Beyond measure: using cogenerative dialogues as a formative assessment to improve PBL science internships

P. Hsu, Yi-Yu Liao
{"title":"Beyond measure: using cogenerative dialogues as a formative assessment to improve PBL science internships","authors":"P. Hsu, Yi-Yu Liao","doi":"10.1080/21548455.2022.2089367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Project-based learning has been suggested as an effective student-centered practice to teach science. However, how to assess students’ learning in project-based learning activities remains challenging because of its open-ended nature. In this study of high school students’ science internships, we demonstrated that cogenerative dialogs can serve as a formative assessment to improve teaching and learning in project-based learning activities. Cogenerative dialogs provided a safe and supportive space for respectful and equitable dialogs. In cogenerative dialogs, both instructors and students identified areas for improvements and brainstormed solutions as a team. As a result, students were empowered to speak up their voices and willing to take on the responsibility for their learning. The regular cogenerative dialogs became an effective form of formative assessments to improve both the teaching and learning involved in the science internships. By analyzing these cogenerative dialogs, we identified eight key strategies used by participants in cogenerative dialogs to justify and assess the internship teaching and learning. These key strategies may serve as a framework to observe how instruction revolutions and feedback are intertwined and how students become engaged in assessing themselves and their peers in formative assessments.","PeriodicalId":45375,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","volume":"15 1","pages":"345 - 359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2022.2089367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Project-based learning has been suggested as an effective student-centered practice to teach science. However, how to assess students’ learning in project-based learning activities remains challenging because of its open-ended nature. In this study of high school students’ science internships, we demonstrated that cogenerative dialogs can serve as a formative assessment to improve teaching and learning in project-based learning activities. Cogenerative dialogs provided a safe and supportive space for respectful and equitable dialogs. In cogenerative dialogs, both instructors and students identified areas for improvements and brainstormed solutions as a team. As a result, students were empowered to speak up their voices and willing to take on the responsibility for their learning. The regular cogenerative dialogs became an effective form of formative assessments to improve both the teaching and learning involved in the science internships. By analyzing these cogenerative dialogs, we identified eight key strategies used by participants in cogenerative dialogs to justify and assess the internship teaching and learning. These key strategies may serve as a framework to observe how instruction revolutions and feedback are intertwined and how students become engaged in assessing themselves and their peers in formative assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越测量:使用协同生成对话作为形成性评估,以改善PBL科学实习
基于项目的学习是一种有效的以学生为中心的科学教学方法。然而,如何在基于项目的学习活动中评估学生的学习仍然具有挑战性,因为它具有开放式的性质。通过对高中生科学实习的研究,我们证明了在基于项目的学习活动中,协同生成对话可以作为一种形成性评估来改善教与学。共生对话为尊重和平等的对话提供了一个安全和支持性的空间。在共同生成对话中,教师和学生都确定了需要改进的领域,并作为一个团队集思广益。结果,学生们被授权说出他们的声音,并愿意为他们的学习承担责任。定期的协同生成对话成为一种有效的形成性评估形式,以改善科学实习中的教与学。通过分析这些协同生成对话,我们确定了参与者在协同生成对话中使用的八种关键策略来证明和评估实习教学。这些关键策略可以作为一个框架来观察教学革命和反馈是如何交织在一起的,以及学生是如何在形成性评估中评估自己和同伴的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: International Journal of Science Education Part B: Communication and Public Engagement will address the communication between and the engagement by individuals and groups concerning evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences, of science and technology. The journal will aim: -To bridge the gap between theory and practice concerning the communication of evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences of science and technology; -To address the perspectives on communication about science and technology of individuals and groups of citizens of all ages, scientists and engineers, media persons, industrialists, policy makers, from countries throughout the world; -To promote rational discourse about the role of communication concerning science and technology in private, social, economic and cultural aspects of life
期刊最新文献
A pedagogy for success: two stories from STEM Young children’s agency in the science museum: insights from the use of storytelling in object-rich galleries Public education about ShakeAlert® earthquake early warning: evaluation of an animated video in English and Spanish Virtual reality in astronomy education: reflecting on design principles through a dialogue between researchers and practitioners Collaborative capacity-building for collective evaluation: a case study with informal science education centers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1