The Relationship Between the Time of Start of Isolation at Facilities and Prevention of Household Transmission in COVID-19 Patients

Kazushi Funayama
{"title":"The Relationship Between the Time of Start of Isolation at Facilities and Prevention of Household Transmission in COVID-19 Patients","authors":"Kazushi Funayama","doi":"10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi.95.391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Japanese government recommends isolation at dedicated facilities for prevention of household transmission of COVID-19, however, the relation between the time of start of isolation at facilities and the household secondary attack incidence rate is still unknown. Since COVID-19 is contagious from 2 days prior to symptom onset and the viral load is the maximal just after the onset of symptoms, we thought that household infection could have already occurred even if the patient is isolated at a facility soon after the diagnosis. Therefore, we examined the relationship between the period from 2 days before symptom onset and the start of isolation at a facility (the infection exposure period) and the household secondary attack incidence rate among 1,075 index cases in households who were under isolation at facilities. We defined transmissions in households as cases in which household secondary transmission occurred to more than one person, and the household secondary attack incidence rate as the value obtained by dividing the number of households in which secondary transmission occurred by the total number of households. Evaluation of the household secondary attack incidence rate for each infection exposure period revealed that household secondary transmission did not occur in cases with an infection exposure period of 3 days, and the household secondary incidence rate was 22.6% (95% CI, 16.9%-29.5%) for an infection exposure period of 7 days, and 45.5% (95% CI, 21.3%-72.0%) for infection exposure periods of 12 days or more (regression analysis: y=0.037x-0.047;R2=0.863;p < 0.01). These findings suggest that the household secondary attack incidence rate increased as the infection exposure period increased, and that the household secondary attack incidence rate could be reduced to half (from 45.5% for an infection exposure period of 12 days to 22.6% for a period of 7 days) if we could start isolation so as to keep the infection exposure period at 7 days or less (5 days or less after the onset).","PeriodicalId":17713,"journal":{"name":"Kansenshogaku Zasshi","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansenshogaku Zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi.95.391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Japanese government recommends isolation at dedicated facilities for prevention of household transmission of COVID-19, however, the relation between the time of start of isolation at facilities and the household secondary attack incidence rate is still unknown. Since COVID-19 is contagious from 2 days prior to symptom onset and the viral load is the maximal just after the onset of symptoms, we thought that household infection could have already occurred even if the patient is isolated at a facility soon after the diagnosis. Therefore, we examined the relationship between the period from 2 days before symptom onset and the start of isolation at a facility (the infection exposure period) and the household secondary attack incidence rate among 1,075 index cases in households who were under isolation at facilities. We defined transmissions in households as cases in which household secondary transmission occurred to more than one person, and the household secondary attack incidence rate as the value obtained by dividing the number of households in which secondary transmission occurred by the total number of households. Evaluation of the household secondary attack incidence rate for each infection exposure period revealed that household secondary transmission did not occur in cases with an infection exposure period of 3 days, and the household secondary incidence rate was 22.6% (95% CI, 16.9%-29.5%) for an infection exposure period of 7 days, and 45.5% (95% CI, 21.3%-72.0%) for infection exposure periods of 12 days or more (regression analysis: y=0.037x-0.047;R2=0.863;p < 0.01). These findings suggest that the household secondary attack incidence rate increased as the infection exposure period increased, and that the household secondary attack incidence rate could be reduced to half (from 45.5% for an infection exposure period of 12 days to 22.6% for a period of 7 days) if we could start isolation so as to keep the infection exposure period at 7 days or less (5 days or less after the onset).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设施隔离开始时间与COVID-19患者家庭传播预防的关系
日本政府为防止新冠病毒在家庭中传播,建议在专用设施进行隔离,但目前还不清楚隔离开始时间与家庭二次发病发生率之间的关系。由于COVID-19在症状出现前2天就具有传染性,并且在症状出现后病毒载量最大,因此我们认为,即使患者在诊断后不久就被隔离在设施中,家庭感染也可能已经发生。因此,我们研究了症状出现前2天到开始在设施隔离的时间(感染暴露期)与在设施隔离的家庭中1075例指标病例的家庭二次发作发病率之间的关系。我们将家庭中的传播定义为不止一人发生家庭二次传播的病例,并将家庭二次攻击发生率定义为发生二次传播的家庭数除以家庭总数所得到的值。对每个感染暴露期的家庭继发发病率进行评估发现,感染暴露期为3天的病例未发生家庭继发传播,感染暴露期为7天的家庭继发发病率为22.6% (95% CI, 16.9% ~ 29.5%),感染暴露期为12天及以上的家庭继发发病率为45.5% (95% CI, 21.3% ~ 72.0%)(回归分析:y=0.037x-0.047;R2=0.863;p < 0.01)。上述结果提示,随着感染暴露期的延长,家庭二次发病的发病率呈上升趋势,如果采取隔离措施,使感染暴露期不超过7天(发病后不超过5天),家庭二次发病的发病率可降至一半(暴露期为12天的45.5%降至7天的22.6%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MRSA感染症の診療ガイドライン2024 Clostridioides difficile感染症診療ガイドライン2022 A Case of Streptococcus iniae Bacteremia Misdiagnosed by Biochemical Testing, but Diagnosed Definitively by Mass Spectrometry and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Analyses of the Relationship Between the Results of Virus Isolation and Rapid Antigen Detection Tests of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Test-Positive Specimens HIV-1感染急性期の症例に対するGeenius HIV-1/2 Confirmatory Assayによる判定結果と考察
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1