Comparative Study of Predictive Value for Different Risk Scores forPredicting Contrast Induced Nephropathy and Short Outcome afterPrimary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

M. Mokarrab, A. Ismail, M. Mostafa, Abdelrahman Elgendy, H. Sabry, A. Yousry
{"title":"Comparative Study of Predictive Value for Different Risk Scores forPredicting Contrast Induced Nephropathy and Short Outcome afterPrimary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention","authors":"M. Mokarrab, A. Ismail, M. Mostafa, Abdelrahman Elgendy, H. Sabry, A. Yousry","doi":"10.4172/2155-9880.1000535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Meticulous risk stratification for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is important for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). \nAim of the work: To compare between different risk scores for predicting contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and short outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. \nMaterials and methods: We prospectively enrolled 100 patients who presented with STEMI and treated with Primary PCI. Mehran, Gao, Chen, ACEF or AGEF (age, serum creatinine, or glomerular filtration rate, and ejection fraction); and GRACE (Global Registry for Acute Coronary Events) risk scores were calculated for each patient. The predictive accuracy of the 6 scores for CIN, in-hospital death and major adverse clinical events (MACEs) were assessed by Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. CIN was defined as an absolute increase of serum creatinine by ≥ 0.5 mg/dl or a relative increase of serum creatinine by ≥ 25% from baseline value, at 48-72 h following the exposure to contrast media (CM). The data was analyzed using Chi-square test using SPSS (Statistical package for social science) software. \nResults: All risk scores had relatively good predictive accuracy for CIN (Area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.671 to 0.829) and performed well for prediction of in-hospital death (AUC ranged from 0.838 to 0.973) and MACEs (AUC ranged from 0.815 to 0.926). The Mehran and Gao risk scores had better predictive accuracy for CIN. While Mehran and GRACE risk scores had better predictive accuracy for in-hospital death and MACEs. \nConclusion: Risk scores for predicting CIN perform well in stratifying the risk of CIN, in-hospital death and MACEs in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI. The Gao, Mehran risk scores appear to have greater predictive value for CIN. While GRACE and Mehran scores had highest predictive accuracy for in hospital death and MACEs than the other risk scores.","PeriodicalId":15504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.1000535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Meticulous risk stratification for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is important for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Aim of the work: To compare between different risk scores for predicting contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and short outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Materials and methods: We prospectively enrolled 100 patients who presented with STEMI and treated with Primary PCI. Mehran, Gao, Chen, ACEF or AGEF (age, serum creatinine, or glomerular filtration rate, and ejection fraction); and GRACE (Global Registry for Acute Coronary Events) risk scores were calculated for each patient. The predictive accuracy of the 6 scores for CIN, in-hospital death and major adverse clinical events (MACEs) were assessed by Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. CIN was defined as an absolute increase of serum creatinine by ≥ 0.5 mg/dl or a relative increase of serum creatinine by ≥ 25% from baseline value, at 48-72 h following the exposure to contrast media (CM). The data was analyzed using Chi-square test using SPSS (Statistical package for social science) software. Results: All risk scores had relatively good predictive accuracy for CIN (Area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.671 to 0.829) and performed well for prediction of in-hospital death (AUC ranged from 0.838 to 0.973) and MACEs (AUC ranged from 0.815 to 0.926). The Mehran and Gao risk scores had better predictive accuracy for CIN. While Mehran and GRACE risk scores had better predictive accuracy for in-hospital death and MACEs. Conclusion: Risk scores for predicting CIN perform well in stratifying the risk of CIN, in-hospital death and MACEs in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI. The Gao, Mehran risk scores appear to have greater predictive value for CIN. While GRACE and Mehran scores had highest predictive accuracy for in hospital death and MACEs than the other risk scores.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同风险评分对初步经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后造影剂肾病和短期预后预测价值的比较研究
背景:对于st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)并接受原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的患者,对造影剂肾病(CIN)进行细致的风险分层是很重要的。研究目的:比较不同风险评分对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后造影剂肾病(CIN)和短期预后的预测价值。材料和方法:我们前瞻性地招募了100例STEMI患者并接受了初级PCI治疗。Mehran, Gao, Chen, ACEF或AGEF(年龄,血清肌酐,或肾小球滤过率,射血分数);计算每位患者的GRACE(全球急性冠状动脉事件登记)风险评分。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估6项评分对CIN、院内死亡和主要临床不良事件(mace)的预测准确性。CIN定义为暴露于造影剂(CM)后48-72小时,血清肌酐绝对升高≥0.5 mg/dl或血清肌酐相对升高≥25%。采用SPSS (Statistical package for social science)软件对数据进行卡方检验。结果:各风险评分对CIN(曲线下面积(Area under curve, AUC)为0.671 ~ 0.829)有较好的预测准确度,对院内死亡(AUC为0.838 ~ 0.973)和mace (AUC为0.815 ~ 0.926)有较好的预测准确度。Mehran和Gao风险评分对CIN有更好的预测准确性。而Mehran和GRACE风险评分对院内死亡和mace有更好的预测准确性。结论:预测CIN的风险评分对STEMI患者行PPCI的CIN、院内死亡和mace的风险有较好的分层效果。Gao、Mehran风险评分似乎对CIN有更大的预测价值。而GRACE和Mehran评分对院内死亡和mace的预测准确性高于其他风险评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A andbeta;-Blocker may be Effective on Ventricular Contractile Mechanisms in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved, but not Reduced, Ejection Fraction MitraClip therapy: Rules do not change; Annuloplasty ring is a must Effects of Previous Percutaneous Coronary Artery Interventions (PCI) on Myocardial Functions Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Should Previous PCI be Included in the Euroscore? Acute aortic syndromes: What do we know? Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis Assessment Using Multi Detector Computed Tomography and its Correlation with Framingham Risk Score among Symptomatic Patients with Chest Pain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1