Impact of Cooking Conditions on Proximate Composition and Textural Properties of Chicken Breast Meat

S. U. Alugwu, T. Okonkwo, M. Ngadi
{"title":"Impact of Cooking Conditions on Proximate Composition and Textural Properties of Chicken Breast Meat","authors":"S. U. Alugwu, T. Okonkwo, M. Ngadi","doi":"10.9734/ejnfs/2023/v15i61313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cooking conditions on the proximate composition and textural properties (cohesiveness and chewiness) of chicken breast meat.  Eight packs of industrial skinless chicken breast meat were cooked by air frying (AF), baking (BK), deep fat frying (DF) and grilling (GR) at 170, 180 and 190oC for 0, 4, 8, 12 and 16 min. The chicken breast packs were frozen and sliced into dimensions, thawed, cooked and analysed by a two way analysis of variance. The results revealed that cooking methods significantly (p < 0.05) decreased moisture and protein contents from 75.14 to 58.25% and 89.17 to 82.98%, but increased fat content from 4.26 to 7.78%, ash content from 1.95 to 2.39%, carbohydrate content from 4.63 to 6.95%, cohesiveness content from 0.40 to 0.52 and chewiness value from 3.63 to 6.05 kg. An increases in cooking temperatures and times decreased  moisture  content  from  60.58 to % 56.34% and 75.14 to 47.40% and protein content from 83.77 to 82.11% and 89.17 to 79.45%. Similarly, increases in cooking temperatures and times significantly (p < 0.05) increased fat content from 7.00 to 8.44% and 4.26 to 10.12%, ash content from 2.15% to 2.59% and 1.95 to 2.67%. This study showed that increases in cooking temperatures decreased non-significantly (p > 0.05) carbohydrate content from 7.02 to 6.92%, but increases in cooking times increased carbohydrate content from 4.63 to 7.76%. An increases in cooking temperatures and times increased cohesiveness content from 0.50 to 0.54 and 0.40 to 0.63, chewiness value from 5.50 to 6.77 kg and 3.63 to 8.54 kg, respectively. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in chewiness values of samples cooked by AF and GR methods. The best cooking method/ temperature / time for low nutrient losses was BK, 170oC and 4 min.","PeriodicalId":11922,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition &amp; Food Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition &amp; Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2023/v15i61313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cooking conditions on the proximate composition and textural properties (cohesiveness and chewiness) of chicken breast meat.  Eight packs of industrial skinless chicken breast meat were cooked by air frying (AF), baking (BK), deep fat frying (DF) and grilling (GR) at 170, 180 and 190oC for 0, 4, 8, 12 and 16 min. The chicken breast packs were frozen and sliced into dimensions, thawed, cooked and analysed by a two way analysis of variance. The results revealed that cooking methods significantly (p < 0.05) decreased moisture and protein contents from 75.14 to 58.25% and 89.17 to 82.98%, but increased fat content from 4.26 to 7.78%, ash content from 1.95 to 2.39%, carbohydrate content from 4.63 to 6.95%, cohesiveness content from 0.40 to 0.52 and chewiness value from 3.63 to 6.05 kg. An increases in cooking temperatures and times decreased  moisture  content  from  60.58 to % 56.34% and 75.14 to 47.40% and protein content from 83.77 to 82.11% and 89.17 to 79.45%. Similarly, increases in cooking temperatures and times significantly (p < 0.05) increased fat content from 7.00 to 8.44% and 4.26 to 10.12%, ash content from 2.15% to 2.59% and 1.95 to 2.67%. This study showed that increases in cooking temperatures decreased non-significantly (p > 0.05) carbohydrate content from 7.02 to 6.92%, but increases in cooking times increased carbohydrate content from 4.63 to 7.76%. An increases in cooking temperatures and times increased cohesiveness content from 0.50 to 0.54 and 0.40 to 0.63, chewiness value from 5.50 to 6.77 kg and 3.63 to 8.54 kg, respectively. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in chewiness values of samples cooked by AF and GR methods. The best cooking method/ temperature / time for low nutrient losses was BK, 170oC and 4 min.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烹调条件对鸡胸肉近似成分和质地特性的影响
本研究的目的是评估烹饪条件对鸡胸肉的近似组成和质地特性(粘性和咀嚼性)的影响。8包工业去皮鸡胸肉分别采用空气煎炸(AF)、烘烤(BK)、深煎炸(DF)和烧烤(GR)方法,分别在170、180和190℃下煎0、4、8、12和16分钟。将鸡胸肉包冷冻、切片、解冻、煮熟,并通过双向方差分析进行分析。结果表明,蒸煮方式显著(p < 0.05)降低了籽粒水分和蛋白质含量,分别从75.14%降低到58.25%和89.17%降低到82.98%,但使籽粒脂肪含量从4.26%提高到7.78%,灰分含量从1.95提高到2.39%,碳水化合物含量从4.63提高到6.95%,黏结性从0.40提高到0.52,耐嚼性从3.63提高到6.05 kg。随着蒸煮温度和次数的增加,水分含量从60.58%降至56.34%和75.14%降至47.40%,蛋白质含量从83.77降至82.11%和89.17降至79.45%。同样,随着蒸煮温度和次数的增加,脂肪含量分别从7.00提高到8.44%和4.26提高到10.12%,灰分含量分别从2.15%提高到2.59%和1.95提高到2.67% (p < 0.05)。结果表明,随着蒸煮温度的升高,碳水化合物含量从7.02降低至6.92%,但蒸煮次数的增加,碳水化合物含量从4.63提高至7.76%,差异不显著(p > 0.05)。随着蒸煮温度和次数的增加,胶黏性含量分别从0.50提高到0.54和0.40提高到0.63,耐嚼性分别从5.50提高到6.77和3.63提高到8.54 kg。AF法和GR法烹煮样品的嚼劲值无显著差异(p > 0.05)。低营养损失的最佳蒸煮方法/温度/时间为BK、170℃、4 min。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Probiotic Attributes of Isolated Yeast Strains from Fruits and Bread Awareness about Nutritional Benefits of Millets among Young Adults of Ayodhya District, India Optimizing Process Conditions for Ghewar Development Using Response Surface Methodology Qualitative Assessment of Flours from Five Varieties of Yam in Benue State Nigeria Awareness about Government Scheme of Maternal Nutrition among Urban Area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1