Awareness of the non-contraceptive benefits of reversible contraceptive methods in a cohort of Brazilian women: an exploratory study

L. Bahamondes, María Y. Makuch
{"title":"Awareness of the non-contraceptive benefits of reversible contraceptive methods in a cohort of Brazilian women: an exploratory study","authors":"L. Bahamondes, María Y. Makuch","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2022.2054983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose We assess the awareness of Brazilian women about non-contraceptive benefits of contraceptives and compare non-health with health care providers. Material and methods We conducted a survey in Brazil using a questionnaire administered via Google Forms asking women to respond about the awareness of non-contraceptive benefits of combined oral contraceptives (COCs), depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), etonogestrel (ENG)-implant, copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD), and male condom. Results We received 2,068 completed questionnaires, 720 women (34.8%) aged ≤ 29 years and 236 (11.4%) were physicians or nurses. Only one third of the respondents were aware that COC use is associated with decreased risks of ovarian and endometrial cancers; 296 (16.1%) about that the use of DMPA is associated with a decreased risk of endometrial cancer, and 253 (13.8%) were aware about that the users of the Cu-IUD present lower risk of cervical cancer. We identified significant differences between non-health care providers when compared to physicians or nurses. Conclusions We found low awareness regarding the associated lower risk of ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer associated with the use of some contraceptives, evidencing the need to provide more information about the non-contraceptive benefits during training for health care providers.","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"142 1","pages":"294 - 299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2022.2054983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Purpose We assess the awareness of Brazilian women about non-contraceptive benefits of contraceptives and compare non-health with health care providers. Material and methods We conducted a survey in Brazil using a questionnaire administered via Google Forms asking women to respond about the awareness of non-contraceptive benefits of combined oral contraceptives (COCs), depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), etonogestrel (ENG)-implant, copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD), and male condom. Results We received 2,068 completed questionnaires, 720 women (34.8%) aged ≤ 29 years and 236 (11.4%) were physicians or nurses. Only one third of the respondents were aware that COC use is associated with decreased risks of ovarian and endometrial cancers; 296 (16.1%) about that the use of DMPA is associated with a decreased risk of endometrial cancer, and 253 (13.8%) were aware about that the users of the Cu-IUD present lower risk of cervical cancer. We identified significant differences between non-health care providers when compared to physicians or nurses. Conclusions We found low awareness regarding the associated lower risk of ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancer associated with the use of some contraceptives, evidencing the need to provide more information about the non-contraceptive benefits during training for health care providers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可逆避孕方法在巴西妇女队列中的非避孕益处的认识:一项探索性研究
摘要目的我们评估巴西妇女对避孕药具的非避孕益处的认识,并比较非健康与卫生保健提供者。材料和方法我们在巴西进行了一项调查,通过谷歌表格进行问卷调查,询问妇女对联合口服避孕药(COCs)、醋酸甲孕酮(DMPA)、52 mg左炔诺孕酮释放宫内系统(LNG-IUS)、炔诺孕酮(ENG)植入物、铜宫内节育器(Cu-IUD)和男用避孕套的非避孕益处的认识。结果共收到完整问卷2068份,其中年龄≤29岁的女性720名(34.8%),内科或护士236名(11.4%)。只有三分之一的答复者意识到使用COC与卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌风险降低有关;296人(16.1%)知道使用DMPA与子宫内膜癌的风险降低有关,253人(13.8%)知道使用Cu-IUD的人患宫颈癌的风险较低。我们发现,与医生或护士相比,非卫生保健提供者之间存在显著差异。结论:我们发现人们对使用某些避孕药具与卵巢癌、子宫内膜癌和宫颈癌相关的风险较低的认识较低,这表明在对卫生保健提供者进行培训时,有必要提供更多关于非避孕药具益处的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain relief during intrauterine device placement in nulligravid women with both oral ketorolac and an analgesic: a double-blinded randomised trial Legal abortion requests and outcomes for women when the law is restrictive – experience from a referral centre in south-eastern Brazil ‘Do I want children later in life?’ Reproductive intentions of 1700 adolescents Oestrogens in oral contraception: considerations for tailoring prescription to women’s needs Prevalence of high-risk HPV and cervical dysplasia in IUD users and controls: a cross sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1