{"title":"Alert fatigue and errors caused by technology: A scoping review and introduction to the flow of cognitive processing model","authors":"","doi":"10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technologies such as electronic health records (EHRs), embedded clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems are at the forefront of healthcare’s technological revolution. These health information technologies (HIT) pose great promise to improve patient safety, reduce medication errors and increase operational efficiencies in healthcare organizations. However, despite the perceived benefits that these complex technologies offer, their associated risks must not be overlooked or disregarded (Borycki et al., 2012). The objective of this article is to answer the following questions: 1) What is the nature of errors caused by technology (i.e., technology-induced errors) and alert fatigue in healthcare? 2) Is there a relationship between alert fatigue and technology-induced errors? 3) Do organizational strategies exist to address these problems and enhance patient safety? 4) Do technological recommendations exist to improve the current issues surrounding safety? To answer these questions a scoping review following the Arksey and O’Malley (2005) framework was conducted using the CINAHL®, Web of Science®, IEEE Xplore® and PubMed® databases. The search focused on English publications only, using the search terms “Alert Fatigue” and “Technology Errors.” Articles were iteratively assessed based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in an inclusion of 36 articles in the final scoping review. Following this, a thematic analysis was conducted and the findings placed in a data extraction table. The results indicated that while HIT present a significant opportunity to streamline processes and reduce medication errors, there is a critical need to assess them from a patient safety and quality lens. Lastly, a novel conceptual tool was created, the Flow of Cognitive Processing Model. The model provides an iterative perspective and an insightful view into the cognitive realms of healthcare professionals in their interactions with HIT. By illustrating the complexities of healthcare providers from a humanistic lens, the model could guide HIT design, acquisitions and implementations to reduce alert fatigue and mitigate the introduction of technology-induced errors.","PeriodicalId":45327,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal","volume":"452 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Management & E-Learning-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2021.13.027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Technologies such as electronic health records (EHRs), embedded clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems are at the forefront of healthcare’s technological revolution. These health information technologies (HIT) pose great promise to improve patient safety, reduce medication errors and increase operational efficiencies in healthcare organizations. However, despite the perceived benefits that these complex technologies offer, their associated risks must not be overlooked or disregarded (Borycki et al., 2012). The objective of this article is to answer the following questions: 1) What is the nature of errors caused by technology (i.e., technology-induced errors) and alert fatigue in healthcare? 2) Is there a relationship between alert fatigue and technology-induced errors? 3) Do organizational strategies exist to address these problems and enhance patient safety? 4) Do technological recommendations exist to improve the current issues surrounding safety? To answer these questions a scoping review following the Arksey and O’Malley (2005) framework was conducted using the CINAHL®, Web of Science®, IEEE Xplore® and PubMed® databases. The search focused on English publications only, using the search terms “Alert Fatigue” and “Technology Errors.” Articles were iteratively assessed based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in an inclusion of 36 articles in the final scoping review. Following this, a thematic analysis was conducted and the findings placed in a data extraction table. The results indicated that while HIT present a significant opportunity to streamline processes and reduce medication errors, there is a critical need to assess them from a patient safety and quality lens. Lastly, a novel conceptual tool was created, the Flow of Cognitive Processing Model. The model provides an iterative perspective and an insightful view into the cognitive realms of healthcare professionals in their interactions with HIT. By illustrating the complexities of healthcare providers from a humanistic lens, the model could guide HIT design, acquisitions and implementations to reduce alert fatigue and mitigate the introduction of technology-induced errors.
电子健康记录(EHRs)、嵌入式临床决策支持系统(CDSS)和计算机化医嘱输入(CPOE)系统等技术处于医疗保健技术革命的前沿。这些健康信息技术(HIT)为改善患者安全、减少用药错误和提高医疗保健组织的运营效率带来了巨大的希望。然而,尽管这些复杂的技术提供了明显的好处,但它们的相关风险也不能被忽视或忽视(Borycki et al., 2012)。本文的目的是回答以下问题:1)医疗保健中由技术引起的错误(即技术引起的错误)和警报疲劳的性质是什么?2)警觉性疲劳与技术引起的错误之间是否存在关系?是否存在解决这些问题和提高患者安全的组织策略?4)是否存在技术建议来改善当前的安全问题?为了回答这些问题,我们使用CINAHL®、Web of Science®、IEEE Xplore®和PubMed®数据库,按照Arksey和O 'Malley(2005)框架进行了范围审查。搜索只集中在英文出版物上,使用搜索词“警报疲劳”和“技术错误”。根据纳入和排除标准对文章进行了迭代评估,最终在范围审查中纳入了36篇文章。在此之后,进行了专题分析,并将调查结果列在数据提取表中。结果表明,虽然HIT为简化流程和减少用药错误提供了重要机会,但迫切需要从患者安全和质量的角度对其进行评估。最后,提出了一种新的概念工具——认知加工流程模型。该模型为医疗保健专业人员在与HIT互动时的认知领域提供了一个迭代的视角和深刻的观点。通过从人文角度说明医疗保健提供者的复杂性,该模型可以指导HIT的设计、获取和实施,以减少警报疲劳并减轻技术引起的错误的引入。