A Dosimetrical Analysis of the Magnitude of Isocenter Shifts Using CT-on-Rails Guided Online Adaptive Planning for Left Breast Cancer Patients Treated by Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

K. Mashhour, S. Eliteo, W. Hashem
{"title":"A Dosimetrical Analysis of the Magnitude of Isocenter Shifts Using CT-on-Rails Guided Online Adaptive Planning for Left Breast Cancer Patients Treated by Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy","authors":"K. Mashhour, S. Eliteo, W. Hashem","doi":"10.1177/0300891620914164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study was conducted to check the accuracy and validity of an automated adaptive planning (AAP) method which combines automated re-contouring and re-planning to check for inter-fractional anatomical changes in breast cancer patients receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) based on a weekly computed tomography (CT)-on rails images dosimetrically viewing the magnitude of difference in isocenter shifts and the degree of dose deviations regarding target coverage and dose received by organs at risk. Methods and Materials: Twenty left sided conservative breast cancer patients were selected for IMRT treatment. Automatic generation of the contours on each repeat CT image was performed by mapping the contours from the planning CT image using deformable image registration. 3D- CRT and IMRT plans were automatically recalculated for each patient. The magnitude of isocenter shifts in postero-anterior (PA), cranio-caudal (CC) and right-left (RL) directions was calculated and the degree of dose deviations regarding target coverage and dose received by organs at risk. Results: In the PA,CC and RL directions, 9.2%, 11.4% and 6.4% of the 100 CT scans didn’t require any position adjustments. The mean isocenter shifts and standard deviation (SD) were 0.5 & 0.6 +/- 1.1mm, 0.3 &0.4 +/- 0.5mm and 0.2 & 0.4+/- 0.6mm for the IMRT and 3D-CRT plans in the PA,CC and RL directions, respectively. 74.1%, 65.1%, and 55.8% required a shift of 1 - 3 mm; 10.5%, 23.9%, and 33.2% required a shift of 3 - 5mm; and 1.5%, 3.3%, and 5.4% required a shift of more than 5 mm, respectively. With respect to target coverage, the D90[Gy] for the breast CTV was 46.2 Gy and 45.6 for the IMRT and 3D-CRT plans. The mean doses to the heart and left lung were reduced by 5.5 %, 3.7 Gy and 4.1%, 2.6 Gy using the AAP method. Conclusions: The fully automated AAP method using CT on rails for online re-planning was effective in reducing the magnitude of isocenter shifts and compensating for target volume coverage underdosing and higher doses perceived by risk organs caused by anatomical inter-fractional changes in breast cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":23450,"journal":{"name":"Tumori Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"32 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tumori Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0300891620914164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study was conducted to check the accuracy and validity of an automated adaptive planning (AAP) method which combines automated re-contouring and re-planning to check for inter-fractional anatomical changes in breast cancer patients receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) based on a weekly computed tomography (CT)-on rails images dosimetrically viewing the magnitude of difference in isocenter shifts and the degree of dose deviations regarding target coverage and dose received by organs at risk. Methods and Materials: Twenty left sided conservative breast cancer patients were selected for IMRT treatment. Automatic generation of the contours on each repeat CT image was performed by mapping the contours from the planning CT image using deformable image registration. 3D- CRT and IMRT plans were automatically recalculated for each patient. The magnitude of isocenter shifts in postero-anterior (PA), cranio-caudal (CC) and right-left (RL) directions was calculated and the degree of dose deviations regarding target coverage and dose received by organs at risk. Results: In the PA,CC and RL directions, 9.2%, 11.4% and 6.4% of the 100 CT scans didn’t require any position adjustments. The mean isocenter shifts and standard deviation (SD) were 0.5 & 0.6 +/- 1.1mm, 0.3 &0.4 +/- 0.5mm and 0.2 & 0.4+/- 0.6mm for the IMRT and 3D-CRT plans in the PA,CC and RL directions, respectively. 74.1%, 65.1%, and 55.8% required a shift of 1 - 3 mm; 10.5%, 23.9%, and 33.2% required a shift of 3 - 5mm; and 1.5%, 3.3%, and 5.4% required a shift of more than 5 mm, respectively. With respect to target coverage, the D90[Gy] for the breast CTV was 46.2 Gy and 45.6 for the IMRT and 3D-CRT plans. The mean doses to the heart and left lung were reduced by 5.5 %, 3.7 Gy and 4.1%, 2.6 Gy using the AAP method. Conclusions: The fully automated AAP method using CT on rails for online re-planning was effective in reducing the magnitude of isocenter shifts and compensating for target volume coverage underdosing and higher doses perceived by risk organs caused by anatomical inter-fractional changes in breast cancer patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用CT-on-Rails引导在线自适应计划对左乳腺癌患者调强放疗的等中心偏移幅度的剂量学分析
作品简介:本研究旨在验证自动适应规划(AAP)方法的准确性和有效性,该方法结合了自动重新轮廓和重新规划,以检查接受调强放疗(IMRT)的乳腺癌患者的分数间解剖变化,该方法基于每周一次的计算机断层扫描(CT)轨道图像,以剂量学的方式观察等中心移位的差异幅度和剂量偏差程度,涉及目标覆盖和接受的剂量通过处于危险中的器官。方法与材料:选取20例左侧保守性乳腺癌患者进行IMRT治疗。利用可变形配准方法对规划的CT图像进行轮廓映射,自动生成重复CT图像上的轮廓。自动重新计算每位患者的3D- CRT和IMRT计划。计算后前(PA)、颅尾(CC)和左右(RL)方向的等中心偏移幅度,以及靶覆盖和危险器官接受剂量的剂量偏差程度。结果:100次CT扫描中,PA、CC、RL方向不需要调整体位的分别占9.2%、11.4%、6.4%。IMRT和3D-CRT方案在PA、CC和RL方向的平均等中心偏移和标准差(SD)分别为0.5和0.6 +/- 1.1mm, 0.3和0.4+/- 0.5mm和0.2和0.4+/- 0.6mm。74.1%、65.1%和55.8%要求位移1 ~ 3mm;10.5%、23.9%和33.2%要求位移3 - 5mm;1.5%、3.3%和5.4%要求位移大于5mm。在靶覆盖率方面,乳腺CTV的D90[Gy]为46.2 Gy, IMRT和3D-CRT计划的D90[Gy]为45.6。采用AAP法,心脏和左肺的平均剂量分别减少5.5% (3.7 Gy)和4.1% (2.6 Gy)。结论:利用CT在轨道上进行在线重新规划的全自动AAP方法可以有效地减少乳腺癌患者等中心偏移的幅度,并补偿因解剖分数间变化引起的靶体积覆盖不足和风险器官感知的高剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PROACT 2.0: A new open-source tool to improve patient-doctor communication in clinical trials Response to lorlatinib rechallenge in a case of ALK-rearranged metastatic NSCLC with a resistance mutation to second generation TKIs The digital revolution in pathology: Towards a smarter approach to research and treatment The power of art and the powers of adolescents with cancer: Age-specific projects at Italian pediatric oncology centers bgicc 2024 abstracts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1