Combination of physiological and subjective measures to assess quality of experience for audiovisual technologies

Julie Lassalle, Lætitia Gros, G. Coppin
{"title":"Combination of physiological and subjective measures to assess quality of experience for audiovisual technologies","authors":"Julie Lassalle, Lætitia Gros, G. Coppin","doi":"10.1109/QoMEX.2011.6065692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The competitive context in which the number of new audiovisual services increases requires taking user preferences into account to maintain the best possible quality of experience. The aim of the experiment presented in this paper is to study how standardized ITU subjective measures may be supplemented by physiological measurements. Subjective assessments (ITU-T P.920, P.911) and physiological measurements (Blood Volume Pulse, Temperature, Skin Conductance and Eye Tracking) are collected from 34 subjects viewing three different 2D audiovisual contents. Each content was presented under three different quality conditions: a reference one (without degradation) and two degraded ones (audio/video asynchrony or bitrates variations on audio and/or video). Results show an impact of quality variations on the subjective data but not on physiological measures. It might be explained by this first exploratory protocol (degradation, thresholds, content presentation layout, etc.) proposed to study audiovisual quality impact on physiological activity.","PeriodicalId":6441,"journal":{"name":"2011 Third International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience","volume":"32 1","pages":"13-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Third International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2011.6065692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The competitive context in which the number of new audiovisual services increases requires taking user preferences into account to maintain the best possible quality of experience. The aim of the experiment presented in this paper is to study how standardized ITU subjective measures may be supplemented by physiological measurements. Subjective assessments (ITU-T P.920, P.911) and physiological measurements (Blood Volume Pulse, Temperature, Skin Conductance and Eye Tracking) are collected from 34 subjects viewing three different 2D audiovisual contents. Each content was presented under three different quality conditions: a reference one (without degradation) and two degraded ones (audio/video asynchrony or bitrates variations on audio and/or video). Results show an impact of quality variations on the subjective data but not on physiological measures. It might be explained by this first exploratory protocol (degradation, thresholds, content presentation layout, etc.) proposed to study audiovisual quality impact on physiological activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合生理和主观测量来评估视听技术的体验质量
在新的视听服务数量增加的竞争环境中,需要考虑到用户的偏好,以保持尽可能高的体验质量。本文提出的实验目的是研究如何通过生理测量来补充标准化的ITU主观测量。从观看三种不同2D视听内容的34名受试者中收集主观评估(ITU-T P.920, P.911)和生理测量(血容量脉搏、温度、皮肤电导和眼动追踪)。每个内容在三种不同的质量条件下呈现:一种是参考条件(没有退化),另一种是退化条件(音频/视频异步或音频和/或视频的比特率变化)。结果表明,质量变化对主观数据有影响,但对生理测量没有影响。这可以解释为第一个探索性方案(退化、阈值、内容呈现布局等)提出的研究视听质量对生理活动的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Web Browsing Audio Transmission Evoking Emotions and Evaluating Emotional Impact Quality of Experience Versus User Experience Crowdsourcing in QoE Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1