Psychometric Characteristics of the Persian Version of the Opiate Dosage Adequacy Scale (ODAS).

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Project Management Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.32598/bcn.2023.2756.1
Abdollah Golnezhad, Anahita Torkaman-Boutorabi, Emran Mohammad Razaghi, Mohammad Reza Zarrindast, Sara Yadollahi, Parviz Dousti Kataj, Nasim Vousooghi
{"title":"Psychometric Characteristics of the Persian Version of the Opiate Dosage Adequacy Scale (ODAS).","authors":"Abdollah Golnezhad, Anahita Torkaman-Boutorabi, Emran Mohammad Razaghi, Mohammad Reza Zarrindast, Sara Yadollahi, Parviz Dousti Kataj, Nasim Vousooghi","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2023.2756.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The opiate dosage adequacy scale (ODAS) is one of the most common assessment tools in studies on substance use disorders, which evaluates the \"adequacy\" of opiate medication doses in individuals recruited in maintenance approaches. There is no investigation on the Persian version of this questionnaire in Iran. This research validated a Persian version of the ODAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Persian version of the ODAS was translated and revised based on the original scale presented by González-Saiz et al. The psychometric characteristics of the ODAS were assessed via direct interviews. Three trained interviewers questioned 250 patients treated in methadone maintenance clinics in Mazandaran Province (Northern Iran) for more than three months. Internal consistency and factor analysis were conducted using SPSS software, version 24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal consistency of ODAS was satisfactory (Cronbach's α=0.81). Across all items, considerable inter-rater reliability was discovered (kappa values between 0.90 and 1). A four-component structure was produced by the factor analysis that accounted for 77.5% of the total variance. Cronbach's α coefficients of the four components of Heroin craving and overmedication, Consumption, objective opiate withdrawal symptoms, and subjective opiate withdrawal symptoms were 0.84, 0.91, 0.83, and 0.74, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reliability and validity of the Persian version of the ODAS were satisfactory in a sample of methadone maintenance subjects.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>The opiate dosage adequacy scale (ODAS) is a clinical tool for measuring the adequacy of methadone dosesThe Persian version of ODAS has good validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability;The Persian version of the ODAS, as a valid and reliable tool, can be used for the Iranian people under methadone maintenance.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>In Iran, opioids are among the most common forms of illicit drugs. In opioid maintenance programs, the adequacy of methadone doses has an important effect on treatment outcomes. Clinicians typically assess the adequacy of doses based on the patient's response to the medication. Different tools are used in clinical studies to evaluate it. One of these tools is the ODAS, developed by González-Saiz et al. In the present study, we validated the Persian version of the ODAS for Iranian patients receiving methadone maintenance programs. The results confirmed the four-factor structure of the Persian ODAS and showed its good internal consistency and inter-rater reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"13 1","pages":"471-478"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10693811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2023.2756.1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The opiate dosage adequacy scale (ODAS) is one of the most common assessment tools in studies on substance use disorders, which evaluates the "adequacy" of opiate medication doses in individuals recruited in maintenance approaches. There is no investigation on the Persian version of this questionnaire in Iran. This research validated a Persian version of the ODAS.

Methods: The Persian version of the ODAS was translated and revised based on the original scale presented by González-Saiz et al. The psychometric characteristics of the ODAS were assessed via direct interviews. Three trained interviewers questioned 250 patients treated in methadone maintenance clinics in Mazandaran Province (Northern Iran) for more than three months. Internal consistency and factor analysis were conducted using SPSS software, version 24.

Results: The internal consistency of ODAS was satisfactory (Cronbach's α=0.81). Across all items, considerable inter-rater reliability was discovered (kappa values between 0.90 and 1). A four-component structure was produced by the factor analysis that accounted for 77.5% of the total variance. Cronbach's α coefficients of the four components of Heroin craving and overmedication, Consumption, objective opiate withdrawal symptoms, and subjective opiate withdrawal symptoms were 0.84, 0.91, 0.83, and 0.74, respectively.

Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the Persian version of the ODAS were satisfactory in a sample of methadone maintenance subjects.

Highlights: The opiate dosage adequacy scale (ODAS) is a clinical tool for measuring the adequacy of methadone dosesThe Persian version of ODAS has good validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability;The Persian version of the ODAS, as a valid and reliable tool, can be used for the Iranian people under methadone maintenance.

Plain language summary: In Iran, opioids are among the most common forms of illicit drugs. In opioid maintenance programs, the adequacy of methadone doses has an important effect on treatment outcomes. Clinicians typically assess the adequacy of doses based on the patient's response to the medication. Different tools are used in clinical studies to evaluate it. One of these tools is the ODAS, developed by González-Saiz et al. In the present study, we validated the Persian version of the ODAS for Iranian patients receiving methadone maintenance programs. The results confirmed the four-factor structure of the Persian ODAS and showed its good internal consistency and inter-rater reliability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波斯语版阿片剂量适当性量表(ODAS)的心理测量特征。
前言:阿片剂量充足性量表(ODAS)是物质使用障碍研究中最常用的评估工具之一,用于评估维持方法招募的个体阿片药物剂量的“充足性”。在伊朗没有对该问卷的波斯语版本进行调查。这项研究证实了波斯语版的ODAS。方法:根据González-Saiz等人提供的原始量表,对波斯语版ODAS进行翻译和修订。通过直接访谈对ODAS的心理测量特征进行评估。三名训练有素的采访者询问了在Mazandaran省(伊朗北部)美沙酮维持诊所接受治疗超过三个月的250名患者。采用SPSS 24版软件进行内部一致性和因子分析。结果:ODAS内部一致性良好(Cronbach’s α=0.81)。在所有项目中,发现了相当大的评级间信度(kappa值在0.90和1之间)。因子分析产生了一个四成分结构,占总方差的77.5%。海洛因渴望和过度用药、消费、客观阿片戒断症状和主观阿片戒断症状四个成分的Cronbach’s α系数分别为0.84、0.91、0.83和0.74。结论:波斯语版ODAS在美沙酮维持患者中具有良好的信度和效度。重点:阿片剂量充足度量表(ODAS)是一种衡量美沙酮剂量充足性的临床工具,波斯语版ODAS具有良好的效度、内部一致性和间信度;波斯语版ODAS作为一种有效可靠的工具,可用于美沙酮维持期伊朗人群。简明扼要:在伊朗,阿片类药物是最常见的非法药物之一。在阿片类药物维持计划中,美沙酮剂量的充足性对治疗结果有重要影响。临床医生通常根据患者对药物的反应来评估剂量的适当性。临床研究中使用了不同的工具来评估它。其中一个工具是由González-Saiz等人开发的ODAS。在本研究中,我们对接受美沙酮维持计划的伊朗患者验证了波斯语版本的ODAS。结果证实了波斯ODAS的四因子结构,并显示出良好的内部一致性和量表间信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Empowering project team to perform: Directive and facilitative antecedents When project outcomes matter: Organizational integration in managing long-term target benefits Governance mechanisms and practices in project-based interorganisational collaboration for innovation Lifecycles, processes, and practices in strategic projects and programs Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1