Deep Similarity Learning for Well Test Model Identification

G. Nagaraj, Prashanth Pillai, Mandar Kulkarni
{"title":"Deep Similarity Learning for Well Test Model Identification","authors":"G. Nagaraj, Prashanth Pillai, Mandar Kulkarni","doi":"10.2118/204675-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Over the years, well test analysis or pressure transient analysis (PTA) methods have progressed from straight lines via type curve analysis to pressure derivatives and deconvolution methods. Today, analysis of the log-log (pressure and its derivative) response is the most used method for PTA. Although these methods are widely available through commercial software, they are not fully automated, and human interaction is needed for their application. Furthermore, PTA is described as an inverse problem, whose solution in general is non-unique, and several models (well, reservoir and boundary) can be found applicable to similar pressure-derivative response. This tends to always bring about confusion in choosing the correct model using the conventional approach. This results in multiple iterations that are time consuming and requires constant human interaction.\n Our approach automates the process of PTA using a Siamese neural network (SNN) architecture comprised of Convolutional neural network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) layers. The SNN model is trained on simulated experimental data created using a design of experiments (DOE) approach involving most common 14 interpretation scenarios across well, reservoir, and boundary model types. Across each model type, parameters such as permeability, horizontal well length, skin factor, and distance to the boundary were sampled to compute 560 different pressure derivative responses. SNN is trained using a self-supervised training strategy where the positive and negative pairs are generated from the training data. We use transformations such as compression and expansion to generate positive pairs and negative pairs for the well test model responses.\n For a given well test model response, similarity scores are computed against the candidates in each model class, and the best match from each class is identified. These matches are then ranked according to the similarity scores to identify optimal candidates.\n Experimental analysis indicated that the true model class frequently appeared among the top ranked classes. The model achieves an accuracy of 93% for the top one model recommendations when tested on 70 samples from the 14 interpretation scenarios. Prior information on the top ranked probable well test models, significantly reduces the manual effort involved in the analysis.\n This machine learning (ML) approach can be integrated with any PTA software or function as a standalone application in the interpreter's system. Current work using SNN with LSTM layers can be used to speed up the process of detecting the pressure derivative response explained by a certain combination of well, reservoir and boundary models and produce models with less user interaction.\n This methodology will facilitate the interpretation engineer in making the model recognition faster for detailed integration with additional information from sources such as geophysics, geology, petrophysics, drilling, and production logging.","PeriodicalId":11094,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Mon, November 29, 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Mon, November 29, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/204675-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the years, well test analysis or pressure transient analysis (PTA) methods have progressed from straight lines via type curve analysis to pressure derivatives and deconvolution methods. Today, analysis of the log-log (pressure and its derivative) response is the most used method for PTA. Although these methods are widely available through commercial software, they are not fully automated, and human interaction is needed for their application. Furthermore, PTA is described as an inverse problem, whose solution in general is non-unique, and several models (well, reservoir and boundary) can be found applicable to similar pressure-derivative response. This tends to always bring about confusion in choosing the correct model using the conventional approach. This results in multiple iterations that are time consuming and requires constant human interaction. Our approach automates the process of PTA using a Siamese neural network (SNN) architecture comprised of Convolutional neural network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) layers. The SNN model is trained on simulated experimental data created using a design of experiments (DOE) approach involving most common 14 interpretation scenarios across well, reservoir, and boundary model types. Across each model type, parameters such as permeability, horizontal well length, skin factor, and distance to the boundary were sampled to compute 560 different pressure derivative responses. SNN is trained using a self-supervised training strategy where the positive and negative pairs are generated from the training data. We use transformations such as compression and expansion to generate positive pairs and negative pairs for the well test model responses. For a given well test model response, similarity scores are computed against the candidates in each model class, and the best match from each class is identified. These matches are then ranked according to the similarity scores to identify optimal candidates. Experimental analysis indicated that the true model class frequently appeared among the top ranked classes. The model achieves an accuracy of 93% for the top one model recommendations when tested on 70 samples from the 14 interpretation scenarios. Prior information on the top ranked probable well test models, significantly reduces the manual effort involved in the analysis. This machine learning (ML) approach can be integrated with any PTA software or function as a standalone application in the interpreter's system. Current work using SNN with LSTM layers can be used to speed up the process of detecting the pressure derivative response explained by a certain combination of well, reservoir and boundary models and produce models with less user interaction. This methodology will facilitate the interpretation engineer in making the model recognition faster for detailed integration with additional information from sources such as geophysics, geology, petrophysics, drilling, and production logging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深度相似学习在试井模型识别中的应用
多年来,试井分析或压力瞬态分析(PTA)方法已经从通过类型曲线分析的直线发展到压力导数和反褶积方法。目前,分析对数-对数(压力及其导数)响应是PTA最常用的方法。尽管这些方法通过商业软件广泛可用,但它们不是完全自动化的,并且需要人工交互才能应用。此外,PTA被描述为一个逆问题,其解通常是非唯一的,并且可以找到几种模型(井,油藏和边界)适用于类似的压力导数响应。这往往会给使用传统方法选择正确模型带来混乱。这将导致耗时且需要持续的人工交互的多次迭代。我们的方法使用由卷积神经网络(CNN)和长短期记忆(LSTM)层组成的连体神经网络(SNN)架构实现PTA过程的自动化。SNN模型是根据实验设计(DOE)方法创建的模拟实验数据进行训练的,该方法涉及井、储层和边界模型类型中最常见的14种解释场景。在每种模型类型中,对渗透率、水平井长度、表皮系数和到边界的距离等参数进行采样,以计算560种不同的压力导数响应。SNN使用自监督训练策略进行训练,其中正对和负对由训练数据生成。我们使用压缩和扩展等变换来生成试井模型响应的正对和负对。对于给定的试井模型响应,计算每个模型类别中的候选模型的相似性分数,并确定每个类别中的最佳匹配。然后根据相似性分数对这些匹配进行排序,以确定最佳候选对象。实验分析表明,真正的模型类经常出现在排名靠前的类中。当对来自14个解释场景的70个样本进行测试时,该模型对最佳模型推荐的准确率达到93%。排名靠前的试井模型的先验信息,大大减少了分析过程中的人工工作量。这种机器学习(ML)方法可以与任何PTA软件集成,也可以作为解释器系统中的独立应用程序。目前使用SNN和LSTM层的工作可以用来加速检测由井、储层和边界模型的某种组合解释的压力导数响应的过程,并产生较少用户交互的模型。这种方法将有助于解释工程师更快地进行模型识别,以便与来自地球物理、地质、岩石物理、钻井和生产测井等来源的附加信息进行详细整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Leaders Can Shape the Oil & Gas Industry – Accelerating Innovations Through Business & Environmental Intelligent Systems High Performance Friction Reducer for Slickwater Fracturing Applications: Laboratory Study and Field Implementation CO2 Waterless Fracturing and Huff and Puff in Tight Oil Reservoir Switched Reluctance Motor for Electric Submersible Pump Sparse Water Fracture Channel Detection from Subsurface Sensors Via a Smart Orthogonal Matching Pursuit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1