Effect of Napier silage on milk production of Holstein Friesian Crossbred Cow

M. Habib, M. Akbar, ZH Khandaker
{"title":"Effect of Napier silage on milk production of Holstein Friesian Crossbred Cow","authors":"M. Habib, M. Akbar, ZH Khandaker","doi":"10.3329/bjas.v51i2.60497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work aspired to evaluate the quality of different types of silage on milk production made from whole napier grass, napier stem, and napier leaf. Napier grass (Pennisetum Purpureum) was harvested at 70 days of age and made into three types of silage in three different silo pits under proper anaerobic conditions for 45 days. A feeding program of 60 days duration was designed on nine (9) lactating (110-140 days after calving) Holstein Friesian crossbred dairy cows of 2nd parity (age 6-7 years, live weight 500±5 kg). The cows were divided into 3 groups and assigned to 3 dietary treatments, basal ingredients with whole napier grass silage (T1), basal ingredients with chopped napier leaf silage (T2), and basal ingredients with napier stem silage (T3). After ensiling, it was found that napier stem silage possesses the highest pH value indicating low-quality silage whereas napier leaf silage possesses the lowest pH value. The pH value of whole napier grass silage was slightly higher than that of napier leaf silage. Concentrations of CP and NH3-N were highest in napier leaf silage and lowest in napier stem silage. The CP value was almost similar in whole napier grass silage and napier leaf silage but the NH3-N value of whole napier grass silage was lower than that of napier leaf silage. Among the three groups, the cows of napier leaf silage group gave significantly (P<0.05) higher milk yield than the cows of whole napier grass and napier stem silage group. On the other hand, the cows of napier stem silage group gave significantly (P<0.05) lower milk yield than the cows of whole napier grass and napier leaf silage group. It can be concluded that napier leaf and whole napier grass silage are comparatively better than napier stem silage in respect to milk production of dairy cows. \nBangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 51 (2): 62-67.","PeriodicalId":8873,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjas.v51i2.60497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This work aspired to evaluate the quality of different types of silage on milk production made from whole napier grass, napier stem, and napier leaf. Napier grass (Pennisetum Purpureum) was harvested at 70 days of age and made into three types of silage in three different silo pits under proper anaerobic conditions for 45 days. A feeding program of 60 days duration was designed on nine (9) lactating (110-140 days after calving) Holstein Friesian crossbred dairy cows of 2nd parity (age 6-7 years, live weight 500±5 kg). The cows were divided into 3 groups and assigned to 3 dietary treatments, basal ingredients with whole napier grass silage (T1), basal ingredients with chopped napier leaf silage (T2), and basal ingredients with napier stem silage (T3). After ensiling, it was found that napier stem silage possesses the highest pH value indicating low-quality silage whereas napier leaf silage possesses the lowest pH value. The pH value of whole napier grass silage was slightly higher than that of napier leaf silage. Concentrations of CP and NH3-N were highest in napier leaf silage and lowest in napier stem silage. The CP value was almost similar in whole napier grass silage and napier leaf silage but the NH3-N value of whole napier grass silage was lower than that of napier leaf silage. Among the three groups, the cows of napier leaf silage group gave significantly (P<0.05) higher milk yield than the cows of whole napier grass and napier stem silage group. On the other hand, the cows of napier stem silage group gave significantly (P<0.05) lower milk yield than the cows of whole napier grass and napier leaf silage group. It can be concluded that napier leaf and whole napier grass silage are comparatively better than napier stem silage in respect to milk production of dairy cows. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 51 (2): 62-67.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纳皮尔青贮对荷斯坦黑种杂交奶牛产奶量的影响
本研究旨在评价不同类型青贮饲料对全草、茎、叶产奶的影响。取70日龄的纳皮草(Pennisetum Purpureum),在适宜的厌氧条件下,在3个不同的筒仓坑中进行3种青贮,发酵45 d。试验选用9头泌乳期(产犊后110 ~ 140 d) 2胎荷斯坦弗里西亚杂交奶牛(6 ~ 7岁,活重500±5 kg),饲喂60 d。将奶牛分为3组,分别饲喂全草料基础青贮(T1)、碎叶青贮基础青贮(T2)、茎青贮基础青贮(T3) 3个饲粮处理。青贮后发现,青贮后青贮的pH值最高,表明青贮质量较低,青贮的pH值最低。全草青贮的pH值略高于叶青贮。CP和NH3-N含量以叶青贮最高,茎青贮最低。全草青贮和叶青贮的CP值基本相同,但全草青贮的NH3-N值低于叶青贮。3组中,叶青贮组奶牛产奶量显著(P<0.05)高于全草和茎青贮组奶牛。另一方面,茎青贮组奶牛的产奶量显著(P<0.05)低于全草和叶青贮组奶牛。综上所述,在奶牛产奶量方面,粗叶青贮和全粗草青贮相对优于粗茎青贮。动物学报,51(2):62-67。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of age on follicular dynamics of goat ovaries Neuroanatomy of lumbosacral and pudendal plexus in pigeon of Bangladesh Effect of diluters on frozen semen production of Black Bengal Goat Production performance, breeding practices and challenges of Holstein-Local crossbred cattle in some selected areas of Bangladesh Evaluation of degradability of Moringa, Pineapple waste and Plantain herbs by in situ and in vitro gas production technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1