The Pretreatment Tumor Infiltrating T Lymphocytes (CD8 + , CD4 + , FOXP3 + ) and Systemic Neutrophil-Lymphocytes Ratio in Definitively Treated Cervical Cancer Patients: The Correlation to Clinicopathological Factors and Survival

Hala A El-Lathy, Ahlam A Dohal, M. Mashhour
{"title":"The Pretreatment Tumor Infiltrating T Lymphocytes (CD8 + , CD4 + , FOXP3 + ) and Systemic Neutrophil-Lymphocytes Ratio in Definitively Treated Cervical Cancer Patients: The Correlation to Clinicopathological Factors and Survival","authors":"Hala A El-Lathy, Ahlam A Dohal, M. Mashhour","doi":"10.4172/1948-5956.1000528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic potential of pre-treatment tumour infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) (CD8+, CD4+, FOXP3+) and systemic neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting the outcome of definitively treated cervical cancer patients.Methods: Both densities of pre-treatment TILs (CD8+, CD4+, FOXP3+) in cervical biopsies and NLR were correlated with clinicopathological parameters. The prognostic value of pre-treatment TILs and NLR for disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Log rank and Cox regression.Results: The final analysis included 28 had who radical hysterectomy while 20 had definitive concurrent chemoradiation. Elevated CD8+, CD8+/CD4+ and low FOXP3+ were associated with node negative, early stage disease and radical hysterectomies. Conversely, elevated NLR was associated with advanced stages, nodal involvement and definitive chemoradiation. Cox regression multivariate revealed that elevated NLR along with nodal involvement were independently correlated with poor prognosis with hazard ratio (HR 3.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.45-9.24),5.63 (95% CI, 2.61-9.32) for OS and (HR 8.21 (95% CI, 4.21-16.53) and 5.32 (95% CI, 2.37-10.24) for DFS respectively. Additionally, FOXP3+ ≥ 19 and CD8+/CD4+ < 2 were significantly associated with decreased OS (HR 4.37 (95% CI, 2.48-12.37), 2.31 (95% CI, 2.34-9.32) and poorer DFS (HR 3.61 (95% CI, 1.38- 9.32), 4.32 (95% CI,3.12-8.34) respectively.Conclusion: The Pre-treatment NLR, CD8+, FOXP3+ and C8/CD4+ showed a significant association with different clinicopathological prognostic factors in definitively treated cervical cancer patients. Additionally, they may be considered as potential independent prognostic indicators of clinical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":15170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5956.1000528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic potential of pre-treatment tumour infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) (CD8+, CD4+, FOXP3+) and systemic neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting the outcome of definitively treated cervical cancer patients.Methods: Both densities of pre-treatment TILs (CD8+, CD4+, FOXP3+) in cervical biopsies and NLR were correlated with clinicopathological parameters. The prognostic value of pre-treatment TILs and NLR for disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Log rank and Cox regression.Results: The final analysis included 28 had who radical hysterectomy while 20 had definitive concurrent chemoradiation. Elevated CD8+, CD8+/CD4+ and low FOXP3+ were associated with node negative, early stage disease and radical hysterectomies. Conversely, elevated NLR was associated with advanced stages, nodal involvement and definitive chemoradiation. Cox regression multivariate revealed that elevated NLR along with nodal involvement were independently correlated with poor prognosis with hazard ratio (HR 3.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.45-9.24),5.63 (95% CI, 2.61-9.32) for OS and (HR 8.21 (95% CI, 4.21-16.53) and 5.32 (95% CI, 2.37-10.24) for DFS respectively. Additionally, FOXP3+ ≥ 19 and CD8+/CD4+ < 2 were significantly associated with decreased OS (HR 4.37 (95% CI, 2.48-12.37), 2.31 (95% CI, 2.34-9.32) and poorer DFS (HR 3.61 (95% CI, 1.38- 9.32), 4.32 (95% CI,3.12-8.34) respectively.Conclusion: The Pre-treatment NLR, CD8+, FOXP3+ and C8/CD4+ showed a significant association with different clinicopathological prognostic factors in definitively treated cervical cancer patients. Additionally, they may be considered as potential independent prognostic indicators of clinical outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈癌根治患者肿瘤浸润T淋巴细胞(CD8 +、CD4 +、FOXP3 +)及全身中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值:与临床病理因素及生存率的关系
目的:探讨治疗前肿瘤浸润T淋巴细胞(TILs) (CD8+、CD4+、FOXP3+)和全身中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)对宫颈癌患者预后的预测价值。方法:术前宫颈活检和NLR中TILs (CD8+、CD4+、FOXP3+)密度与临床病理参数的相关性。采用Log rank和Cox回归评估治疗前TILs和NLR对无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)的预后价值。结果:28例患者行根治性子宫切除术,20例患者行同步放化疗。CD8+、CD8+/CD4+升高和FOXP3+低与淋巴结阴性、早期疾病和根治性子宫切除术相关。相反,NLR升高与晚期、淋巴结受累和最终放化疗有关。多因素Cox回归分析显示,NLR升高伴淋巴结受累与预后不良独立相关,风险比OS为3.06(95%可信区间[CI], 3.45-9.24)、5.63 (95% CI, 2.61-9.32), DFS为8.21 (95% CI, 4.21-16.53)、5.32 (95% CI, 2.37-10.24)。此外,FOXP3+≥19和CD8+/CD4+ < 2与OS降低(HR 4.37 (95% CI, 2.48-12.37)、2.31 (95% CI, 2.34-9.32)和DFS降低(HR 3.61 (95% CI, 1.38- 9.32)、4.32 (95% CI,3.12-8.34)显著相关。结论:宫颈癌患者治疗前NLR、CD8+、FOXP3+、C8/CD4+与不同临床病理预后因素有显著相关性。此外,它们可能被认为是临床结果的潜在独立预后指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Oxygen and Nitrogen Radicals in the Mechanism of Anticancer Drug Cytotoxicity. Durable Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade Plus Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel in Two Osimertinib-Refractory Patients with EGFR-mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma Significant Role of MCM10 in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Promote Viability and Migration Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy of Human Cancers FLOT1 is a novel target of ovarian cancer for diagnosis and treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1