Tarsal metric trends over the Medieval-Post-Medieval transition in London.

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology Pub Date : 2022-03-17 DOI:10.1127/homo/2022/1551
Malorie E Albee
{"title":"Tarsal metric trends over the Medieval-Post-Medieval transition in London.","authors":"Malorie E Albee","doi":"10.1127/homo/2022/1551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Medieval-Post-Medieval transition in England was an important shift in the human biocultural environment. With urbanization and industrialization came resultant changes in living and working conditions and subsequent effects on the skeleton. In addition, the Post-Medieval period ushered in changes in footwear and activity patterns, with potential consequences on foot bone morphology. The objective of this study is to compare calcaneal and talar lengths between the Medieval and Post-Medieval periods to determine whether there are quantifiable differences that correspond to shifting footwear and activity patterns. T-tests and ANCOVAs (and their non-parametric equivalents) were used to compare calcaneal and talar lengths of 1086 adults from 14 London cemeteries (Medieval n = 8, Post-Medieval n = 6), available in the Oracle Wellcome Osteological Research Database (WORD) curated by the Museum of London. Males and females were also analyzed separately. In the total sample, tali and calcanei are longer in the Medieval period (p < 0.001 for both tarsals). When males and females are analyzed separately, male talar length is greater in the Post-Medieval period (p < 0.001). The difference in talar length between periods is not statistically significant for females (p = 0.093). These differences in talar and calcaneal lengths between periods likely reflect differences in footwear between the Medieval and Post-Medieval periods. The magnitude of these differences varies according to sex, indicating that the change in footwear had differential impacts on men and women. Together, these results suggest that Medieval and Post-Medieval tarsals physically incorporated their respective cultural environments and gendered differences in cultural practice, particularly related to the footwear characteristic of each period.","PeriodicalId":46714,"journal":{"name":"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Homo-Journal of Comparative Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1127/homo/2022/1551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Medieval-Post-Medieval transition in England was an important shift in the human biocultural environment. With urbanization and industrialization came resultant changes in living and working conditions and subsequent effects on the skeleton. In addition, the Post-Medieval period ushered in changes in footwear and activity patterns, with potential consequences on foot bone morphology. The objective of this study is to compare calcaneal and talar lengths between the Medieval and Post-Medieval periods to determine whether there are quantifiable differences that correspond to shifting footwear and activity patterns. T-tests and ANCOVAs (and their non-parametric equivalents) were used to compare calcaneal and talar lengths of 1086 adults from 14 London cemeteries (Medieval n = 8, Post-Medieval n = 6), available in the Oracle Wellcome Osteological Research Database (WORD) curated by the Museum of London. Males and females were also analyzed separately. In the total sample, tali and calcanei are longer in the Medieval period (p < 0.001 for both tarsals). When males and females are analyzed separately, male talar length is greater in the Post-Medieval period (p < 0.001). The difference in talar length between periods is not statistically significant for females (p = 0.093). These differences in talar and calcaneal lengths between periods likely reflect differences in footwear between the Medieval and Post-Medieval periods. The magnitude of these differences varies according to sex, indicating that the change in footwear had differential impacts on men and women. Together, these results suggest that Medieval and Post-Medieval tarsals physically incorporated their respective cultural environments and gendered differences in cultural practice, particularly related to the footwear characteristic of each period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伦敦从中世纪到后中世纪过渡时期的尺度趋势。
英国中世纪到后中世纪的过渡是人类生物文化环境的一个重要转变。随着城市化和工业化,生活和工作条件随之发生了变化,对骨骼也产生了影响。此外,后中世纪时期迎来了鞋类和活动模式的变化,对足骨形态产生了潜在的影响。本研究的目的是比较中世纪和后中世纪时期的跟骨和距骨长度,以确定是否存在与改变的鞋类和活动模式相对应的可量化差异。使用t检验和ANCOVAs(及其非参数等效)来比较来自伦敦14个墓地(中世纪n = 8,后中世纪n = 6)的1086名成年人的跟骨和距骨长度,这些墓地可在伦敦博物馆管理的Oracle Wellcome骨学研究数据库(WORD)中获得。男性和女性也分别进行了分析。在整个样本中,tali和calcanei在中世纪时期更长(p < 0.001)。当男性和女性分开分析时,男性的距骨长度在中世纪后时期更大(p < 0.001)。女性两期间距长差异无统计学意义(p = 0.093)。不同时期距骨和跟骨长度的差异可能反映了中世纪和后中世纪时期鞋类的差异。这些差异的大小因性别而异,这表明鞋子的变化对男性和女性的影响是不同的。总之,这些结果表明,中世纪和后中世纪时期的鞑靼人在文化实践中融入了各自的文化环境和性别差异,特别是与每个时期的鞋类特征有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Flat feet occurrence among young school-age children and its association with body mass index values. Revisiting the age of the Florisbad hominin material. Reproductive behaviour and longevity: Evidence from Chinese centenarians. Statistical classification methods for estimating sex based on five skull traits: A nonmetric assessment using 3D CT models. Sex- and site-specific, age-related changes in bone density - a Terry collection study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1