SOLVENCY TEST AS YARDSTICK FOR PRUDENT DIVIDEND DISTRIBUTION: A CROATIAN OUTLOOK

Q3 Social Sciences InterEULawEast Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.22598/IELE.2020.7.2.2
Kristijan Poljanec, Hana Horak
{"title":"SOLVENCY TEST AS YARDSTICK FOR PRUDENT DIVIDEND DISTRIBUTION: A CROATIAN OUTLOOK","authors":"Kristijan Poljanec, Hana Horak","doi":"10.22598/IELE.2020.7.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building their paper around long-standing critics of the EU capital maintenance regime and the distribution rules thereof, the authors consider introducing additional instruments for creditor protection into Croatian company law, where special regard is paid to the ‘solvency test’. Given the scope and aim of the EU Codification Directive, the paper seeks to find out whether and to what extent such a test could be introduced into Croatian law. The paper argues that the EU regime allows the introduction of the solvency test into Croatian law on public limited companies as a distribution test complementary to the two-fold ‘balance sheet test’ leaving, however, entirely to the Croatian legislator to decide about the place of the solvency test in private limited companies. Alongside the examination of legal sources and literature, the authors pursue their research by employing the systematic and teleological analysis of distribution rules under the Croatian Companies’ Act. That act has already introduced the ‘circumstances test’ as a yardstick for the assessment of the validi-ty of the decision to withhold dividend payment. After the introduction, the second part of the paper considers the concept of legal capital and provides an overview of potentially more efficient means of creditor protection. The third part analyses the Croatian legal capital regime, aiming at revisiting it in light of the solvency test. This part examines various solvency tests so as to decide which one could align with the Croatian distribution rules. The fourth part summarizes and concludes the paper.","PeriodicalId":52280,"journal":{"name":"InterEULawEast","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterEULawEast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22598/IELE.2020.7.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building their paper around long-standing critics of the EU capital maintenance regime and the distribution rules thereof, the authors consider introducing additional instruments for creditor protection into Croatian company law, where special regard is paid to the ‘solvency test’. Given the scope and aim of the EU Codification Directive, the paper seeks to find out whether and to what extent such a test could be introduced into Croatian law. The paper argues that the EU regime allows the introduction of the solvency test into Croatian law on public limited companies as a distribution test complementary to the two-fold ‘balance sheet test’ leaving, however, entirely to the Croatian legislator to decide about the place of the solvency test in private limited companies. Alongside the examination of legal sources and literature, the authors pursue their research by employing the systematic and teleological analysis of distribution rules under the Croatian Companies’ Act. That act has already introduced the ‘circumstances test’ as a yardstick for the assessment of the validi-ty of the decision to withhold dividend payment. After the introduction, the second part of the paper considers the concept of legal capital and provides an overview of potentially more efficient means of creditor protection. The third part analyses the Croatian legal capital regime, aiming at revisiting it in light of the solvency test. This part examines various solvency tests so as to decide which one could align with the Croatian distribution rules. The fourth part summarizes and concludes the paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
偿付能力测试作为审慎股息分配的标准:克罗地亚前景
围绕长期以来对欧盟资本维持制度及其分配规则的批评,作者考虑在克罗地亚公司法中引入额外的债权人保护工具,其中特别关注“偿付能力测试”。鉴于《欧盟法典指令》的范围和目的,本文件试图查明克罗地亚法律是否可以采用这种检验,以及在何种程度上可以采用这种检验。本文认为,欧盟制度允许将偿付能力测试引入克罗地亚关于公共有限公司的法律,作为双重“资产负债表测试”的补充分配测试,然而,完全由克罗地亚立法者决定偿付能力测试在私人有限公司中的位置。除了审查法律来源和文献外,作者还通过对克罗地亚公司法下的分配规则进行系统和目的论分析来进行研究。该法案已经引入了“环境测试”,作为评估扣留股息决定有效性的标准。在介绍之后,本文的第二部分考虑了法定资本的概念,并概述了可能更有效的债权人保护手段。第三部分分析了克罗地亚的法定资本制度,旨在根据偿付能力测试对其进行重新审视。本部分审查各种偿付能力测试,以便决定哪一种测试可以符合克罗地亚的分配规则。第四部分对全文进行总结和总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
InterEULawEast
InterEULawEast Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
DYNAMIC INDUSTRIES REQUIRE A DYNAMIC APPROACH TO LAW? ON THE ILLUMINAGRAIL TAKEOVER THE DIGITAL ECONOMY AND LEGAL CHALLENGES DIGITAL RIGHTS IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM REMITTANCES ARE THE MAIN INDICATORS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE WESTERN BALKANS THE IMPACT OF THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND UKRAINE ON MUTUAL TRADE AND UKRAINIAN PORTS CARGO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1