Gentz und Stein. Zum Verhältnis zweier Antipoden auf dem Wiener Kongress

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HISTORISCHE FORSCHUNG Pub Date : 2017-04-19 DOI:10.3790/zhf.44.1.35
H. Duchhardt
{"title":"Gentz und Stein. Zum Verhältnis zweier Antipoden auf dem Wiener Kongress","authors":"H. Duchhardt","doi":"10.3790/zhf.44.1.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Gentz and Stein. The Relationship of Two Opposites at the Congress of Vienna Of nearly the same age, but of different social and regional origin, Friedrich Gentz and Baron Karl vom Stein first met in the late 1790 s when they were both in Prussian service and had similar political convictions. But it was a difficult relationship from the very beginning because of their fundamentally different ways of life and social conduct. When they met again in Vienna they were both now in the service of non-Prussian states: Gentz, the Austrian „Secretary of Europe“, was a key figure at the Congress, whereas Stein, the adviser of the Russian Emperor, had a rather modest role. Furthermore, they had quite opposite convictions as far as the future of Germany and Europe was concerned. They met very rarely and incidentally at one of the numberless social gatherings convened by other representatives, but refused to discuss their political opinions and viewpoints in any real dialogue. The liberal positions Stein fough...","PeriodicalId":54000,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HISTORISCHE FORSCHUNG","volume":"161 1","pages":"35-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR HISTORISCHE FORSCHUNG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/zhf.44.1.35","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Gentz and Stein. The Relationship of Two Opposites at the Congress of Vienna Of nearly the same age, but of different social and regional origin, Friedrich Gentz and Baron Karl vom Stein first met in the late 1790 s when they were both in Prussian service and had similar political convictions. But it was a difficult relationship from the very beginning because of their fundamentally different ways of life and social conduct. When they met again in Vienna they were both now in the service of non-Prussian states: Gentz, the Austrian „Secretary of Europe“, was a key figure at the Congress, whereas Stein, the adviser of the Russian Emperor, had a rather modest role. Furthermore, they had quite opposite convictions as far as the future of Germany and Europe was concerned. They met very rarely and incidentally at one of the numberless social gatherings convened by other representatives, but refused to discuss their political opinions and viewpoints in any real dialogue. The liberal positions Stein fough...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让我们假定。和维也纳会议上两大安眠药之间的关系
根茨和斯坦。弗里德里希·根茨和卡尔·冯·施泰因男爵年龄几乎相同,但社会背景和地域背景不同,他们第一次见面是在18世纪90年代末,当时他们都在普鲁士服役,有着相似的政治信念。但这段关系从一开始就很艰难因为他们的生活方式和社会行为根本不同。当他们在维也纳再次会面时,他们都在为非普鲁士国家服务:奥地利的“欧洲秘书”根茨是会议上的关键人物,而俄罗斯皇帝的顾问施泰因则扮演着相当温和的角色。此外,就德国和欧洲的未来而言,他们的信念截然相反。他们很少在其他代表召集的无数社交聚会中偶然见面,但拒绝在任何真正的对话中讨论他们的政治意见和观点。斯坦坚持的自由主义立场……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Das Arbeitsgebiet der ZHF umfaßt die europäische Geschichte etwa vom 13. bis 19. Jahrhundert. Neben der politischen Geschichte werden in besonderem Maße auch Rechtsgeschichte, Kulturgeschichte sowie Sozialgeschichte berücksichtigt. Neuerscheinungen zu den genannten Gebieten werden in einem umfangreichen Rezensionsteil besprochen.
期刊最新文献
Die Autonomiestädte der Frühen Neuzeit „Souveränitätskrise“ und dauerhafte Kontrolle des „Vorfeldes“? Die Hochphase des deutschen Versklavungshandels Nur mit Papier, Feder und Wachs „Darzu mancher Mann sich viel zu schwach unnd zu wenig Befinden wu‍[e]‌rde“
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1