Self-Efficacy and Job Performance of Librarians in University Libraries in Nigeria

Oluwatobi I. Omotunde
{"title":"Self-Efficacy and Job Performance of Librarians in University Libraries in Nigeria","authors":"Oluwatobi I. Omotunde","doi":"10.1080/10572317.2022.2035887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and job performance of librarian’s in university libraries in Nigeria. There seems to be a gap in literature on the actual level of self-efficacy of librarians and job performance. The survey research design of the correlational type was adopted for the study. Total enumeration method was used to cover all the 364 librarians in university librarians in south-west, Nigeria. The instrument used for data collection was the questionnaire titled: Self-efficacy and Job Performance of Librarian’s Scale (SEJPLS). The instruments were validated using construct and face validity. Cronbach’s alpha test was used to determine the reliability of the main constructs. Level of self-efficacy α = 0.668 and level of job performance α = 0.973. A total of 277 copies of the questionnaire (76.1%) were returned. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used for analyzed. The findings showed that self-efficacy of librarians was rated high (68.4%) while verbal/social persuasion was the most exhibited source of self-efficacy among librarians (mean = 11.5). finally, there was no significant relationship between self-efficacy and job performance (r = 0.04, p › .05). the study, concluded that even though there is a positive relationship between self-efficacy (r = .039) and job performance of librarians. There was no significant association of librarians’ self-efficacy and their job performance. It is, therefore, recommended that institutional support is critical for effective job performance among librarians.","PeriodicalId":39917,"journal":{"name":"International Information and Library Review","volume":"57 1","pages":"325 - 340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Information and Library Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2022.2035887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and job performance of librarian’s in university libraries in Nigeria. There seems to be a gap in literature on the actual level of self-efficacy of librarians and job performance. The survey research design of the correlational type was adopted for the study. Total enumeration method was used to cover all the 364 librarians in university librarians in south-west, Nigeria. The instrument used for data collection was the questionnaire titled: Self-efficacy and Job Performance of Librarian’s Scale (SEJPLS). The instruments were validated using construct and face validity. Cronbach’s alpha test was used to determine the reliability of the main constructs. Level of self-efficacy α = 0.668 and level of job performance α = 0.973. A total of 277 copies of the questionnaire (76.1%) were returned. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used for analyzed. The findings showed that self-efficacy of librarians was rated high (68.4%) while verbal/social persuasion was the most exhibited source of self-efficacy among librarians (mean = 11.5). finally, there was no significant relationship between self-efficacy and job performance (r = 0.04, p › .05). the study, concluded that even though there is a positive relationship between self-efficacy (r = .039) and job performance of librarians. There was no significant association of librarians’ self-efficacy and their job performance. It is, therefore, recommended that institutional support is critical for effective job performance among librarians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚大学图书馆图书馆员的自我效能感与工作绩效
摘要本研究旨在探讨奈及利亚大学图书馆馆员自我效能感与工作绩效的关系。关于图书馆员的自我效能感和工作表现的实际水平,文献似乎存在差距。本研究采用相关型调查研究设计。采用全枚举法对尼日利亚西南部地区大学图书馆员中的364名图书馆员进行了调查。数据收集工具为《图书馆员自我效能感与工作绩效量表》(SEJPLS)问卷。采用构念效度和面效度对工具进行验证。采用Cronbach’s alpha检验确定主要构念的信度。自我效能水平α = 0.668,工作绩效水平α = 0.973。共回收问卷277份,占76.1%。采用描述性统计和推理统计进行分析。研究结果显示,图书馆员自我效能感较高(68.4%),而语言/社会说服是图书馆员自我效能感的最主要来源(平均值为11.5)。最后,自我效能感与工作绩效无显著相关(r = 0.04, p > 0.05)。该研究得出结论,尽管自我效能感与图书馆员的工作绩效之间存在正相关关系(r = 0.039)。图书馆员的自我效能感与工作绩效无显著相关。因此,建议机构支持对图书馆员的有效工作绩效至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Information and Library Review
International Information and Library Review Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: For more than twenty years, the International Information and Library Review has been welcomed by information scientists, librarians and other scholars and practitioners all over the world for its timely articles on research and development in international and comparative librarianship, information sciences, information policy and information ethics, digital values and digital libraries. Contributions to the journal have come from staff or members of many different international organizations, including the United Nations, UNESCO, IFLA, and INTAMEL, and from library and information scientists in academia, government, industry, and other organizations.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Mentoring, Staff Motivation and Achievement of Organizational Set-Goals in Libraries of Public Tertiary Institutions in Lagos State, Nigeria I am Ukraine, We are Strong: Thoughts of a Librarian after a Year of the War Hidden Public Services Media and Information Literacy Self-Efficacy of LIS Students in Bangladesh Moving Libraries toward Digital Transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1