Predictors of Severe Right Ventricular Failure After Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Device Insertion: Analysis of 245 Patients

Y. Ochiai, P. McCarthy, N. Smedira, M. Banbury, J. Navia, Jingyuan Feng, A. Hsu, M. Yeager, T. Buda, K. Hoercher, M. Howard, M. Takagaki, K. Doi, K. Fukamachi
{"title":"Predictors of Severe Right Ventricular Failure After Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Device Insertion: Analysis of 245 Patients","authors":"Y. Ochiai, P. McCarthy, N. Smedira, M. Banbury, J. Navia, Jingyuan Feng, A. Hsu, M. Yeager, T. Buda, K. Hoercher, M. Howard, M. Takagaki, K. Doi, K. Fukamachi","doi":"10.1161/01.CIR.0000032906.33237.1C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundInsertion of an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) complicated by early right ventricular (RV) failure has a poor prognosis and is largely unpredictable. Prediction of RV failure after LVAD placement would lead to more precise patient selection and optimal device selection. Methods and ResultsWe reviewed data from 245 patients (mean age, 54±11 years; 85% male) with 189 HeartMate (77%) and 56 Novacor (23%) LVADs. Ischemic cardiomyopathy predominated (65%), and 29% had dilated cardiomyopathy. Overall, RV assist device (RVAD) support was required after LVAD insertion for 23 patients (9%). We compared clinical and hemodynamic parameters before LVAD insertion between RVAD (n=23) and No-RVAD patients (n=222) to determine preoperative risk factors for severe RV failure. By univariate analysis, female gender, small body surface area, nonischemic etiology, preoperative mechanical ventilation, circulatory support before LVAD insertion, low mean and diastolic pulmonary artery pressures (PAPs), low RV stroke work (RVSW), and low RVSW index (RVSWI) were significantly associated with RVAD use. Elevated PAP and pulmonary vascular resistance were not risk factors. Risk factors by multivariable logistic regression were preoperative circulatory support (odds ratio [OR], 5.3), female gender (OR, 4.5), and nonischemic etiology (OR, 3.3). ConclusionsThe need for circulatory support, female gender, and nonischemic etiology were the most significant predictors for RVAD use after LVAD insertion. Regarding hemodynamics, low PAP and low RVSWI, reflecting low RV contractility, were important parameters. This information may lead to better patient selection for isolated LVAD implantation.","PeriodicalId":10194,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"11 1","pages":"I-198-I-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"461","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000032906.33237.1C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 461

Abstract

BackgroundInsertion of an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) complicated by early right ventricular (RV) failure has a poor prognosis and is largely unpredictable. Prediction of RV failure after LVAD placement would lead to more precise patient selection and optimal device selection. Methods and ResultsWe reviewed data from 245 patients (mean age, 54±11 years; 85% male) with 189 HeartMate (77%) and 56 Novacor (23%) LVADs. Ischemic cardiomyopathy predominated (65%), and 29% had dilated cardiomyopathy. Overall, RV assist device (RVAD) support was required after LVAD insertion for 23 patients (9%). We compared clinical and hemodynamic parameters before LVAD insertion between RVAD (n=23) and No-RVAD patients (n=222) to determine preoperative risk factors for severe RV failure. By univariate analysis, female gender, small body surface area, nonischemic etiology, preoperative mechanical ventilation, circulatory support before LVAD insertion, low mean and diastolic pulmonary artery pressures (PAPs), low RV stroke work (RVSW), and low RVSW index (RVSWI) were significantly associated with RVAD use. Elevated PAP and pulmonary vascular resistance were not risk factors. Risk factors by multivariable logistic regression were preoperative circulatory support (odds ratio [OR], 5.3), female gender (OR, 4.5), and nonischemic etiology (OR, 3.3). ConclusionsThe need for circulatory support, female gender, and nonischemic etiology were the most significant predictors for RVAD use after LVAD insertion. Regarding hemodynamics, low PAP and low RVSWI, reflecting low RV contractility, were important parameters. This information may lead to better patient selection for isolated LVAD implantation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植入式左心室辅助装置植入后严重右心室衰竭的预测因素:245例患者分析
植入植入式左心室辅助装置(LVAD)并发早期右心室(RV)衰竭,预后差,很大程度上是不可预测的。对LVAD置放后左室衰竭的预测将导致更精确的患者选择和最佳装置选择。方法与结果我们回顾了245例患者的资料(平均年龄54±11岁;85%男性),189个HeartMate(77%)和56个Novacor (23%) lvad。缺血性心肌病占主导地位(65%),扩张型心肌病占29%。总体而言,23例(9%)患者在LVAD插入后需要RV辅助装置(RVAD)支持。我们比较了RVAD患者(n=23)和无RVAD患者(n=222)在LVAD插入前的临床和血流动力学参数,以确定严重RV衰竭的术前危险因素。单因素分析显示,女性、体表面积小、非缺血性病因、术前机械通气、LVAD插入前循环支持、低平均和舒张肺动脉压(pap)、低左室卒中功(RVSW)和低RVSW指数(RVSWI)与RVAD使用显著相关。PAP升高和肺血管阻力不是危险因素。多变量logistic回归分析的危险因素为术前循环支持(比值比[OR], 5.3)、女性性别(比值比[OR], 4.5)和非缺血性病因(比值比,3.3)。结论循环支持需求、女性性别和非缺血性病因是LVAD插入后RVAD使用的最重要预测因素。在血流动力学方面,低PAP和低RVSWI是反映低RV收缩性的重要参数。这一信息可以帮助患者更好地选择孤立性左室辅助器植入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts 4th Scientific Forum on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Heat Shock Protein 72 Enhances Manganese Superoxide Dismutase Activity During Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury, Associated With Mitochondrial Protection and Apoptosis Reduction Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Surgical Therapy for Aortic Stenosis: Correlation to Renin-Angiotensin System Gene Expression Circulatory Assistance With a Permanent Implantable IABP: Initial Human Experience Keratinocyte Growth Factor Enhances Post-Pneumonectomy Lung Growth by Alveolar Proliferation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1