The effectiveness of distance and traditional teaching natural sciences: A comparative analysis

E. A. Chanchaeva, T. K. Kurilenko, Vitali Olegovich Nedelski, E. Kruglikova, A. Grjibovski
{"title":"The effectiveness of distance and traditional teaching natural sciences: A comparative analysis","authors":"E. A. Chanchaeva, T. K. Kurilenko, Vitali Olegovich Nedelski, E. Kruglikova, A. Grjibovski","doi":"10.15293/2658-6762.2203.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article focuses on the problem of the effectiveness of distance learning. The most recent pandemic has led to the widespread use of distance learning as an alternative to the traditional classroom instruction. However, there is no consensus on whether distance education is superior to the traditional teaching in terms of learning outcomes and perception. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of teaching natural sciences in distance and traditional modes. Materials and Methods. The data were collected via the following general research methods: synthesis and generalization of scholarly literature on the problem, empirical methods including surveys and interviews, and comparative analysis of research findings. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of distance learning and traditional classroom instruction was conducted relying on the results of teaching natural science disciplines at Gorno-Altaisk State University in the period of 2020-2022, synthesis and analysis of international and Russian studies on the problem. Results. The authors identified the disadvantages and advantages of distance learning with the main focus on natural science disciplines. It has been found that laboratory assignments performed in a distance mode changed the student’s role from being a researcher to the role of an observer. Moreover, there was a decrease in the development of practical skills. Within the framework of traditional learning, the teacher acts as a mentor responsible for enhancing students’ knowledge, for nurturing the culture of behavior while the teacher’s role in distance education is that of a mediator facilitating students’ independent learning. It should also be noted that within distance learning environment teachers cannot perform a range of professional functions beyond educational. As far as final assessment is concerned, it must be emphasized that it can be extremely difficult to conduct objective assessment of students’ knowledge and competencies in a distance learning environment. On the other hand, the advantages of assessment via electronic and online media include flexibility and convenience. Conclusions. The authors conclude that nowadays the effectiveness of teaching natural sciences in the distance learning environment is lower than in the traditional one. In order to increase its efficiency, it is necessary to improve digital technologies and develop new teaching methods suitable for the distance learning environment. The limitations of distance learning include decrease in students’ learning outcomes, objectivity of final assessment, and partial implementation of moral education activities.","PeriodicalId":21621,"journal":{"name":"Science for Education Today","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science for Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2203.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article focuses on the problem of the effectiveness of distance learning. The most recent pandemic has led to the widespread use of distance learning as an alternative to the traditional classroom instruction. However, there is no consensus on whether distance education is superior to the traditional teaching in terms of learning outcomes and perception. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of teaching natural sciences in distance and traditional modes. Materials and Methods. The data were collected via the following general research methods: synthesis and generalization of scholarly literature on the problem, empirical methods including surveys and interviews, and comparative analysis of research findings. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of distance learning and traditional classroom instruction was conducted relying on the results of teaching natural science disciplines at Gorno-Altaisk State University in the period of 2020-2022, synthesis and analysis of international and Russian studies on the problem. Results. The authors identified the disadvantages and advantages of distance learning with the main focus on natural science disciplines. It has been found that laboratory assignments performed in a distance mode changed the student’s role from being a researcher to the role of an observer. Moreover, there was a decrease in the development of practical skills. Within the framework of traditional learning, the teacher acts as a mentor responsible for enhancing students’ knowledge, for nurturing the culture of behavior while the teacher’s role in distance education is that of a mediator facilitating students’ independent learning. It should also be noted that within distance learning environment teachers cannot perform a range of professional functions beyond educational. As far as final assessment is concerned, it must be emphasized that it can be extremely difficult to conduct objective assessment of students’ knowledge and competencies in a distance learning environment. On the other hand, the advantages of assessment via electronic and online media include flexibility and convenience. Conclusions. The authors conclude that nowadays the effectiveness of teaching natural sciences in the distance learning environment is lower than in the traditional one. In order to increase its efficiency, it is necessary to improve digital technologies and develop new teaching methods suitable for the distance learning environment. The limitations of distance learning include decrease in students’ learning outcomes, objectivity of final assessment, and partial implementation of moral education activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自然科学远程教学与传统教学效果的比较分析
介绍。本文主要研究远程教育的有效性问题。最近的大流行导致广泛使用远程学习作为传统课堂教学的替代方法。然而,远程教育在学习效果和感知方面是否优于传统教学尚无共识。本研究的目的是比较远程自然科学教学与传统教学模式的有效性。材料与方法。数据收集的一般研究方法是:综合和概括有关问题的学术文献,调查和访谈等实证方法,以及对研究结果的比较分析。本文以戈尔诺-阿尔塔伊斯克国立大学2020-2022年自然科学学科教学成果为基础,综合分析国际和俄罗斯对这一问题的研究,对远程教育与传统课堂教学的有效性进行了对比分析。结果。作者指出了远程学习的缺点和优点,主要集中在自然科学学科。研究发现,在远程模式下进行的实验作业使学生的角色从研究者转变为观察者。此外,实用技能的发展也有所减少。在传统学习的框架中,教师扮演着导师的角色,负责提升学生的知识,培育行为文化,而在远程教育中,教师的角色是促进学生自主学习的中介。还应该指出,在远程学习环境中,教师不能履行教育以外的一系列专业职能。就最终评估而言,必须强调的是,在远程学习环境中对学生的知识和能力进行客观评估是极其困难的。另一方面,通过电子和网络媒体进行评估的优点包括灵活性和便利性。结论。作者认为,目前远程教学环境下的自然科学教学效果低于传统教学环境。为了提高其效率,必须改进数字技术,开发适合远程学习环境的新教学方法。远程教育的局限性包括学生学习成果的下降、最终评价的客观性、德育活动的局部实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Objective assessment of learning outcomes: Peculiarities of design and application of assessment tools in modern conditions of digital development Evaluating the functions of the teacher-producer for preparing prospective economists in the modern context of education system digitalization Professional education as a way to discover the multi-dimensional integrity of a human Research into the capacities of the global digital environment for obtaining cultural and conceptual information at institutional and individual levels Actor-network interpretation of phenomena and current issues of education: The historicist grounds and specificity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1