High School Students’ Argumentation Skills: A Study of Sundanese High School Students’ Opinion-forming Skills about Human Cloning Issues

B. Ekanara, Ilma Riksa Isfiani
{"title":"High School Students’ Argumentation Skills: A Study of Sundanese High School Students’ Opinion-forming Skills about Human Cloning Issues","authors":"B. Ekanara, Ilma Riksa Isfiani","doi":"10.24235/sc.educatia.v9i2.7327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science education has progressed very rapidly both in terms of content and skills as learning experiences. This progress must be responded to by every student and their background, including Sundanese people. Cloning is one aspect of science education content that goes along its controversy, so that argumentation skills are very suitable for every student. It is hoped that they will form opinions based on their point of view on the issue. Sundanese people are known to be simple and to keep their ancestral knowledge from generation to generation. Therefore, it will be very interesting to research how they form opinions on the issue of cloning. This study aimed to investigate the argumentation skills of the eleventh-grade students of a Sundanese High School about Human cloning based on gender and cultural habits. This qualitative research probed argumentation skill quality by claim forming and evidence supplying. Forty-four students of the eleventh-grade were given a research instrument with a snowball sampling technique. Students’ worksheet of cloning was used to trawl data of written argumentation skills. Semi-structured interviews encompassed oral argumentation skills data. The family’s gender awareness data were obtained through questionnaires and interviews. Furthermore, this research utilized a data triangulation tool by using field notes. Four-scale rubrics were used to determine students’ argumentation skills with inductive analysis as a tool to examine the data. The results show that most of the research subjects (Sundanese students) can create simple argument can create mentation skills better than written argumentation skills with relatively no significant differences based on gender differences. According to this research finding, several factors influencing Sundanese students' argumentation skills, such as freedom of opinion-forming in family life, students' role in the family, articulating ideas, and cultural influences, are suggestions.","PeriodicalId":33670,"journal":{"name":"Scientiae Educatia Jurnal Pendidikan Sains","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientiae Educatia Jurnal Pendidikan Sains","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v9i2.7327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Science education has progressed very rapidly both in terms of content and skills as learning experiences. This progress must be responded to by every student and their background, including Sundanese people. Cloning is one aspect of science education content that goes along its controversy, so that argumentation skills are very suitable for every student. It is hoped that they will form opinions based on their point of view on the issue. Sundanese people are known to be simple and to keep their ancestral knowledge from generation to generation. Therefore, it will be very interesting to research how they form opinions on the issue of cloning. This study aimed to investigate the argumentation skills of the eleventh-grade students of a Sundanese High School about Human cloning based on gender and cultural habits. This qualitative research probed argumentation skill quality by claim forming and evidence supplying. Forty-four students of the eleventh-grade were given a research instrument with a snowball sampling technique. Students’ worksheet of cloning was used to trawl data of written argumentation skills. Semi-structured interviews encompassed oral argumentation skills data. The family’s gender awareness data were obtained through questionnaires and interviews. Furthermore, this research utilized a data triangulation tool by using field notes. Four-scale rubrics were used to determine students’ argumentation skills with inductive analysis as a tool to examine the data. The results show that most of the research subjects (Sundanese students) can create simple argument can create mentation skills better than written argumentation skills with relatively no significant differences based on gender differences. According to this research finding, several factors influencing Sundanese students' argumentation skills, such as freedom of opinion-forming in family life, students' role in the family, articulating ideas, and cultural influences, are suggestions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高中学生的辩论技巧:Sundanese高中学生关于克隆人问题的意见形成技巧研究
科学教育在内容和作为学习经验的技能方面都取得了非常迅速的进展。这一进步必须得到每个学生及其背景的响应,包括巽他人。克隆是科学教育内容的一个方面,它伴随着争议,所以论证技巧非常适合每个学生。希望他们能根据自己对这个问题的看法形成意见。巽他人以简单而闻名,并将祖传的知识代代相传。因此,研究他们如何就克隆问题形成意见将是非常有趣的。摘要本研究旨在调查巽他高中11年级学生基于性别和文化习惯的克隆人论证能力。本定性研究从主张的形成和证据的提供两方面考察了论证技巧的质量。研究人员给了44名高一学生一个滚雪球取样法的研究仪器。使用学生的克隆作业表来搜集书面论证技能的数据。半结构化访谈包括口头辩论技巧数据。通过问卷调查和访谈获得家庭性别意识数据。此外,本研究利用实地记录的数据三角测量工具。使用四量表的规则来确定学生的论证技巧,归纳分析作为检查数据的工具。结果显示,大多数研究对象(巽他学生)的简单议论文能力和心理议论文能力优于书面议论文能力,性别差异相对不显著。根据本研究发现,影响巽他语学生辩论技巧的几个因素,如家庭生活中意见形成的自由、学生在家庭中的角色、表达想法和文化影响,都是建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reconstruction of Community Knowledge in the Process of Making Potato Dodol Kerinci on the Criteria of Product Halalness Using Ethnoscience Approach Critical Thinking Skills Using Science Technology Religion Engineering Arts and Mathematics (STREAM) Approach on Ecosystem Materials Cognitive Anxiety and Habits of Mind: A Study of the Interrelationships with Biology Learning Outcomes Analysis of Science Generic Skills in Animal Respiration Practicum: Is it Improved Through Guided Inquiry-based Learning? BioMagz with an Approach to Socio-Scientific Issues as a Learning Resource to Learn Environmental Change Materials to Improve Scientific Literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1