Bringing the right to water into the spotlight: A civil right before the European Court of Human Rights?

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law Pub Date : 2022-01-12 DOI:10.1111/reel.12429
H. Keller, Angela Hefti
{"title":"Bringing the right to water into the spotlight: A civil right before the European Court of Human Rights?","authors":"H. Keller, Angela Hefti","doi":"10.1111/reel.12429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article evaluates the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) approach to the right to water, drawing on three key aspects characterizing a minimum core right to water: quality, availability and accessibility. The article argues that the right to water should be seen as a civil right, which can be directly enforced by the ECtHR, rather than being adjudicated as a programmatic right subject to a wide margin of appreciation. Currently, the Court pursues two tracks in water‐related cases. On the one hand, it considers the right to water as a right that should be realized progressively and is subject to a wide margin of appreciation. On the other hand, in relation to prisoner and asylum seekers' rights, the Court has recognized that limited access to water can constitute ill treatment contrary to Article 3. Finally, the right to water faces obstacles to its adequate enforcement before the Court as litigants must show that they are victims of water‐related damage and they suffer individually. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)","PeriodicalId":51681,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article evaluates the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) approach to the right to water, drawing on three key aspects characterizing a minimum core right to water: quality, availability and accessibility. The article argues that the right to water should be seen as a civil right, which can be directly enforced by the ECtHR, rather than being adjudicated as a programmatic right subject to a wide margin of appreciation. Currently, the Court pursues two tracks in water‐related cases. On the one hand, it considers the right to water as a right that should be realized progressively and is subject to a wide margin of appreciation. On the other hand, in relation to prisoner and asylum seekers' rights, the Court has recognized that limited access to water can constitute ill treatment contrary to Article 3. Finally, the right to water faces obstacles to its adequate enforcement before the Court as litigants must show that they are victims of water‐related damage and they suffer individually. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将用水权置于聚光灯下:欧洲人权法院面前的一项公民权利?
本文评估了欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)对水权的处理方法,借鉴了表征水权最低核心的三个关键方面:质量、可得性和可及性。这篇文章认为,水权应该被视为一项公民权利,可以由欧洲人权法院直接执行,而不是被裁定为一项具有广泛增值余地的程序性权利。目前,最高法院在与水有关的案件中采取两条途径。一方面,它认为水权是一项应逐步实现的权利,并有很大的升值余地。另一方面,关于囚犯和寻求庇护者的权利,法院认识到,获得水的机会有限可能构成违反第3条的虐待。最后,由于诉讼当事人必须证明他们是与水有关的损害的受害者,并且他们个人遭受损失,因此在法院充分执行水权面临障碍。《欧洲比较与国际环境法评论》版权归Wiley-Blackwell所有,未经版权所有者明确书面许可,其内容不得复制或通过电子邮件发送到多个网站或发布到listserv。但是,用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用。这可以删节。对副本的准确性不作任何保证。用户应参阅原始出版版本的材料的完整。(版权适用于所有人。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
National discretion or broadening acceptable interpretation? A comparative overview of the transposition and implementation of the Water Framework Directive The Czech Republic v Poland (Mine de Turów): Politics and implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive The awkward relations between EU innovation policies and environmental law Towards the adoption of climate change acts in the Visegrad Group countries A quasi‐normative conflict: Resolving the tension between investment treaties and climate action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1