Photoemission satellites “on” and “off” resonance in transition metals and their oxides

M.G. Ramsey, G.J. Russell
{"title":"Photoemission satellites “on” and “off” resonance in transition metals and their oxides","authors":"M.G. Ramsey,&nbsp;G.J. Russell","doi":"10.1016/0378-5963(85)90053-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Resonant photoemission has attracted considerable interest since 1977, when an enhancement of the valence band satellite in Ni at photon energies close to the 3p core level binding energy was first observed. Interpretations for the presence of this satellite, and similar satellites found in other transition metals, have included autoionization, M<sub>2,3</sub>VV Auger processes, interband transitions, shake-up excitations and various combinations of these. We explain the energies of these photoemission satellites using a simple model, corrected for the final state effect of hole-hole Coulomb interaction and relaxation by using U<sub>eff</sub> determined empirically from our Auger results. “Off” resonance the satellites observed are interpreted in terms of a shake-up process and at resonance as merely the M<sub>2,3</sub>VV Auger feature occurring at the energy of the shake-up satellite. We show that the recent conclusions of Chandesris et al. [Phys. Rev. B27 (1983) 2630], which state that the correlation energy between two 3d holes is constant for Cr through to Ni, are incorrect and that the second satellite, observed at resonance in Ni is merely the manifestation of a peak observed in the M<sub>2,3</sub>VV Auger spectra. Further we conclude that the 3 eV increase in the satellite to main photoemission peak separation in going from Ni to NiO, is unlikely to be due to an increase in <em>U</em><sub>eff</sub> as tentatively assigned by Thuler et al. [Phys. Rev. B27 (1983) 2082]. We suggest that for “off” resonance it is a shake-up process involving empty 4sp states at the bottom of the conduction band, whilst at resonance it is due simply to changes in the energy of the M<sub>2,3</sub>VV Auger transition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100105,"journal":{"name":"Applications of Surface Science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Pages 206-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0378-5963(85)90053-4","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications of Surface Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378596385900534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Resonant photoemission has attracted considerable interest since 1977, when an enhancement of the valence band satellite in Ni at photon energies close to the 3p core level binding energy was first observed. Interpretations for the presence of this satellite, and similar satellites found in other transition metals, have included autoionization, M2,3VV Auger processes, interband transitions, shake-up excitations and various combinations of these. We explain the energies of these photoemission satellites using a simple model, corrected for the final state effect of hole-hole Coulomb interaction and relaxation by using Ueff determined empirically from our Auger results. “Off” resonance the satellites observed are interpreted in terms of a shake-up process and at resonance as merely the M2,3VV Auger feature occurring at the energy of the shake-up satellite. We show that the recent conclusions of Chandesris et al. [Phys. Rev. B27 (1983) 2630], which state that the correlation energy between two 3d holes is constant for Cr through to Ni, are incorrect and that the second satellite, observed at resonance in Ni is merely the manifestation of a peak observed in the M2,3VV Auger spectra. Further we conclude that the 3 eV increase in the satellite to main photoemission peak separation in going from Ni to NiO, is unlikely to be due to an increase in Ueff as tentatively assigned by Thuler et al. [Phys. Rev. B27 (1983) 2082]. We suggest that for “off” resonance it is a shake-up process involving empty 4sp states at the bottom of the conduction band, whilst at resonance it is due simply to changes in the energy of the M2,3VV Auger transition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光电卫星在过渡金属及其氧化物中“开”和“关”共振
自1977年以来,共振光发射引起了相当大的兴趣,当时首次观察到Ni中的价带卫星在光子能量接近3p核能级结合能时的增强。对这颗卫星的存在,以及在其他过渡金属中发现的类似卫星的解释,包括自电离、M2、3VV俄歇过程、带间跃迁、震荡激发和这些的各种组合。我们用一个简单的模型来解释这些光电卫星的能量,修正了孔-孔库仑相互作用和弛豫的最终状态效应,使用了从我们的俄歇结果中经验确定的乌夫。卫星观测到的“关闭”共振被解释为振荡过程,而在共振时,仅仅是振荡卫星能量处出现的M2,3VV俄歇特征。我们展示了Chandesris等人最近的结论。Rev. B27(1983) 2630],其中指出两个三维空穴之间的相关能量从Cr到Ni是恒定的,这是不正确的,并且在Ni中共振观察到的第二颗卫星仅仅是在M2,3VV俄格光谱中观察到的峰值的表现。此外,我们得出结论,卫星从Ni到NiO的3 eV增加到主要光电峰值分离,不太可能是由于Thuler等人暂时认为的Ueff的增加。Rev. B27(1983)[2082]。我们认为,对于“关闭”共振,这是一个振荡过程,涉及导带底部的空4sp态,而在共振时,这仅仅是由于M2,3VV俄歇跃迁的能量变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Subject index Author index Preface Effect of different methods of oxidation on SiSiO2 interface state properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1