Comparison of In-Hospital Complications among Patients with Right Ventricular Infarction

A. Bhuiyan, K. Hasan, Partha Pratim Saha, Sayeda Sadia Fathema, Najmul Huda Biplob
{"title":"Comparison of In-Hospital Complications among Patients with Right Ventricular Infarction","authors":"A. Bhuiyan, K. Hasan, Partha Pratim Saha, Sayeda Sadia Fathema, Najmul Huda Biplob","doi":"10.3329/jninb.v8i2.63749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with right ventricular infarction is a critical condition and may cause adverse cardiac events. \nObjective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the in-hospital complications among patients with right ventricular infarction based on TIMI risk score. \nMethodology: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Dhaka, Bangladesh from May 2007 to April 2008 for a period of one year. All the patients who were admitted into the coronary care unit of NICVD with acute inferior myocardial infarction with or without anterior myocardial infarction were selected as study population. Inclusion Criteria were patients admitted in CCU (NICVD) with acute inferior myocardial infarction with right ventricular infarction. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the extent of TIMI risk score. Patients with low TIMI risk score (0 to 3) were included in Group I and patients with high TIMI risk-score (4 to 14) were include in group II. Patients were followed up in their hospital stay to see the incidence of major cardiac events. \nResults: A total number of 60 patients with right ventricular infarction of which 30 consecutive patients with low TIMI risk score (0 to 3) were in Group I and 30 consecutive patients with high TIMI risk score (4 to 14) were in Group II. In-hospital mortality was 18.3% in the study populations and it was significantly higher in group II (33.3%) than group (3.3%). The next most common complication is cardiogenic shock followed by complete heart block, Cardiac arrest, VT and 2nd degree heart block. \nConclusion: In conclusion the in-hospital mortality in the study populations is significantly higher in group II than group I \nJournal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh, July 2022;8(2):143-146","PeriodicalId":16732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jninb.v8i2.63749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with right ventricular infarction is a critical condition and may cause adverse cardiac events. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to compare the in-hospital complications among patients with right ventricular infarction based on TIMI risk score. Methodology: This prospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Cardiology, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (NICVD), Dhaka, Bangladesh from May 2007 to April 2008 for a period of one year. All the patients who were admitted into the coronary care unit of NICVD with acute inferior myocardial infarction with or without anterior myocardial infarction were selected as study population. Inclusion Criteria were patients admitted in CCU (NICVD) with acute inferior myocardial infarction with right ventricular infarction. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the extent of TIMI risk score. Patients with low TIMI risk score (0 to 3) were included in Group I and patients with high TIMI risk-score (4 to 14) were include in group II. Patients were followed up in their hospital stay to see the incidence of major cardiac events. Results: A total number of 60 patients with right ventricular infarction of which 30 consecutive patients with low TIMI risk score (0 to 3) were in Group I and 30 consecutive patients with high TIMI risk score (4 to 14) were in Group II. In-hospital mortality was 18.3% in the study populations and it was significantly higher in group II (33.3%) than group (3.3%). The next most common complication is cardiogenic shock followed by complete heart block, Cardiac arrest, VT and 2nd degree heart block. Conclusion: In conclusion the in-hospital mortality in the study populations is significantly higher in group II than group I Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh, July 2022;8(2):143-146
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
右室梗死患者住院并发症的比较
背景:右室梗死是一种危重疾病,可能引起不良的心脏事件。目的:比较TIMI风险评分对右室梗死患者住院并发症的影响。方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究于2007年5月至2008年4月在孟加拉国达卡国家心血管疾病研究所(NICVD)心内科进行,为期一年。选择所有NICVD合并急性下壁心肌梗死合并或不合并前壁心肌梗死的冠状动脉监护室收治的患者作为研究人群。纳入标准为CCU (NICVD)急性下壁心肌梗死合并右室梗死患者。根据TIMI风险评分的程度将患者分为两组。TIMI风险评分低(0 ~ 3分)的患者为I组,TIMI风险评分高(4 ~ 14分)的患者为II组。在住院期间对患者进行随访,以了解主要心脏事件的发生率。结果:共60例右室梗死患者,其中TIMI低危评分连续30例(0 ~ 3)为I组,TIMI高危评分连续30例(4 ~ 14)为II组。研究人群的住院死亡率为18.3%,II组(33.3%)明显高于组(3.3%)。其次最常见的并发症是心源性休克,其次是完全性心脏传导阻滞、心脏骤停、室速和二度心脏传导阻滞。结论:综上所述,研究人群中II组的住院死亡率明显高于I组。孟加拉国国家神经科学研究所杂志,2022年7月;8(2):143-146
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Behavior of Non-Hybrid and Hybrid Forms of Fibro-Osseous Lesions in the Cranio-Maxillofacial Region of Patients Attending at the Tertiary Care Hospital in Dhaka City of Bangladesh Association of Ischaemic Heart Disease with Hospitalized Ischaemic Stroke Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital Trend of Patients Attended at Emergency Department of Referral Neurosciences Hospital in Bangladesh Rare Association between Congenital Dorsal Dermal Sinus with Tethered Cord Syndrome: A Case Report Subclavian Steal Syndrome Presented with Recurrent Syncope: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1