Questione di modelli : Petrarca, Gerolamo e lo Hieronymianus di Giovanni d'Andrea

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY AEVUM-RASSEGNA DI SCIENZE STORICHE LINGUISTICHE E FILOLOGICHE Pub Date : 2011-01-01 DOI:10.1400/210095
B. Clausi
{"title":"Questione di modelli : Petrarca, Gerolamo e lo Hieronymianus di Giovanni d'Andrea","authors":"B. Clausi","doi":"10.1400/210095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two Petrarch's letters (Familiares IV 15 and 16) are commonly taken into account for their autobiographical and apologetic aspects. The present article places them into the debate about the limits and characteristics of the academic knowledge (represented by the great jurist Giovanni d'Andrea) and its relationships with the new humanistic culture, with its myths and its models. Petrarch's discussion and comparison between St Jerome and St Augustine has to be considered in this context: the two Fathers stand for two well-defined and basically opposite ideas of culture. In its Hieronymianus (BHL 3876), a multipurpose work, which is not only a hagiography or a florilegium, Giovanni d'Andrea shapes an image of St Jerome's holiness and lays down methods and areas of its use for different purposes, from popular devotion to theology and to juridical culture. Attention is focused on the fourth section of the Hieronymianus, which has a particular importance in the textual history of Jerome's work.","PeriodicalId":55949,"journal":{"name":"AEVUM-RASSEGNA DI SCIENZE STORICHE LINGUISTICHE E FILOLOGICHE","volume":"41 1","pages":"527-566"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEVUM-RASSEGNA DI SCIENZE STORICHE LINGUISTICHE E FILOLOGICHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/210095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two Petrarch's letters (Familiares IV 15 and 16) are commonly taken into account for their autobiographical and apologetic aspects. The present article places them into the debate about the limits and characteristics of the academic knowledge (represented by the great jurist Giovanni d'Andrea) and its relationships with the new humanistic culture, with its myths and its models. Petrarch's discussion and comparison between St Jerome and St Augustine has to be considered in this context: the two Fathers stand for two well-defined and basically opposite ideas of culture. In its Hieronymianus (BHL 3876), a multipurpose work, which is not only a hagiography or a florilegium, Giovanni d'Andrea shapes an image of St Jerome's holiness and lays down methods and areas of its use for different purposes, from popular devotion to theology and to juridical culture. Attention is focused on the fourth section of the Hieronymianus, which has a particular importance in the textual history of Jerome's work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模型问题:Petrarca, Gerolamo和Giovanni d' andrea的Hieronymianus
彼特拉克的两封信(Familiares IV, 15和16)通常被认为是自传体和道歉的方面。本文将他们置于关于学术知识(以伟大的法学家乔瓦尼·德安德里亚为代表)的局限性和特征及其与新人文主义文化、其神话和模式的关系的辩论中。彼特拉克对圣杰罗姆和圣奥古斯丁的讨论和比较必须在这样的背景下考虑:两位父亲代表着两种定义明确且基本相反的文化观念。乔瓦尼·德安德里亚在其《圣像录》(BHL 3876)中,这是一部多用途的作品,不仅是圣徒传记或花谱,乔瓦尼·德安德里亚塑造了圣杰罗姆的神圣形象,并规定了其用于不同目的的方法和领域,从大众对神学和司法文化的热爱。注意力集中在Hieronymianus的第四部分,这在杰罗姆作品的文本历史中具有特别重要的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A survey of the manuscripts of Augustine's De Civitate Dei : new acquisitions El tercer hombre. Leócrates, Macedonia y el oscuro amintas The Athens of the North? Scotland and the national struggle for the Parthenon, its marbles, and its identity È esistita l’epidikasia arghias? Considerazioni intorno a Anecd. Graeca I 310, 1-5 Rediscovering Theopompos : Neglected Evidence of the Meropis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1