Comparative Analysis of the Economic Structure of the Socialist Market Economy of China and the New Economy Policy

IF 0.4 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE International Critical Thought Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/21598282.2021.2007502
Maxence Poulin
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of the Economic Structure of the Socialist Market Economy of China and the New Economy Policy","authors":"Maxence Poulin","doi":"10.1080/21598282.2021.2007502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article presents an analysis of the Chinese mode of production since the 1978 economic reforms. We try to explain the Chinese economic reforms based on its Marxist-Leninist ideology. Our research takes the form of a comparative analysis of the economic structures of the Soviet NEP (New Economic Policy) and Chinese reforms using a Marxist theoretical framework. Does the Chinese economic model correspond to the same kind of socialism found in the USSR during the NEP period? Our thesis is that the modern Chinese mode of production, since 1990s, follows a logic similar to the Soviet one during the NEP era. In the light of the NEP experience, our research shows that the Chinese development strategy shouldn't be understood as trending towards a neoliberal model. It is rather an original evolution of Marxism, in line with the tradition of Marxism-Leninism, adapted to the cohabitation with a globalized capitalist system. The NEP model is one of the earliest examples of a type of socialism based in part on market relations. In the USSR, as in China, the critical structures of the economy, heavy regulations and a certain level of economic planning are the basis of this socialist market model.","PeriodicalId":43179,"journal":{"name":"International Critical Thought","volume":"28 1","pages":"519 - 534"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Critical Thought","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2021.2007502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article presents an analysis of the Chinese mode of production since the 1978 economic reforms. We try to explain the Chinese economic reforms based on its Marxist-Leninist ideology. Our research takes the form of a comparative analysis of the economic structures of the Soviet NEP (New Economic Policy) and Chinese reforms using a Marxist theoretical framework. Does the Chinese economic model correspond to the same kind of socialism found in the USSR during the NEP period? Our thesis is that the modern Chinese mode of production, since 1990s, follows a logic similar to the Soviet one during the NEP era. In the light of the NEP experience, our research shows that the Chinese development strategy shouldn't be understood as trending towards a neoliberal model. It is rather an original evolution of Marxism, in line with the tradition of Marxism-Leninism, adapted to the cohabitation with a globalized capitalist system. The NEP model is one of the earliest examples of a type of socialism based in part on market relations. In the USSR, as in China, the critical structures of the economy, heavy regulations and a certain level of economic planning are the basis of this socialist market model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国社会主义市场经济经济结构与新经济政策的比较分析
本文分析了1978年经济改革以来中国的生产方式。我们试图从马列主义的意识形态来解释中国的经济改革。我们的研究采用马克思主义理论框架对苏联新经济政策和中国改革的经济结构进行比较分析的形式。中国的经济模式是否与苏联在新经济政策时期的社会主义相对应?我们的论点是,自20世纪90年代以来,现代中国的生产方式遵循着与新经济政策时代的苏联相似的逻辑。根据新经济政策的经验,我们的研究表明,中国的发展战略不应该被理解为趋向于新自由主义模式。它是马克思主义的原创性演变,符合马克思列宁主义的传统,适应与全球化的资本主义制度共存。新经济政策模式是部分建立在市场关系基础上的社会主义最早的例子之一。在苏联,就像在中国一样,经济的关键结构、严格的监管和一定程度的经济计划是这种社会主义市场模式的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Critical Thought
International Critical Thought POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
The Colors of Content Moderation: A Portfolio of Brazilian Resistances to Coloniality on Instagram The Origin, Current Situation and Trends of Racism in the West The Law of Uneven Development and the Transition to a New World System: On the Spatial Political Economy of Socialism From “Authentic” to Actual Marxist Educational Theory: Advancing Revolutionary Pedagogies Medicine, Dissent and the “Chloroquinization” of Truth: Brazil and Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1