{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Encryption Algorithms","authors":"A. Olutola, Matthew Olumuyiwa","doi":"10.47672/ejt.1312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Encryption algorithm allows users to extend the assurance found in the physical world to the electronic world in the carrying out of our day-to-day activities. This research attempts to make a comparative evaluation of two encryption algorithms (Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) and Rivest Shamir Algorithm (RSA) in order to ascertain the most reliable in terms of their encryption time, decryption time, Key length, and cipher length. \nMethodology: Java programming was used for the development and Mongo Db to generate data parsing. \nFindings: The results obtained from the development revealed that AES is considered more efficient because it uses lesser time for encryption and decryption, reduces cipher and key length as compared with RSA which consumes longer encryption and decryption time, and increases cipher and key length. Excel package was also used to display the pictorial representation of the comparison between these algorithms. \nRecommendation: Advanced encryption standard is recommended for security-based application developers because of the small time of encryption and decryption.","PeriodicalId":55090,"journal":{"name":"Glass Technology-European Journal of Glass Science and Technology Part a","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glass Technology-European Journal of Glass Science and Technology Part a","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ejt.1312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Purpose: Encryption algorithm allows users to extend the assurance found in the physical world to the electronic world in the carrying out of our day-to-day activities. This research attempts to make a comparative evaluation of two encryption algorithms (Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) and Rivest Shamir Algorithm (RSA) in order to ascertain the most reliable in terms of their encryption time, decryption time, Key length, and cipher length.
Methodology: Java programming was used for the development and Mongo Db to generate data parsing.
Findings: The results obtained from the development revealed that AES is considered more efficient because it uses lesser time for encryption and decryption, reduces cipher and key length as compared with RSA which consumes longer encryption and decryption time, and increases cipher and key length. Excel package was also used to display the pictorial representation of the comparison between these algorithms.
Recommendation: Advanced encryption standard is recommended for security-based application developers because of the small time of encryption and decryption.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Society of Glass Technology was published between 1917 and 1959. There were four or six issues per year depending on economic circumstances of the Society and the country. Each issue contains Proceedings, Transactions, Abstracts, News and Reviews, and Advertisements, all thesesections were numbered separately. The bound volumes collected these pages into separate sections, dropping the adverts. There is a list of Council members and Officers of the Society and earlier volumes also had lists of personal and company members.
JSGT was divided into Part A Glass Technology and Part B Physics and Chemistry of Glasses in 1960.