Differences in the risk profiles and risk perception of flammable liquid hazards in San Luis Potosi, Mexico

Claudia Yazmín Ortega Montoya, Alfredo Ávila Galarza, Roberto Briones Gallardo, Israel Razo Soto, Ricardo Medina Cerda
{"title":"Differences in the risk profiles and risk perception of flammable liquid hazards in San Luis Potosi, Mexico","authors":"Claudia Yazmín Ortega Montoya,&nbsp;Alfredo Ávila Galarza,&nbsp;Roberto Briones Gallardo,&nbsp;Israel Razo Soto,&nbsp;Ricardo Medina Cerda","doi":"10.1016/j.csfs.2014.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The pace of urbanization and industrialization in developing countries is rapidly increasing. Unfortunately, regulatory and private-sector control of hazards has not always kept pace. This work identifies the level of emergency preparedness in chemical industries and evaluates the spatial distribution of hazards using a worst-case release scenario. Consequently, we identified potentially exposed urban communities and evaluated the social perception of a hazard. This research characterizes risk scenarios in a case study of the industrial area in San Luis Potosi, Mexico. Intervention zones of major concern are recognized when deficiencies in emergency preparedness join a poor social perception of hazards in communities that are potentially exposed. The worst-case scenario radii of flammable chemicals range from 425<!--> <!-->m to 733<!--> <!-->m. Potentially exposed communities have a limited perception of chemical risk and no training in emergency response. Proximity to an industrial area influences communities towards a better recognition of hazards. However, communities far from the industrial area have higher exposure to low preparedness worst-case scenarios for flammable chemicals and have a larger level of vulnerability because of their lack of risk perception.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100219,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Fire Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.csfs.2014.10.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Fire Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214398X14000090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The pace of urbanization and industrialization in developing countries is rapidly increasing. Unfortunately, regulatory and private-sector control of hazards has not always kept pace. This work identifies the level of emergency preparedness in chemical industries and evaluates the spatial distribution of hazards using a worst-case release scenario. Consequently, we identified potentially exposed urban communities and evaluated the social perception of a hazard. This research characterizes risk scenarios in a case study of the industrial area in San Luis Potosi, Mexico. Intervention zones of major concern are recognized when deficiencies in emergency preparedness join a poor social perception of hazards in communities that are potentially exposed. The worst-case scenario radii of flammable chemicals range from 425 m to 733 m. Potentially exposed communities have a limited perception of chemical risk and no training in emergency response. Proximity to an industrial area influences communities towards a better recognition of hazards. However, communities far from the industrial area have higher exposure to low preparedness worst-case scenarios for flammable chemicals and have a larger level of vulnerability because of their lack of risk perception.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
墨西哥圣路易斯波托西可燃液体危险的风险概况和风险认知差异
发展中国家城市化和工业化的步伐正在迅速加快。不幸的是,监管机构和私营部门对危害的控制并不总是与之同步。这项工作确定了化学工业的应急准备水平,并利用最坏情况释放情景评估了危害的空间分布。因此,我们确定了潜在暴露的城市社区,并评估了危害的社会认知。本研究以墨西哥圣路易斯波托西工业区为例,描述了风险情景。当应急准备的不足加上社会对潜在危险社区的不良认识时,就会认识到重大关切的干预区。可燃性化学品的最坏情况半径为425m ~ 733m。可能受到接触的社区对化学品风险的认识有限,也没有接受过应急培训。靠近工业区会影响社区更好地认识危害。然而,远离工业区的社区对可燃化学品的最坏情况的准备程度较低,并且由于缺乏风险认知,他们的脆弱性更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial board On the problem of ventilation control in case of a tunnel fire event Fire behaviour of gypsum plasterboard wall assemblies: CFD simulation of a full-scale residential building The effects of cultural differences between the us and saudi arabia on emergency evacuation—Analysis of self reported recogntion/reaction times and cognitive state Using correlative data analysis to develop weather index that estimates the risk of forest fires in Lebanon & Mediterranean: Assessment versus prevalent meteorological indices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1