Improving Polarimetric Radar-based Drop Size Distribution Retrieval and Rain Estimation using Deep Neural Network

IF 3.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Journal of Hydrometeorology Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI:10.1175/jhm-d-22-0166.1
Ho Junho, Guifu Zhang, Petar Bukovcic, D. Parsons, Feng Xu, Jidong Gao, Jacob T. Carlin, J. Snyder
{"title":"Improving Polarimetric Radar-based Drop Size Distribution Retrieval and Rain Estimation using Deep Neural Network","authors":"Ho Junho, Guifu Zhang, Petar Bukovcic, D. Parsons, Feng Xu, Jidong Gao, Jacob T. Carlin, J. Snyder","doi":"10.1175/jhm-d-22-0166.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rain drop size distributions (DSD) and rain rate have been estimated from polarimetric radar data using different approaches with the accuracy depending on the errors both in the radar measurements and the estimation methods. Herein, a deep neural network (DNN) technique was utilized to improve the estimation of the DSD and rain rate by mitigating these errors. The performance of this approach was evaluated using measurements from a two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD) at the Kessler Atmospheric and Ecological Field Station in Oklahoma as ground truth with the results compared against conventional estimation methods for the period 2006–2017. Physical parameters (mass-/volume-weighted diameter and liquid water content), rain rate, and polarimetric radar variables (including radar reflectivity and differential reflectivity) were obtained from the DSD data. Three methods—physics-based inversion, empirical formula, and DNN—were applied to two different temporal domains (instantaneous and rain-event-average) with three diverse error assumptions (fitting, measurement, and model errors). The DSD retrievals and rain estimates from 18 cases were evaluated by calculating the bias and root mean squared error (RMSE). DNN produced the best performance for most cases, with up to a 5% reduction in RMSE when model errors existed. DSD and rain estimated from a nearby polarimetric radar using the empirical and DNN methods were well correlated with the disdrometer observations; the rain rate estimate bias of the DNN was significantly reduced (3.3% in DNN versus 50.1% in empirical). These results suggest that DNN has advantages over the physics-based and empirical methods in retrieving rain microphysics from radar observations.","PeriodicalId":15962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-22-0166.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rain drop size distributions (DSD) and rain rate have been estimated from polarimetric radar data using different approaches with the accuracy depending on the errors both in the radar measurements and the estimation methods. Herein, a deep neural network (DNN) technique was utilized to improve the estimation of the DSD and rain rate by mitigating these errors. The performance of this approach was evaluated using measurements from a two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD) at the Kessler Atmospheric and Ecological Field Station in Oklahoma as ground truth with the results compared against conventional estimation methods for the period 2006–2017. Physical parameters (mass-/volume-weighted diameter and liquid water content), rain rate, and polarimetric radar variables (including radar reflectivity and differential reflectivity) were obtained from the DSD data. Three methods—physics-based inversion, empirical formula, and DNN—were applied to two different temporal domains (instantaneous and rain-event-average) with three diverse error assumptions (fitting, measurement, and model errors). The DSD retrievals and rain estimates from 18 cases were evaluated by calculating the bias and root mean squared error (RMSE). DNN produced the best performance for most cases, with up to a 5% reduction in RMSE when model errors existed. DSD and rain estimated from a nearby polarimetric radar using the empirical and DNN methods were well correlated with the disdrometer observations; the rain rate estimate bias of the DNN was significantly reduced (3.3% in DNN versus 50.1% in empirical). These results suggest that DNN has advantages over the physics-based and empirical methods in retrieving rain microphysics from radar observations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于深度神经网络的改进极化雷达雨滴大小分布检索和降雨估计
利用不同的方法对极化雷达资料进行了雨滴大小分布和雨率的估计,其精度取决于雷达测量和估计方法的误差。本文利用深度神经网络(deep neural network, DNN)技术对DSD和雨率的估计进行了改进,减轻了这些误差。使用俄克拉荷马州凯斯勒大气与生态野外站的二维视频disdrometer (2DVD)测量结果作为地面真实值,并将结果与2006-2017年期间的常规估计方法进行比较,对该方法的性能进行了评估。物理参数(质量/体积加权直径和液态水含量)、降雨率和极化雷达变量(包括雷达反射率和差分反射率)均从DSD数据中获得。在三个不同的误差假设(拟合、测量和模型误差)下,将三种方法——基于物理的反演、经验公式和深度神经网络——应用于两个不同的时域(瞬时和降雨事件平均)。通过计算偏倚和均方根误差(RMSE),对18例病例的DSD检索结果和雨量估计值进行评估。DNN在大多数情况下产生了最好的性能,当存在模型误差时,RMSE降低了5%。利用经验和DNN方法估算的附近偏振雷达的DSD和降雨量与disprofometer观测值具有良好的相关性;DNN的雨率估计偏差显著降低(DNN为3.3%,而经验为50.1%)。这些结果表明,深度神经网络在从雷达观测数据中获取降雨微物理方面比基于物理和经验的方法更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrometeorology
Journal of Hydrometeorology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrometeorology (JHM) (ISSN: 1525-755X; eISSN: 1525-7541) publishes research on modeling, observing, and forecasting processes related to fluxes and storage of water and energy, including interactions with the boundary layer and lower atmosphere, and processes related to precipitation, radiation, and other meteorological inputs.
期刊最新文献
Patterns and trend analysis of rain-on-snow events using passive microwave satellite data over the Canadian Arctic Archipelago since 1987 Enforcing Water Balance in Multitask Deep Learning Models for Hydrological Forecasting Upper Colorado River streamflow dependencies on summertime synoptic circulations and hydroclimate variability Analysis of drought characteristics and causes in Yunnan Province in the last 60 years (1961-2020) A machine learning approach to model over ocean tropical cyclone precipitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1