Student Progress in Learning Computer Programming: Insights from Association Analysis

Candido Cabo
{"title":"Student Progress in Learning Computer Programming: Insights from Association Analysis","authors":"Candido Cabo","doi":"10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this research to practice full paper we quantified progress in the ability of first-year students (n=54) to solve problems using computer programming control structures with different levels of complexity like sequencing, selection (if/else) and repetition (for/while). Students used both a flowchart interpreter and Python to write programs. We found that 70% of students could solve problems involving a sequence of statements (i.e. without the use of selection or repetition) using a flowchart interpreter or Python. The majority of the students who could not solve sequencing problems were not successful at solving problems involving selection and repetition (69% using flowcharts and 94% using Python). On the other hand, of the students who could solve sequencing problems 45% (flowchart) and 71% (Python) were able to solve problems involving selection and repetition. Therefore, the ability to solve problems involving a sequence of statements is a good early predictor of success/failure in solving problems with more complicated control structures like selection and repetition. Success in solving computer programming problems depends on the tool used for $\\sim37$% of students. Therefore, the ability of students to transfer problem solving abilities between tools (from flowcharting to Python) is not automatic.","PeriodicalId":6700,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In this research to practice full paper we quantified progress in the ability of first-year students (n=54) to solve problems using computer programming control structures with different levels of complexity like sequencing, selection (if/else) and repetition (for/while). Students used both a flowchart interpreter and Python to write programs. We found that 70% of students could solve problems involving a sequence of statements (i.e. without the use of selection or repetition) using a flowchart interpreter or Python. The majority of the students who could not solve sequencing problems were not successful at solving problems involving selection and repetition (69% using flowcharts and 94% using Python). On the other hand, of the students who could solve sequencing problems 45% (flowchart) and 71% (Python) were able to solve problems involving selection and repetition. Therefore, the ability to solve problems involving a sequence of statements is a good early predictor of success/failure in solving problems with more complicated control structures like selection and repetition. Success in solving computer programming problems depends on the tool used for $\sim37$% of students. Therefore, the ability of students to transfer problem solving abilities between tools (from flowcharting to Python) is not automatic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生学习计算机程序设计的进展:来自关联分析的见解
在这项实践全文的研究中,我们量化了一年级学生(n=54)使用不同复杂程度的计算机编程控制结构(如排序、选择(if/else)和重复(for/while))解决问题的能力进展。学生们使用流程图解释器和Python编写程序。我们发现70%的学生可以使用流程图解释器或Python解决涉及一系列语句的问题(即不使用选择或重复)。大多数不能解决排序问题的学生不能成功地解决涉及选择和重复的问题(69%使用流程图,94%使用Python)。另一方面,能够解决排序问题的学生中,45%(流程图)和71% (Python)能够解决涉及选择和重复的问题。因此,解决包含一系列语句的问题的能力是解决具有更复杂控制结构(如选择和重复)的问题的成功/失败的良好早期预测指标。成功地解决计算机编程问题取决于学生所使用的工具。因此,学生在不同工具(从流程图到Python)之间转移问题解决能力的能力不是自动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learning professional software development skills by contributing to Open Source projects Development of a teaching plan to support learning activities of exploratory test design and execution Practical Strategies to Mentor around Hidden Curriculum Pathways in Engineering Impact on Second Language Writing via an Intelligent Writing Assistant and Metacognitive Training CURUMIM: A Proposal of an Intelligent Tutor System to Teach Trigonometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1