A Simulation-Based Heuristic to Find Approximate Equilibria with Disaggregate Demand Models

Stefano Bortolomiol, Virginie Lurkin, M. Bierlaire
{"title":"A Simulation-Based Heuristic to Find Approximate Equilibria with Disaggregate Demand Models","authors":"Stefano Bortolomiol, Virginie Lurkin, M. Bierlaire","doi":"10.1287/trsc.2021.1071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oligopolistic competition occurs in various transportation markets. In this paper, we introduce a framework to find approximate equilibrium solutions of oligopolistic markets in which demand is modeled at the disaggregate level using discrete choice models, according to random utility theory. Compared with aggregate demand models, the added value of discrete choice models is the possibility to account for more complex and precise representations of individual behaviors. Because of the form of the resulting demand functions, there is no guarantee that an equilibrium solution for the given market exists, nor is it possible to rely on derivative-based methods to find one. Therefore, we propose a model-based algorithmic approach to find approximate equilibria, which is structured as follows. A heuristic reduction of the search space is initially performed. Then, a subgame equilibrium problem is solved using a mixed integer optimization model inspired by the fixed-point iteration algorithm. The optimal solution of the subgame is compared against the best responses of all suppliers over the strategy sets of the original game. Best response strategies are added to the restricted problem until all ε-equilibrium conditions are satisfied simultaneously. Numerical experiments show that our methodology can approximate the results of an exact method that finds a pure equilibrium in the case of a multinomial logit model of demand with a single-product offer and homogeneous demand. Furthermore, it succeeds at finding approximate equilibria for two transportation case studies featuring more complex discrete choice models, heterogeneous demand, a multiproduct offer by suppliers, and price differentiation for which no analytical approach exists.","PeriodicalId":23247,"journal":{"name":"Transp. Sci.","volume":"37 1","pages":"1025-1045"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transp. Sci.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2021.1071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Oligopolistic competition occurs in various transportation markets. In this paper, we introduce a framework to find approximate equilibrium solutions of oligopolistic markets in which demand is modeled at the disaggregate level using discrete choice models, according to random utility theory. Compared with aggregate demand models, the added value of discrete choice models is the possibility to account for more complex and precise representations of individual behaviors. Because of the form of the resulting demand functions, there is no guarantee that an equilibrium solution for the given market exists, nor is it possible to rely on derivative-based methods to find one. Therefore, we propose a model-based algorithmic approach to find approximate equilibria, which is structured as follows. A heuristic reduction of the search space is initially performed. Then, a subgame equilibrium problem is solved using a mixed integer optimization model inspired by the fixed-point iteration algorithm. The optimal solution of the subgame is compared against the best responses of all suppliers over the strategy sets of the original game. Best response strategies are added to the restricted problem until all ε-equilibrium conditions are satisfied simultaneously. Numerical experiments show that our methodology can approximate the results of an exact method that finds a pure equilibrium in the case of a multinomial logit model of demand with a single-product offer and homogeneous demand. Furthermore, it succeeds at finding approximate equilibria for two transportation case studies featuring more complex discrete choice models, heterogeneous demand, a multiproduct offer by suppliers, and price differentiation for which no analytical approach exists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于仿真的离散需求模型近似均衡求解方法
寡头垄断竞争存在于各种运输市场。在本文中,我们根据随机效用理论,引入了一个框架来寻找需求在分解水平上使用离散选择模型建模的寡头垄断市场的近似均衡解。与总需求模型相比,离散选择模型的附加价值在于有可能解释更复杂、更精确的个体行为表征。由于所产生的需求函数的形式,不能保证给定市场存在均衡解,也不可能依靠基于衍生的方法来找到一个均衡解。因此,我们提出了一种基于模型的算法方法来寻找近似均衡,其结构如下。首先对搜索空间进行启发式缩减。然后,采用基于不动点迭代算法的混合整数优化模型求解子博弈均衡问题。将子博弈的最优解与原博弈策略集上所有供应商的最佳对策进行比较。在受限问题中加入最优对策,直到同时满足所有ε-均衡条件。数值实验表明,我们的方法可以近似于一种精确方法的结果,该方法可以在具有单一产品提供和均匀需求的多项逻辑模型的情况下找到纯均衡。此外,它成功地找到了两个运输案例研究的近似均衡,这些案例研究具有更复杂的离散选择模型、异质需求、供应商提供的多产品以及不存在分析方法的价格差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Air Quality on Housing Location: A Predictive Dynamic Continuum User-Optimal Approach Transportation in the Sharing Economy Scheduling Vehicles with Spatial Conflicts Differentiated Pricing of Shared Mobility Systems Considering Network Effects Using COVID-19 Data on Vaccine Shipments and Wastage to Inform Modeling and Decision-Making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1