体的羞耻感。其中一个因心理健康诊断和刑事司法参与而感到羞耻的群体是法医病人。本初步研究的目的是比较诊断为精神分裂症或其他精神障碍的法医和非法医患者的羞耻感水平,并检查是否有任何健康的社会决定因素影响两组患者的羞耻感水平。43名精神分裂症或其他精神病患者(22名法医和21名非法医患者)完成了自我报告羞耻调查表和各种健康社会决定因素经历测量。统计分析显示,在法医和非法医病人之间,羞耻感水平没有显著差异。早期生活经历以及就业和工作条件对法医和非法医患者的羞耻感水平都有最显著的影响。我们还发现法医和非法医在就业和工作条件上的得分有显著差异(p = 0.046),法医患者对这一因素的评价比非法医参与者更积极。讨论了临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Good Lives Model Among Students: The Role of Primary Goods and Self-Regulation in Achieving a Good Life An Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Paraphilic Interests and Disorders Scale Use of the HCR-20 Version 3 with Women: A Narrative Synthesis Forensic Doctorate Trainee Views on an Expert by Experience (EbE)-Led Workshop: A Qualitative Exploration of Trainee Reflections Institutional Child Abuse: The Role of Disclosure, Risk, and Protective Factors in Understanding Trauma Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1