An environmental scan of policies in support of chronic disease self-management in Canada.

C. Liddy, K. Mill
{"title":"An environmental scan of policies in support of chronic disease self-management in Canada.","authors":"C. Liddy, K. Mill","doi":"10.24095/HPCDP.34.1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe evidence supporting chronic disease self-management warrants further attention. Our aim was to identify existing policies, strategies and frameworks that support self-management initiatives.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis descriptive study was conducted as an environmental scan, consisting of an Internet search of government and other publicly available websites, and interviews with jurisdictional representatives identified through the Health Council of Canada and academic networking.\n\n\nRESULTS\nWe interviewed 16 representatives from all provinces and territories in Canada and found 30 publicly available and relevant provincial and national documents. Most provinces and territories have policies that incorporate aspects of chronic disease self-management. Alberta and British Columbia have the most detailed policies. Both feature primary care prominently and are not disease specific. Both also have provincial level implementation of chronic disease self-management programming. Canada's northern territories all lacked specific policies supporting chronic disease self-management despite a significant burden of disease.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nEngaging patients in self-management of their chronic diseases is important and effective. Although most provinces and territories have policies that incorporate aspects of chronic disease self-management, they were often embedded within other initiatives and/or policy documents framed around specific diseases or populations. This approach could limit the potential reach and effect of self-management.","PeriodicalId":50696,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada","volume":"31 6 1","pages":"55-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24095/HPCDP.34.1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The evidence supporting chronic disease self-management warrants further attention. Our aim was to identify existing policies, strategies and frameworks that support self-management initiatives. METHODS This descriptive study was conducted as an environmental scan, consisting of an Internet search of government and other publicly available websites, and interviews with jurisdictional representatives identified through the Health Council of Canada and academic networking. RESULTS We interviewed 16 representatives from all provinces and territories in Canada and found 30 publicly available and relevant provincial and national documents. Most provinces and territories have policies that incorporate aspects of chronic disease self-management. Alberta and British Columbia have the most detailed policies. Both feature primary care prominently and are not disease specific. Both also have provincial level implementation of chronic disease self-management programming. Canada's northern territories all lacked specific policies supporting chronic disease self-management despite a significant burden of disease. CONCLUSION Engaging patients in self-management of their chronic diseases is important and effective. Although most provinces and territories have policies that incorporate aspects of chronic disease self-management, they were often embedded within other initiatives and/or policy documents framed around specific diseases or populations. This approach could limit the potential reach and effect of self-management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大支持慢性病自我管理政策的环境扫描。
支持慢性疾病自我管理的证据值得进一步关注。我们的目标是确定现有的政策、战略和框架,以支持自我管理计划。方法:本描述性研究以环境扫描的方式进行,包括对政府和其他公共网站的互联网搜索,以及通过加拿大卫生委员会和学术网络确定的司法管辖区代表的访谈。结果我们采访了来自加拿大各省和地区的16名代表,并找到了30份公开可用的相关省和国家文件。大多数省和地区都有纳入慢性病自我管理各方面的政策。阿尔伯塔省和不列颠哥伦比亚省的政策最为详细。两者都突出了初级保健,而不是特定疾病。两国都有省级慢性病自我管理规划。加拿大北部地区都缺乏支持慢性病自我管理的具体政策,尽管疾病负担沉重。结论让患者参与慢性疾病的自我管理是重要而有效的。虽然大多数省和地区都有纳入慢性病自我管理各方面的政策,但这些政策往往被纳入围绕特定疾病或人群的其他举措和/或政策文件。这种做法可能限制自我管理的潜在范围和效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada
Chronic Diseases and Injuries in Canada PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Health inequalities associated with neighbourhood deprivation in the Quebec population with hypertension in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Active and safe transportation of elementary-school students: comparative analysis of the risks of injury associated with children travelling by car, walking and cycling between home and school. Developing injury indicators for First Nations and Inuit children and youth in Canada: a modified Delphi approach. Chronic disease and chronic disease risk factors among First Nations, Inuit and Métis populations of northern Canada. Multimorbidity disease clusters in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Caucasian populations in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1