The acceptability of a single session family focused approach for children/young people and their parents attending a child and youth mental health service

IF 1.7 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Advances in Mental Health Pub Date : 2018-06-19 DOI:10.1080/18387357.2018.1480398
B. Hoadley, A. Falkov, Neelya Agalawatta
{"title":"The acceptability of a single session family focused approach for children/young people and their parents attending a child and youth mental health service","authors":"B. Hoadley, A. Falkov, Neelya Agalawatta","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2018.1480398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective: This pilot study contributes to the parenting intervention literature by considering the acceptability of a single session, family focused approach using The Family Model in families with two generations of mental ill health attending a child-oriented mental health service. The Family Model provides clinicians with a visual diagram to support a semi-structured conversation between family members with the aim of developing a shared care plan. Service user and clinician experience regarding the acceptability of this intervention is provided. Method: Self-report questionnaire feedback was used to ascertain parent, child/young person and clinician experience following a single session using The Family Model. Feedback was analysed and organised into thematically similar categories and summarised. Results: Of the 43 family members involved, 32 provided feedback. Of the 12 clinicians, 6 provided feedback. Overall experience appeared positive. Key themes reported by family members included improvement in general communication and better shared understanding of the parent and child/young person’s predicament. Clinicians reported utility in developing a relational understanding of the problem and a family focused care plan. Discussion: Preliminary data indicate the acceptability of this single session intervention using The Family Model in a small sample of service users and clinicians in a public sector mental health setting. Further work is required to demonstrate feasibility and clinical utility in larger samples and different settings.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"39 1","pages":"44 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2018.1480398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: This pilot study contributes to the parenting intervention literature by considering the acceptability of a single session, family focused approach using The Family Model in families with two generations of mental ill health attending a child-oriented mental health service. The Family Model provides clinicians with a visual diagram to support a semi-structured conversation between family members with the aim of developing a shared care plan. Service user and clinician experience regarding the acceptability of this intervention is provided. Method: Self-report questionnaire feedback was used to ascertain parent, child/young person and clinician experience following a single session using The Family Model. Feedback was analysed and organised into thematically similar categories and summarised. Results: Of the 43 family members involved, 32 provided feedback. Of the 12 clinicians, 6 provided feedback. Overall experience appeared positive. Key themes reported by family members included improvement in general communication and better shared understanding of the parent and child/young person’s predicament. Clinicians reported utility in developing a relational understanding of the problem and a family focused care plan. Discussion: Preliminary data indicate the acceptability of this single session intervention using The Family Model in a small sample of service users and clinicians in a public sector mental health setting. Further work is required to demonstrate feasibility and clinical utility in larger samples and different settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对参加儿童和青少年心理健康服务的儿童/青少年及其父母采用以家庭为重点的单次会议方法的可接受性
摘要目的:本初步研究考察了两代有精神疾病的家庭在接受以儿童为导向的心理健康服务时,采用以家庭为中心的单次治疗方法的可接受性,为父母干预文献做出贡献。家庭模型为临床医生提供了一个可视化的图表,以支持家庭成员之间的半结构化对话,目的是制定共同的护理计划。提供了服务用户和临床医生关于这种干预的可接受性的经验。方法:采用自我报告式问卷反馈法,通过家庭模型对家长、儿童/青少年和临床医生进行一次治疗后的经验进行调查。反馈被分析并组织成主题相似的类别并进行总结。结果:43名参与调查的家庭成员中,32名提供了反馈。在12名临床医生中,6名提供了反馈。总体体验是积极的。家庭成员报告的主要主题包括改善一般沟通和更好地了解父母和儿童/青少年的困境。临床医生报告了在发展对问题的关系理解和以家庭为重点的护理计划方面的效用。讨论:初步数据表明,在公共部门精神卫生机构的服务使用者和临床医生的小样本中,使用家庭模式进行这种单次干预是可接受的。需要进一步的工作来证明在更大样本和不同环境下的可行性和临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Identity-related problems: direct and indirect associations with emotional intelligence and childhood environment. Patients’ and staff’s experiences of Well-Track physical activity and sleep quality intervention in an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) service Assessment of the implementation of psychological first aid training: adaptation and validation of determinants of the implementation behavior questionnaire Investigating factors that impact on the uptake of Mental Health First Aid Australia’s Conversations About Gambling course: a qualitative study engaging stakeholder perspectives The relationship between mental health and stress: the moderating role of satisfaction with friendships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1