{"title":"Software tools for indexing: revisited","authors":"N. Mulvany","doi":"10.3828/indexer.1999.21.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Basic features of four embedded indexing programs are discussed and compared with a dedicated indexing program. The programs are Word, FrameMaker, PageMaker, RoboHELP and Macrex. The tests performed duplicate tests done ten years earlier. The author outlines features that have improved during the past decade and deficiencies that still exist in embedded indexing software.","PeriodicalId":83061,"journal":{"name":"The indexer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The indexer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.1999.21.4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Basic features of four embedded indexing programs are discussed and compared with a dedicated indexing program. The programs are Word, FrameMaker, PageMaker, RoboHELP and Macrex. The tests performed duplicate tests done ten years earlier. The author outlines features that have improved during the past decade and deficiencies that still exist in embedded indexing software.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
