Pangolin: Incremental Hybrid Fuzzing with Polyhedral Path Abstraction

Heqing Huang, Peisen Yao, Rongxin Wu, Qingkai Shi, Charles Zhang
{"title":"Pangolin: Incremental Hybrid Fuzzing with Polyhedral Path Abstraction","authors":"Heqing Huang, Peisen Yao, Rongxin Wu, Qingkai Shi, Charles Zhang","doi":"10.1109/SP40000.2020.00063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hybrid fuzzing, which combines the merits of both fuzzing and concolic execution, has become one of the most important trends in coverage-guided fuzzing techniques. Despite the tremendous research on hybrid fuzzers, we observe that existing techniques are still inefficient. One important reason is that these techniques, which we refer to as non-incremental fuzzers, cache and reuse few computation results and, thus, lose many optimization opportunities. To be incremental, we propose \"polyhedral path abstraction\", which preserves the exploration state in the concolic execution stage and allows more effective mutation and constraint solving over existing techniques. We have implemented our idea as a tool, namely Pangolin, and evaluated it using LAVA-M as well as nine real-world programs. The evaluation results showed that Pangolin outperforms the state-of-the-art fuzzing techniques with the improvement of coverage rate ranging from 10% to 30%. Moreover, Pangolin found 400 more bugs in LAVA-M and discovered 41 unseen bugs with 8 of them assigned with the CVE IDs.","PeriodicalId":6849,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","volume":"17 1","pages":"1613-1627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40000.2020.00063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

Hybrid fuzzing, which combines the merits of both fuzzing and concolic execution, has become one of the most important trends in coverage-guided fuzzing techniques. Despite the tremendous research on hybrid fuzzers, we observe that existing techniques are still inefficient. One important reason is that these techniques, which we refer to as non-incremental fuzzers, cache and reuse few computation results and, thus, lose many optimization opportunities. To be incremental, we propose "polyhedral path abstraction", which preserves the exploration state in the concolic execution stage and allows more effective mutation and constraint solving over existing techniques. We have implemented our idea as a tool, namely Pangolin, and evaluated it using LAVA-M as well as nine real-world programs. The evaluation results showed that Pangolin outperforms the state-of-the-art fuzzing techniques with the improvement of coverage rate ranging from 10% to 30%. Moreover, Pangolin found 400 more bugs in LAVA-M and discovered 41 unseen bugs with 8 of them assigned with the CVE IDs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
穿山甲:基于多面体路径抽象的增量混合模糊
混合模糊测试结合了模糊测试和协同执行的优点,已成为覆盖引导模糊测试技术的重要发展方向之一。尽管对混合模糊器进行了大量的研究,但我们发现现有的技术仍然效率低下。一个重要的原因是,这些技术(我们称之为非增量模糊器)缓存和重用的计算结果很少,因此失去了许多优化机会。为了实现增量,我们提出了“多面体路径抽象”,它保留了在全局执行阶段的探索状态,并允许比现有技术更有效的突变和约束求解。我们已经将我们的想法作为一个工具实现,即穿山甲,并使用LAVA-M和九个现实世界的程序对其进行了评估。评估结果表明,穿山甲的覆盖率提高了10% ~ 30%,优于目前最先进的模糊测试技术。此外,穿山甲在LAVA-M中发现了400多个漏洞,发现了41个未见漏洞,其中8个被分配了CVE id。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unexpected Data Dependency Creation and Chaining: A New Attack to SDN TextExerciser: Feedback-driven Text Input Exercising for Android Applications Ijon: Exploring Deep State Spaces via Fuzzing Efficient and Secure Multiparty Computation from Fixed-Key Block Ciphers EverCrypt: A Fast, Verified, Cross-Platform Cryptographic Provider
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1