Is 'WTO-Plus' a Policy Option for India-China Agriculture Trade? A CGE Analysis

Shahid Ahmed, Saba Ismail
{"title":"Is 'WTO-Plus' a Policy Option for India-China Agriculture Trade? A CGE Analysis","authors":"Shahid Ahmed, Saba Ismail","doi":"10.17015/ejbe.2020.026.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the effect of bilateral tariff reduction in the agriculture sector between India and China. The results are evaluated in terms of welfare, output, employment and the potential trade flows between India and China using the GTAPmodel. The present study suggests that partial tariff reduction on imports of agricultural commodities between India and China may be welfare-enhancing for both India and China while complete tariff reduction on imports of agricultural commodities may have welfare loss for India, though there will be substantial welfare gains for China. The study reveals that welfare gains for China are larger in comparison to India. The study suggests that a well calculated and strategically negotiated tariff reduction in the agriculture sector may create a win-win situation for both partners. The study further argues that China should offer preferential market access to India for mutually beneficial and welfare-enhancing engagements for both countries. Finally, the study concludes that there exists a narrow scope for 'WTO-Plus' approach for India-China agriculture trade relations. India should assess all pros and cons as it has revenue loss and impact on economically marginalised 'Farming Community'","PeriodicalId":30328,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17015/ejbe.2020.026.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of bilateral tariff reduction in the agriculture sector between India and China. The results are evaluated in terms of welfare, output, employment and the potential trade flows between India and China using the GTAPmodel. The present study suggests that partial tariff reduction on imports of agricultural commodities between India and China may be welfare-enhancing for both India and China while complete tariff reduction on imports of agricultural commodities may have welfare loss for India, though there will be substantial welfare gains for China. The study reveals that welfare gains for China are larger in comparison to India. The study suggests that a well calculated and strategically negotiated tariff reduction in the agriculture sector may create a win-win situation for both partners. The study further argues that China should offer preferential market access to India for mutually beneficial and welfare-enhancing engagements for both countries. Finally, the study concludes that there exists a narrow scope for 'WTO-Plus' approach for India-China agriculture trade relations. India should assess all pros and cons as it has revenue loss and impact on economically marginalised 'Farming Community'
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“wto +”是印中农业贸易的政策选择吗?CGE分析
本文考察了印度和中国农业部门双边关税削减的影响。使用gtap模型,从福利、产出、就业和印度与中国之间的潜在贸易流量等方面对结果进行了评估。目前的研究表明,印度和中国之间农产品进口关税的部分降低可能会增加印度和中国的福利,而农产品进口关税的完全降低可能会对印度造成福利损失,尽管中国将获得实质性的福利收益。研究显示,与印度相比,中国的福利收益更大。该研究表明,在农业部门进行精心计算和战略谈判的关税削减可能为双方创造双赢局面。该研究进一步认为,中国应该向印度提供优惠的市场准入,以实现两国互利共赢和增进福利的合作。最后,该研究得出结论,印中农业贸易关系的“wto +”方式存在狭窄的范围。印度应该评估所有的利弊,因为这会造成收入损失,并对经济边缘化的“农业社区”产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Relation of Glass Ceiling Beliefs and Subjective Career Success: Role of Social Support and Gender Behavioural Finance: A Review of Major Research Themes and Bibliometric Analysis Geopolitical Turmoil and G7 Renewable Electricity Production: Impacts of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict The Russia-Ukraine War’s Impact on Stock Markets in Asia-Pacific, the United States, and Europe Fostering Organizational Performance at Central and Eastern European Universities: The Impact of Knowledge Creation and Affective Commitment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1