Are Quotas the Most Suitable Tool to Ensure Equal Representation of Women in Company Boards?

Atanas D. Atanasov
{"title":"Are Quotas the Most Suitable Tool to Ensure Equal Representation of Women in Company Boards?","authors":"Atanas D. Atanasov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2712665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When we look at the corporate structures and more specifically to the corporate boards we will notice that the high levels of the bodies governing the biggest corporations are heavily dominated by men. Whereas in some cases the all-male board room may be justified by either lack of equally qualified and skillful female counterparts, for example, this seems to be the case less and less often. According to some authors, having women in the company boards leads to more stability and more sensible risk – taking, as well as more attention being paid to the long term goals of the company and its shareholders. Therefore, states have been trying to influence the companies to ensure close to equal number of women occupying board positions. A very controversial yet useful tool which the governments have been using is the quotas. In this paper, the author will try to analyze whether or not we need quotas and if they are as effective as we think. Eventually a new more intermediate approach will be briefly suggested.","PeriodicalId":22151,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Corporate Governance (Topic)","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Corporate Governance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2712665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When we look at the corporate structures and more specifically to the corporate boards we will notice that the high levels of the bodies governing the biggest corporations are heavily dominated by men. Whereas in some cases the all-male board room may be justified by either lack of equally qualified and skillful female counterparts, for example, this seems to be the case less and less often. According to some authors, having women in the company boards leads to more stability and more sensible risk – taking, as well as more attention being paid to the long term goals of the company and its shareholders. Therefore, states have been trying to influence the companies to ensure close to equal number of women occupying board positions. A very controversial yet useful tool which the governments have been using is the quotas. In this paper, the author will try to analyze whether or not we need quotas and if they are as effective as we think. Eventually a new more intermediate approach will be briefly suggested.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
配额是确保女性在公司董事会中平等代表的最合适工具吗?
当我们观察公司结构,特别是公司董事会时,我们会注意到,管理最大公司的高层机构在很大程度上由男性主导。例如,在某些情况下,董事会成员全部为男性可能是因为缺乏同样合格和熟练的女性同行,但这种情况似乎越来越少。根据一些作者的说法,让女性进入公司董事会会带来更大的稳定性和更明智的风险承担,也会让公司及其股东更加关注其长期目标。因此,各州一直在努力影响公司,以确保担任董事会职位的女性人数接近相等。政府一直在使用的一个非常有争议但很有用的工具是配额。在本文中,作者将尝试分析我们是否需要配额,如果他们是我们认为有效。最后将简要地提出一种新的更中间的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Portfolio Primacy and Climate Change Does Social Trust Mitigate Insiders’ Opportunistic Behavior? Evidence from Insider Trading The Role of Corporate Governance Failure in the Grenfell Tower Fire Sustaining Competitive Advantage Through Good Governance and Fiscal Controls: Risk Determinants in Internal Controls A Study on Performance Evaluation of Equity Share and Mutual Funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1