Management of nasal trauma--widespread misuse of radiographs.

A. F. Oluwasanmi, A. L. Pinto
{"title":"Management of nasal trauma--widespread misuse of radiographs.","authors":"A. F. Oluwasanmi, A. L. Pinto","doi":"10.1108/14664100010343872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo assess the reasons behind the widespread use of X-ray in the management of nasal trauma despite the fact that it has no useful purpose, comparing the responses of doctors in Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments between the District General Hospitals (DGH) and the Teaching Hospitals.\n\n\nMETHOD\nA multiple-choice questionnaire was sent to all doctors in Accidents and Emergency departments in the North-West Region of England.\n\n\nRESULT\n212 questionnaires were sent out and 159 were returned. Amongst the 92 (57.9 per cent) doctors who use nasal radiographs, the overall most common reason is medico-legal in 48 (52.1 per cent). A high proportion of DGH doctors use radiographs for diagnostic purposes and 35 (28.9 per cent) will refer patients based on X-ray demonstration of nasal bone fracture. Other stated reasons included detection of unsuspected facial fracture, diagnosis of compound nasal fracture and foreign body detection.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nDoctors need to be better informed that nasal radiography has no useful value. A clear clinical guideline should be set up nationwide to protect patients from unnecessary exposure to radiation. This will also save the time of the doctors, radiographers and patients. It will prevent inappropriate referrals. Money and other resources will therefore be better utilized.","PeriodicalId":79831,"journal":{"name":"Clinical performance and quality health care","volume":"52 1","pages":"83-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical performance and quality health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/14664100010343872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the reasons behind the widespread use of X-ray in the management of nasal trauma despite the fact that it has no useful purpose, comparing the responses of doctors in Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments between the District General Hospitals (DGH) and the Teaching Hospitals. METHOD A multiple-choice questionnaire was sent to all doctors in Accidents and Emergency departments in the North-West Region of England. RESULT 212 questionnaires were sent out and 159 were returned. Amongst the 92 (57.9 per cent) doctors who use nasal radiographs, the overall most common reason is medico-legal in 48 (52.1 per cent). A high proportion of DGH doctors use radiographs for diagnostic purposes and 35 (28.9 per cent) will refer patients based on X-ray demonstration of nasal bone fracture. Other stated reasons included detection of unsuspected facial fracture, diagnosis of compound nasal fracture and foreign body detection. CONCLUSION Doctors need to be better informed that nasal radiography has no useful value. A clear clinical guideline should be set up nationwide to protect patients from unnecessary exposure to radiation. This will also save the time of the doctors, radiographers and patients. It will prevent inappropriate referrals. Money and other resources will therefore be better utilized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻外伤的处理——普遍滥用x线片。
目的比较地区综合医院(DGH)和教学医院急诊(A&E)科医生的反应,探讨x线在鼻外伤治疗中广泛使用的原因,尽管x线在临床上没有任何实际用途。方法向英格兰西北地区急诊科的所有医生发送一份多项选择问卷。结果共发放问卷212份,回收问卷159份。在92名(57.9%)使用鼻x光片的医生中,48名(52.1%)最常见的原因是医疗法律原因。很大比例的DGH医生使用x光片进行诊断,35名(28.9%)医生会根据鼻骨骨折的x光显示转诊病人。其他陈述的原因包括发现未预料到的面部骨折,诊断复合鼻骨折和异物检测。结论医生应充分认识鼻x线摄影没有实用价值。应该在全国范围内制定明确的临床指导方针,以保护患者免受不必要的辐射照射。这也将节省医生、放射技师和病人的时间。这将防止不适当的转介。因此,资金和其他资源将得到更好的利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of clinical indicators for performance measurement of health care quality: a cautionary note. An audit of psychiatric case notes in relation to antipsychotic medication and information giving. Clinical governance: its origins and its foundations. Clinical effectiveness on an acute in-patient psychiatric unit. Clinical governance and clinical documentation: still a long way to go?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1