Decentralizing Platform Governance: Lawlessness, Fraud and Innovation

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW Law Probability & Risk Pub Date : 2021-02-02 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.3777697
A. Zhang
{"title":"Decentralizing Platform Governance: Lawlessness, Fraud and Innovation","authors":"A. Zhang","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3777697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rule-making and dispute resolution are essential functions of online platforms. Many of these platforms have traditionally adopted a centralized model of governance to create and enforce rules for platform participants. However, a large number of online platforms, particularly those in China, have recently experimented with various schemes in order to decentralize their governance. This paper represents the first systematic effort to explore the phenomenon of platform decentralization, with a particular focus on innovations from China. Contrary to the existing literature, which suggests that current Chinese innovations have been spurred by the authoritarian government’s undersupply of private law, I will show that these new decentralization initiatives are driven more by the increased demand to address market failures, particularly the rampant fraud plaguing China’s e-commerce industry. Platform decentralization has proved advantageous, helping Chinese online marketplaces tackle information failures in their own reputation systems more efficiently. Decentralization has also enabled platform operators to better respond to enforcement failures through increased engagement with users and by facilitating the exploration of community norms. The promising results of China’s experience in platform decentralization has shown how technology can be employed to enable user-generated justice to govern the digital economy. They further reveal the prospects for Chinese tech giants to take the leap to create more innovations in order to remedy weak market conditions.","PeriodicalId":48724,"journal":{"name":"Law Probability & Risk","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Probability & Risk","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3777697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Rule-making and dispute resolution are essential functions of online platforms. Many of these platforms have traditionally adopted a centralized model of governance to create and enforce rules for platform participants. However, a large number of online platforms, particularly those in China, have recently experimented with various schemes in order to decentralize their governance. This paper represents the first systematic effort to explore the phenomenon of platform decentralization, with a particular focus on innovations from China. Contrary to the existing literature, which suggests that current Chinese innovations have been spurred by the authoritarian government’s undersupply of private law, I will show that these new decentralization initiatives are driven more by the increased demand to address market failures, particularly the rampant fraud plaguing China’s e-commerce industry. Platform decentralization has proved advantageous, helping Chinese online marketplaces tackle information failures in their own reputation systems more efficiently. Decentralization has also enabled platform operators to better respond to enforcement failures through increased engagement with users and by facilitating the exploration of community norms. The promising results of China’s experience in platform decentralization has shown how technology can be employed to enable user-generated justice to govern the digital economy. They further reveal the prospects for Chinese tech giants to take the leap to create more innovations in order to remedy weak market conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
去中心化平台治理:无法无天、欺诈和创新
规则制定和争议解决是网络平台的基本功能。许多平台传统上采用集中式治理模型来为平台参与者创建和执行规则。然而,大量的在线平台,特别是中国的在线平台,最近尝试了各种方案,以分散其治理。本文首次系统地探讨了平台去中心化现象,并特别关注了来自中国的创新。与现有文献相反,这些文献表明,当前中国的创新是由专制政府对私法的供应不足所刺激的,我将表明,这些新的权力下放举措更多地是由解决市场失灵的需求所驱动的,尤其是困扰中国电子商务行业的猖獗欺诈。事实证明,平台去中心化是有利的,它帮助中国的在线市场更有效地解决自身信誉系统中的信息故障。去中心化还使平台运营商能够通过增加与用户的接触和促进对社区规范的探索,更好地应对执法失败。中国在平台去中心化方面的经验取得了可喜的成果,表明了如何利用技术来实现用户生成的正义来治理数字经济。它们进一步揭示了中国科技巨头为弥补疲软的市场状况而进行更多创新的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Law Probability & Risk
Law Probability & Risk MATHEMATICSSTATISTICS & PROBABILITY&-STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Law, Probability & Risk is a fully refereed journal which publishes papers dealing with topics on the interface of law and probabilistic reasoning. These are interpreted broadly to include aspects relevant to the interpretation of scientific evidence, the assessment of uncertainty and the assessment of risk. The readership includes academic lawyers, mathematicians, statisticians and social scientists with interests in quantitative reasoning. The primary objective of the journal is to cover issues in law, which have a scientific element, with an emphasis on statistical and probabilistic issues and the assessment of risk. Examples of topics which may be covered include communications law, computers and the law, environmental law, law and medicine, regulatory law for science and technology, identification problems (such as DNA but including other materials), sampling issues (drugs, computer pornography, fraud), offender profiling, credit scoring, risk assessment, the role of statistics and probability in drafting legislation, the assessment of competing theories of evidence (possibly with a view to forming an optimal combination of them). In addition, a whole new area is emerging in the application of computers to medicine and other safety-critical areas. New legislation is required to define the responsibility of computer experts who develop software for tackling these safety-critical problems.
期刊最新文献
From specific-source feature-based to common-source score-based likelihood-ratio systems: ranking the stars Information economics in the criminal standard of proof Odds ratios as a measure of disproportionate treatment: application to jury venires Inconclusive conclusions in forensic science: rejoinders to Scurich, Morrison, Sinha and Gutierrez Signal detection theory fails to account for real-world consequences of inconclusive decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1