P. I. Len'kin, A. Smetkin, A. Husseyn, E. Fot, A. I. Len’kin, K. Paromov, A. Ushakov, M. A. Krygina, M. Kirov
{"title":"[CONTINUOUS HEMOGLOBIN MONITORING USING PULSE CO-OXIMETRY IN CARDIAC SURGERY.]","authors":"P. I. Len'kin, A. Smetkin, A. Husseyn, E. Fot, A. I. Len’kin, K. Paromov, A. Ushakov, M. A. Krygina, M. Kirov","doi":"10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-329-334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE AIM\nTo assess the accuracy ofcontinuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry and revealfactors affecting the results of the measurements during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\n27 patients undergoing off-pump CABG and 16patients after elective complex (repair or replacement of two or more valves) or combined (valve and coronary artery) cardiac surgery requiring CPB were enrolled into a prospective observational study. Both groups received continuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry (SpHb). During early postoperative period SpHb was compared with hemoglobin concentration in the arterial blood (Hbart).\n\n\nRESULTS\nWefoundpositive correlation between SpHb and Hb in both groups (rho =0,29, p < 0,05 u rho=0,34; p<0.005 respectively). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias ? limits of agreement (?I.96 SD) between the continuously measured hemoglobin and reference arterial blood hemoglobin concentration of -6,0 ? 41,0 g/l in the off-pump group and 7,7 k 31,0 g/l in the CPB group.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nHemoglobin measurement using pulse co-oximetry does not provide acceptable accuracy during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery. Applicability of this technology is influenced by vascular tone, systemic and regional tissue hypoperfusion.","PeriodicalId":7795,"journal":{"name":"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia","volume":"34 1","pages":"329-334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-329-334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
THE AIM
To assess the accuracy ofcontinuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry and revealfactors affecting the results of the measurements during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
27 patients undergoing off-pump CABG and 16patients after elective complex (repair or replacement of two or more valves) or combined (valve and coronary artery) cardiac surgery requiring CPB were enrolled into a prospective observational study. Both groups received continuous hemoglobin monitoring using pulse co-oximetry (SpHb). During early postoperative period SpHb was compared with hemoglobin concentration in the arterial blood (Hbart).
RESULTS
Wefoundpositive correlation between SpHb and Hb in both groups (rho =0,29, p < 0,05 u rho=0,34; p<0.005 respectively). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias ? limits of agreement (?I.96 SD) between the continuously measured hemoglobin and reference arterial blood hemoglobin concentration of -6,0 ? 41,0 g/l in the off-pump group and 7,7 k 31,0 g/l in the CPB group.
CONCLUSIONS
Hemoglobin measurement using pulse co-oximetry does not provide acceptable accuracy during early postoperative period in cardiac surgery. Applicability of this technology is influenced by vascular tone, systemic and regional tissue hypoperfusion.