Inhaled Nitric Oxide as a Preoperative Test (INOP Test I): The INOP Test Study Group

D. Balzer, H. Kort, R. Day, H. Corneli, J. Kovalchin, B. Cannon, S. Kaine, D. Ivy, S. Webber, A. Rothman, R. Ross, S. Aggarwal, Masato Takahashi, J. Waldman
{"title":"Inhaled Nitric Oxide as a Preoperative Test (INOP Test I): The INOP Test Study Group","authors":"D. Balzer, H. Kort, R. Day, H. Corneli, J. Kovalchin, B. Cannon, S. Kaine, D. Ivy, S. Webber, A. Rothman, R. Ross, S. Aggarwal, Masato Takahashi, J. Waldman","doi":"10.1161/01.CIR.0000032875.55215.CB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThis study was performed to determine whether a preoperative hemodynamic evaluation with oxygen and inhaled nitric oxide identifies patients with pulmonary hypertension who are appropriate candidates for corrective cardiac surgery or transplantation more accurately than an evaluation with oxygen alone. Methods and ResultsAt 10 institutions, 124 patients with heart disease and severe pulmonary hypertension underwent cardiac catheterization to determine operability. The ratio of pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance (Rp:Rs) was determined at baseline while breathing ∼21% to 30% oxygen, and in ∼100% oxygen and ∼100% oxygen with 10 to 80 parts per million nitric oxide to evaluate pulmonary vascular reactivity. Surgery was performed in 74 patients. Twelve patients died or developed right heart failure secondary to pulmonary hypertension following surgery. Rp:Rs<0.33 and a 20% decrease in Rp:Rs from baseline were chosen as 2 criteria for operability to determine, in retrospect, the efficacy of preoperative testing in patient selection. In comparison to an evaluation with oxygen alone, sensitivity (64% versus 97%) and accuracy (68% versus 90%) were increased by an evaluation with oxygen and nitric oxide when Rp:Rs<0.33 was used as the criterion for operability. Specificity was only 8% when a 20% decrease in Rp:Rs from baseline was used as the criterion for operability. ConclusionBy using a combination of oxygen and inhaled nitric oxide, a greater number of appropriate candidates for corrective cardiac surgery or transplantation can be identified during preoperative testing when a specific value of Rp:Rs is used as a criterion for operability.","PeriodicalId":10194,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"24 1","pages":"I-76-I-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"165","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000032875.55215.CB","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 165

Abstract

BackgroundThis study was performed to determine whether a preoperative hemodynamic evaluation with oxygen and inhaled nitric oxide identifies patients with pulmonary hypertension who are appropriate candidates for corrective cardiac surgery or transplantation more accurately than an evaluation with oxygen alone. Methods and ResultsAt 10 institutions, 124 patients with heart disease and severe pulmonary hypertension underwent cardiac catheterization to determine operability. The ratio of pulmonary and systemic vascular resistance (Rp:Rs) was determined at baseline while breathing ∼21% to 30% oxygen, and in ∼100% oxygen and ∼100% oxygen with 10 to 80 parts per million nitric oxide to evaluate pulmonary vascular reactivity. Surgery was performed in 74 patients. Twelve patients died or developed right heart failure secondary to pulmonary hypertension following surgery. Rp:Rs<0.33 and a 20% decrease in Rp:Rs from baseline were chosen as 2 criteria for operability to determine, in retrospect, the efficacy of preoperative testing in patient selection. In comparison to an evaluation with oxygen alone, sensitivity (64% versus 97%) and accuracy (68% versus 90%) were increased by an evaluation with oxygen and nitric oxide when Rp:Rs<0.33 was used as the criterion for operability. Specificity was only 8% when a 20% decrease in Rp:Rs from baseline was used as the criterion for operability. ConclusionBy using a combination of oxygen and inhaled nitric oxide, a greater number of appropriate candidates for corrective cardiac surgery or transplantation can be identified during preoperative testing when a specific value of Rp:Rs is used as a criterion for operability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸入一氧化氮作为术前检查(INOP试验I): INOP试验研究组
背景:本研究旨在确定术前用氧气和吸入一氧化氮进行血流动力学评估是否比单独用氧气评估更准确地确定肺动脉高压患者是否适合进行心脏矫正手术或移植。方法与结果对10家医院124例心脏病合并重度肺动脉高压患者行心导管置入术,观察其可操作性。在呼吸~ 21% ~ 30%氧气、在~ 100%氧气和~ 100%氧气中加入10 ~ 80百万分之一的一氧化氮时,测定肺血管和全身血管阻力比(Rp:Rs),以评估肺血管反应性。74例患者接受手术治疗。12例患者术后死亡或并发右心衰继发肺动脉高压。Rp:Rs<0.33和Rp:Rs较基线降低20%作为可操作性的2个标准,以确定术前检测在患者选择中的有效性。当Rp:Rs<0.33作为可操作性标准时,与单独氧气评价相比,氧气和一氧化氮评价的敏感性(64%对97%)和准确性(68%对90%)都有所提高。当Rp:Rs较基线下降20%作为可操作性标准时,特异性仅为8%。结论在术前检测中,以Rp:Rs的特定值作为可操作性的标准,通过联合使用氧气和吸入一氧化氮,可以确定更多适合心脏矫正手术或移植的候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts 4th Scientific Forum on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Heat Shock Protein 72 Enhances Manganese Superoxide Dismutase Activity During Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury, Associated With Mitochondrial Protection and Apoptosis Reduction Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Surgical Therapy for Aortic Stenosis: Correlation to Renin-Angiotensin System Gene Expression Circulatory Assistance With a Permanent Implantable IABP: Initial Human Experience Keratinocyte Growth Factor Enhances Post-Pneumonectomy Lung Growth by Alveolar Proliferation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1