Influence of the Impact Angle on Machining in Powder Jet Processing

Chieko Kuji, Kuniyuki Izumita, K. Shimada, M. Mizutani, K. Sasaki, T. Kuriyagawa
{"title":"Influence of the Impact Angle on Machining in Powder Jet Processing","authors":"Chieko Kuji, Kuniyuki Izumita, K. Shimada, M. Mizutani, K. Sasaki, T. Kuriyagawa","doi":"10.20965/ijat.2023.p0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Powder jet machining is a blast machining process in which micrometer-order particles are projected onto a workpiece at near-supersonic speeds, to remove the workpiece (abrasive jet machining (AJM)) or to deposit the particles (powder jet deposition (PJD)). We report a novel dental treatment method for powder jet machining using hydroxyapatite, which is the main component of teeth, as deposited particles. The surfaces and interdental spaces of human teeth are not only flat, but also have complex groove structures. However, PJD and AJM exhibit impact-angle-dependent machining phases. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effect of the particle impact angle on machining, before dental treatment. Furthermore, because machining interacts not only with the particle impact angle but also with the particle impact velocity, a comprehensive investigation of the effects of the machining parameters is required, for delineating the phase-transition conditions. Accordingly, in this study, we conducted machining experiments using hydroxyapatite particles (particle diameter, 2.16 μm) and four different blasting angles of 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°, to infer the machining amount. Machining efficiency was evaluated based on the amount of machining. The impact angles and velocities of the particles were calculated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Three-dimensional process mapping was performed using the machining amount, particle impact angle, and particle impact velocity, obtained from the experiments and CFD calculations. The results showed that PJD crossed to AJM at the impact angle of approximately 60°. Moreover, PJD exhibited high processing efficiency for impact angles above 60° and impact velocities in the 280–310 m/s range. In contrast, AJM exhibited high processing efficiency for impact angles below approximately 35° and impact velocities above 310 m/s.","PeriodicalId":13583,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Autom. Technol.","volume":"204 1","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Autom. Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2023.p0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Powder jet machining is a blast machining process in which micrometer-order particles are projected onto a workpiece at near-supersonic speeds, to remove the workpiece (abrasive jet machining (AJM)) or to deposit the particles (powder jet deposition (PJD)). We report a novel dental treatment method for powder jet machining using hydroxyapatite, which is the main component of teeth, as deposited particles. The surfaces and interdental spaces of human teeth are not only flat, but also have complex groove structures. However, PJD and AJM exhibit impact-angle-dependent machining phases. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effect of the particle impact angle on machining, before dental treatment. Furthermore, because machining interacts not only with the particle impact angle but also with the particle impact velocity, a comprehensive investigation of the effects of the machining parameters is required, for delineating the phase-transition conditions. Accordingly, in this study, we conducted machining experiments using hydroxyapatite particles (particle diameter, 2.16 μm) and four different blasting angles of 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°, to infer the machining amount. Machining efficiency was evaluated based on the amount of machining. The impact angles and velocities of the particles were calculated using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Three-dimensional process mapping was performed using the machining amount, particle impact angle, and particle impact velocity, obtained from the experiments and CFD calculations. The results showed that PJD crossed to AJM at the impact angle of approximately 60°. Moreover, PJD exhibited high processing efficiency for impact angles above 60° and impact velocities in the 280–310 m/s range. In contrast, AJM exhibited high processing efficiency for impact angles below approximately 35° and impact velocities above 310 m/s.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粉末射流加工中冲击角对加工的影响
粉末射流加工是一种喷射加工过程,其中微米级的颗粒以接近超音速的速度投射到工件上,以去除工件(磨料射流加工(AJM))或沉积颗粒(粉末射流沉积(PJD))。本文报道了一种利用羟基磷灰石(牙齿的主要成分)作为沉积颗粒进行粉末射流加工的新型牙齿治疗方法。人类牙齿的表面和齿间空间不仅是平坦的,而且有复杂的凹槽结构。然而,PJD和AJM表现出与冲击角相关的加工阶段。因此,有必要在牙科治疗前研究颗粒撞击角对加工的影响。此外,由于加工不仅与颗粒的冲击角相互作用,而且与颗粒的冲击速度相互作用,因此需要对加工参数的影响进行全面的研究,以描述相变条件。因此,在本研究中,我们利用羟基磷灰石颗粒(粒径为2.16 μm)和30°、45°、60°和90°4种不同的爆破角度进行加工实验,推断加工量。根据加工量来评价加工效率。利用计算流体力学(CFD)计算了颗粒的碰撞角和速度。利用实验和CFD计算得到的加工量、颗粒撞击角度和颗粒撞击速度进行三维工艺制图。结果表明,PJD与AJM的碰撞角约为60°。此外,PJD在60°以上的冲击角度和280 ~ 310 m/s的冲击速度范围内具有较高的处理效率。相比之下,AJM在冲击角度小于约35°,冲击速度大于310 m/s时具有较高的处理效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advantages of Injection Mold with Hybrid Process of Metal Powder Bed Fusion and Subtractive Process Experimental Investigation of Spatter Particle Behavior and Improvement in Build Quality in PBF-LB Process Planning with Removal of Melting Penetration and Temper Colors in 5-Axis Hybrid Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing Technique for Introducing Internal Defects with Arbitrary Sizes and Locations in Metals via Additive Manufacturing and Evaluation of Fatigue Properties Editorial: Recent Trends in Additive Manufacturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1