N. Sivrikova, E. Moiseeva, N. Sokolova, T. Ptashko, E. Chernikova, Natalya Artemeva
{"title":"Analysis of Nominal Pedagogical Experimental Data Using the Example of the Development of Conflict Competence","authors":"N. Sivrikova, E. Moiseeva, N. Sokolova, T. Ptashko, E. Chernikova, Natalya Artemeva","doi":"10.26907/esd.17.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper examines the problem of using mathematical statistics methods in pedagogical research. It identifies and describes the possibilities of using different methods of analysis of nominal data in processing the results of pedagogical experiments. The authors analyzed the frequency of use of statistical criteria in 100 publications in journals included in Web of Science and the Russian Index of Scientific Citation. The criteria for selecting publications were (1) year of issue; (2) reviews of manuscripts; (3) free access to the publication from the publisher; (4) availability of quantitative data on test results before and after pedagogical impact; (5) conclusions about the effectiveness of pedagogical impact. It was found that 45% of publications did not use mathematical statistics methods to test scientific hypotheses. Of the mathematical statistics methods used by the authors, the T-Test and Chi-square Test are more often used. For the study example of developing conflict readiness in future teachers, it presents the possibilities of using: Chi-square Test, Fisher’s Exact Test (Phi test), Cramer 's V Test and Somers’ d Test.","PeriodicalId":37225,"journal":{"name":"Education and Self Development","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Self Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.17.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The paper examines the problem of using mathematical statistics methods in pedagogical research. It identifies and describes the possibilities of using different methods of analysis of nominal data in processing the results of pedagogical experiments. The authors analyzed the frequency of use of statistical criteria in 100 publications in journals included in Web of Science and the Russian Index of Scientific Citation. The criteria for selecting publications were (1) year of issue; (2) reviews of manuscripts; (3) free access to the publication from the publisher; (4) availability of quantitative data on test results before and after pedagogical impact; (5) conclusions about the effectiveness of pedagogical impact. It was found that 45% of publications did not use mathematical statistics methods to test scientific hypotheses. Of the mathematical statistics methods used by the authors, the T-Test and Chi-square Test are more often used. For the study example of developing conflict readiness in future teachers, it presents the possibilities of using: Chi-square Test, Fisher’s Exact Test (Phi test), Cramer 's V Test and Somers’ d Test.
本文探讨了数理统计方法在教学研究中的应用问题。它确定并描述了在处理教学实验结果时使用不同方法分析标称数据的可能性。作者分析了Web of Science和俄罗斯科学引文索引收录的100种期刊中统计标准的使用频率。选择出版物的标准是(1)发行年份;(二)审稿;(三)从出版者处免费获取出版物;(4)教学影响前后测试结果的定量数据的可用性;(5)关于教学影响有效性的结论。研究发现,45%的出版物没有使用数理统计方法来检验科学假设。在作者使用的数理统计方法中,使用较多的是t检验和卡方检验。对于未来教师冲突准备的研究实例,它提出了使用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验(Phi检验)、Cramer V检验和Somers d检验的可能性。