Why do good deeds go unnoticed? A perspective on the legitimacy Judgment of social entrepreneurship in China

IF 3.3 1区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS Entrepreneurship and Regional Development Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.1080/08985626.2022.2071995
Wenzhi Zheng, Yichao Chen, Yu-Xiao Dai, Y. Wu, Mengting Hu
{"title":"Why do good deeds go unnoticed? A perspective on the legitimacy Judgment of social entrepreneurship in China","authors":"Wenzhi Zheng, Yichao Chen, Yu-Xiao Dai, Y. Wu, Mengting Hu","doi":"10.1080/08985626.2022.2071995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The support of entrepreneurial partners is key to social entrepreneurship and the continuous creation of social value. However, social entrepreneurship in China does not receive sufficient support from venture partners, contrary to the moral spirit of benevolence advocated by traditional Chinese Confucianism. From the perspective of the legitimacy judgement of entrepreneurial partners and using information processing theory, we construct a theoretical model of the interaction between uncertainty and entrepreneurial passion in entrepreneurial engagement and test hypotheses with data from 325 questionnaires completed in China. The results show that uncertainty negatively affects social entrepreneurial engagement, entrepreneurial passion positively affects social entrepreneurial engagement, and legitimacy judgement plays a mediating role in the relationship among uncertainty, entrepreneurial passion, and entrepreneurial engagement. The interaction between uncertainty and entrepreneurial passion affects entrepreneurial engagement through pragmatic legitimacy judgements and moral legitimacy judgements but not through relational legitimacy judgements. We examine why it is difficult for meritorious Chinese social entrepreneurial activities to obtain sufficient support from the perspective of entrepreneurial partners’ judgements, extending the legitimacy judgement theory of social entrepreneurship from the perspective of interaction between individuals and the context.","PeriodicalId":54210,"journal":{"name":"Entrepreneurship and Regional Development","volume":"31 1","pages":"788 - 806"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entrepreneurship and Regional Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.2071995","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT The support of entrepreneurial partners is key to social entrepreneurship and the continuous creation of social value. However, social entrepreneurship in China does not receive sufficient support from venture partners, contrary to the moral spirit of benevolence advocated by traditional Chinese Confucianism. From the perspective of the legitimacy judgement of entrepreneurial partners and using information processing theory, we construct a theoretical model of the interaction between uncertainty and entrepreneurial passion in entrepreneurial engagement and test hypotheses with data from 325 questionnaires completed in China. The results show that uncertainty negatively affects social entrepreneurial engagement, entrepreneurial passion positively affects social entrepreneurial engagement, and legitimacy judgement plays a mediating role in the relationship among uncertainty, entrepreneurial passion, and entrepreneurial engagement. The interaction between uncertainty and entrepreneurial passion affects entrepreneurial engagement through pragmatic legitimacy judgements and moral legitimacy judgements but not through relational legitimacy judgements. We examine why it is difficult for meritorious Chinese social entrepreneurial activities to obtain sufficient support from the perspective of entrepreneurial partners’ judgements, extending the legitimacy judgement theory of social entrepreneurship from the perspective of interaction between individuals and the context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么善行不被人注意?中国社会创业合法性判断的视角
创业伙伴的支持是社会创业和持续创造社会价值的关键。然而,中国的社会创业并没有得到足够的创业伙伴的支持,这与中国传统儒家思想所倡导的仁爱的道德精神背道而驰。本文从创业伙伴合法性判断的角度出发,运用信息加工理论,构建了创业投入中不确定性与创业激情交互作用的理论模型,并利用325份中国问卷的数据对假设进行了检验。结果表明,不确定性负向影响社会创业投入,创业激情正向影响社会创业投入,合法性判断在不确定性、创业激情和创业投入之间的关系中起中介作用。不确定性与创业激情的交互作用通过实用合法性判断和道德合法性判断影响创业投入,但不通过关系合法性判断影响创业投入。我们从创业伙伴判断的角度考察中国社会创业行为难以获得足够支持的原因,从个体与情境互动的角度拓展社会创业合法性判断理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Entrepreneurship and Regional Development is unique in that it addresses the central factors in economic development - entrepreneurial vitality and innovation - as local and regional phenomena. It provides a multi-disciplinary forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of entrepreneurship and small firm development and for those studying and developing the local and regional context in which entrepreneurs emerge, innovate and establish the new economic activities which drive economic growth and create new economic wealth and employment. The Journal focuses on the diverse and complex characteristics of local and regional economies which lead to entrepreneurial vitality and endow the large and small firms within them with international competitiveness.
期刊最新文献
Back to work? How employers perceive applicants’ experience of entrepreneurial failure Exploring the impact of regional characteristics on social incubators’ mission, structure and activity: a contingency perspective Resilience and digitally-advanced entrepreneurship An Entrepreneurship-as-practice perspective of next-generation becoming family businesses successors: the role of discursive artefacts How small firms build resilience to ward off crises: a paradox perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1