The influence of the dried blood spot drying time on the recoveries of six immunosuppressants

R. Koster, Rixt Botma, B. Greijdanus, D. Uges, J. Kosterink, J. Alffenaar, D. Touw
{"title":"The influence of the dried blood spot drying time on the recoveries of six immunosuppressants","authors":"R. Koster, Rixt Botma, B. Greijdanus, D. Uges, J. Kosterink, J. Alffenaar, D. Touw","doi":"10.17145/JAB.15.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main advantages of DBS sampling is that it allows the patient to sample at home and send the DBS sample to the laboratory by mail [1-4]. This sampling is considered to be patient friendly because it is less invasive and saves patients transportation costs and time. DBS sampling also has a lower biohazard risk and requires a smaller amount of blood than venous sampling [2,4]. Solid organ transplant recipients are required to use a lifetime of immunosuppressant medications like tacrolimus (TaC), sirolimus (SiR), everolimus (EvE) and cyclosporin A (CyA) to prevent allograft rejection. Bioanalysis and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of these drugs are necessary because efficacy and toxicity is associated with blood concentrations and/or pharmacokinetic parameters. Therefore, these patients could greatly benefit from immunosuppressant DBS analysis. Since the use of dried blood spot (DBS) analysis for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), more extensive validation procedures have been proposed in order to improve the quality of the analysis results. Variations of the hematocrit value, spot volume and DBS stability are among the parameters that should be investigated during method validation [1,5]. A perhaps unappreciated source of variability may be the drying time of a dried blood spot sample. After collection of the blood on the DBS card it should be dried dried at ambient temperature. It is already suggested by the European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF) that the required drying time may be influenced by the hematocrit (HT) and that this may affect the robustness and reproducibility of the assay [5]. Consequently it is recommended to investigate these parameters as part of the validation [5]. Although the DBS may appear dry after 3 hours, the extraction recoveries of the substances within the DBS JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOANALYSIS, October 2015, p. 116-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.17145/jab.15.019 (ISSN 2405-710X) Vol. 1, No. 4","PeriodicalId":15014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Bioanalysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Bioanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17145/JAB.15.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

One of the main advantages of DBS sampling is that it allows the patient to sample at home and send the DBS sample to the laboratory by mail [1-4]. This sampling is considered to be patient friendly because it is less invasive and saves patients transportation costs and time. DBS sampling also has a lower biohazard risk and requires a smaller amount of blood than venous sampling [2,4]. Solid organ transplant recipients are required to use a lifetime of immunosuppressant medications like tacrolimus (TaC), sirolimus (SiR), everolimus (EvE) and cyclosporin A (CyA) to prevent allograft rejection. Bioanalysis and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of these drugs are necessary because efficacy and toxicity is associated with blood concentrations and/or pharmacokinetic parameters. Therefore, these patients could greatly benefit from immunosuppressant DBS analysis. Since the use of dried blood spot (DBS) analysis for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), more extensive validation procedures have been proposed in order to improve the quality of the analysis results. Variations of the hematocrit value, spot volume and DBS stability are among the parameters that should be investigated during method validation [1,5]. A perhaps unappreciated source of variability may be the drying time of a dried blood spot sample. After collection of the blood on the DBS card it should be dried dried at ambient temperature. It is already suggested by the European Bioanalysis Forum (EBF) that the required drying time may be influenced by the hematocrit (HT) and that this may affect the robustness and reproducibility of the assay [5]. Consequently it is recommended to investigate these parameters as part of the validation [5]. Although the DBS may appear dry after 3 hours, the extraction recoveries of the substances within the DBS JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOANALYSIS, October 2015, p. 116-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.17145/jab.15.019 (ISSN 2405-710X) Vol. 1, No. 4
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血斑干燥时间对6种免疫抑制剂回收率的影响
DBS取样的主要优点之一是患者可以在家中取样,并将DBS样本邮寄到实验室[1-4]。这种采样被认为是对患者友好的,因为它侵入性较小,节省了患者的运输成本和时间。DBS采样也具有较低的生物危害风险,并且比静脉采样所需的血量更少[2,4]。实体器官移植受者需要终生使用免疫抑制药物,如他克莫司(TaC)、西罗莫司(SiR)、依维莫司(EvE)和环孢素a (CyA),以防止同种异体移植排斥反应。这些药物的生物分析和治疗药物监测是必要的,因为疗效和毒性与血药浓度和/或药代动力学参数有关。因此,这些患者可以从免疫抑制剂DBS分析中获益。自从将干血斑(DBS)分析用于治疗药物监测(TDM)以来,为了提高分析结果的质量,已经提出了更广泛的验证程序。红细胞压积值、斑点体积和DBS稳定性的变化是方法验证过程中应该研究的参数[1,5]。一个可能未被重视的可变性来源可能是干燥的血斑样本的干燥时间。DBS卡片上的血液采集后应在常温下干燥。欧洲生物分析论坛(EBF)已经提出,所需的干燥时间可能会受到红细胞压积(HT)的影响,这可能会影响检测的稳稳性和可重复性[5]。因此,建议将这些参数作为验证的一部分进行研究[5]。虽然DBS在3小时后可能会出现干燥,但DBS中物质的提取回收率,应用生物分析杂志,2015年10月,第116-122页。http://dx.doi.org/10.17145/jab.15.019 (ISSN 2405-710X)第一卷,第4期
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Box-Behnken Design (BBD) Based Optimization of Mucoadhesive Tablet Loaded Nifedipine: In-vitro Release and Stability Studies Challenges in Development and Qualification of PCR/dPCR Assays for Gene Therapy Biodistribution and Viral Shedding Assessment Current Challenges and Opportunities in using the LAL Assay for Endotoxin Testing Pharmacokinetic Profile of Metformin and SGLT2 Inhibitors alone and in Combination: a Pharmacokinetic Study in Wistar Rats Survey on Microsampling in Bioanalysis: Opportunities and Challenges-Results and Conclusions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1