{"title":"Timing of Ansa Cervicalis-to-recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Reinnervation: A Systematic Review","authors":"Matthew Fadhil , Thomas Havas , Ian Jacobson","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><span>Ansa cervicalis-to-recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis (ARA) is an established technique for the treatment of </span>recurrent laryngeal nerve<span><span> (RLN) injury after head and neck surgery. However, the optimal timing of ARA remains unclear, and the evidence bases for ARA performed at each timepoint after RLN injury have not previously been clearly distinguished. We conducted a </span>systematic review of the literature to evaluate the efficacy of ARA performed at different timepoints on postoperative voice outcomes.</span></div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A review of English-language journal articles published in the last 20 years was undertaken on three electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase. Studies with a focus on paediatric<span> RLN injury, bilateral RLN injury, ansa cervicalis anatomy and non-ARA techniques alone were excluded.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty eight articles were included in the review. ARA was performed as a delayed surgery in 16/28 studies (57%), while immediate ARA was utilized in 14/28 studies (50%). On qualitative synthesis, delayed ARA was shown to be effective in improving patient-reported, subjective observer-reported and objective observer-reported voice outcomes. Likewise, a substantial body of evidence was identified demonstrating postoperative voice improvement with immediate ARA. On direct comparison of timepoints, some benefit was shown for early delayed ARA relative to late delayed operations, while no comparative data for immediate versus delayed repair were available in the literature.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ARA at both delayed and immediate timepoints is effective in the treatment of patients with RLN injury after head and neck surgery. The timing of ARA may have some influence on its efficacy, with early delayed repair potentially associated with superior outcomes to late delayed operations, and immediate ARA offering several practical advantages relative to delayed repair. Further comparative studies are required to better characterize the optimal timing of ARA after RLN injury.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":"38 6","pages":"Pages 1484-1497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089219972200114X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Ansa cervicalis-to-recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis (ARA) is an established technique for the treatment of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury after head and neck surgery. However, the optimal timing of ARA remains unclear, and the evidence bases for ARA performed at each timepoint after RLN injury have not previously been clearly distinguished. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the efficacy of ARA performed at different timepoints on postoperative voice outcomes.
Methods
A review of English-language journal articles published in the last 20 years was undertaken on three electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase. Studies with a focus on paediatric RLN injury, bilateral RLN injury, ansa cervicalis anatomy and non-ARA techniques alone were excluded.
Results
Twenty eight articles were included in the review. ARA was performed as a delayed surgery in 16/28 studies (57%), while immediate ARA was utilized in 14/28 studies (50%). On qualitative synthesis, delayed ARA was shown to be effective in improving patient-reported, subjective observer-reported and objective observer-reported voice outcomes. Likewise, a substantial body of evidence was identified demonstrating postoperative voice improvement with immediate ARA. On direct comparison of timepoints, some benefit was shown for early delayed ARA relative to late delayed operations, while no comparative data for immediate versus delayed repair were available in the literature.
Conclusions
ARA at both delayed and immediate timepoints is effective in the treatment of patients with RLN injury after head and neck surgery. The timing of ARA may have some influence on its efficacy, with early delayed repair potentially associated with superior outcomes to late delayed operations, and immediate ARA offering several practical advantages relative to delayed repair. Further comparative studies are required to better characterize the optimal timing of ARA after RLN injury.
背景:喉返神经吻合术(ARA)是治疗头颈部手术后喉返神经(RLN)损伤的一种成熟技术。然而,喉返神经吻合术的最佳时机仍不明确,在喉返神经损伤后的每个时间点进行喉返神经吻合术的证据基础以前也没有明确区分。我们对文献进行了系统性回顾,以评估在不同时间点进行 ARA 对术后嗓音效果的影响:我们在三个电子数据库中对过去 20 年中发表的英文期刊论文进行了综述:Ovid MEDLINE、PubMed 和 Embase。重点关注儿科RLN损伤、双侧RLN损伤、颈鞍解剖和非ARA技术的研究被排除在外:结果:共有 28 篇文章被纳入综述。有 16/28 篇研究(57%)采用延迟 ARA 手术,14/28 篇研究(50%)采用即时 ARA。根据定性综合分析,延迟 ARA 在改善患者报告、主观观察者报告和客观观察者报告的嗓音效果方面效果显著。同样,有大量证据表明,立即 ARA 可改善术后嗓音。在时间点的直接比较中,早期延迟 ARA 与晚期延迟手术相比有一定的优势,但文献中没有关于立即修复与延迟修复的比较数据:结论:对于头颈部手术后RLN损伤患者的治疗,延迟和立即两种时间点的ARA均有效。ARA的时机可能对其疗效有一定影响,早期延迟修复的疗效可能优于晚期延迟手术,而即刻ARA相对于延迟修复具有一些实际优势。要更好地确定 RLN 损伤后 ARA 的最佳时机,还需要进一步的比较研究。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.