Experiments all the way in programmatic design research

Q2 Arts and Humanities Artifact Pub Date : 2014-12-03 DOI:10.14434/ARTIFACT.V3I2.3976
A. Bang, Mette Agger Eriksen
{"title":"Experiments all the way in programmatic design research","authors":"A. Bang, Mette Agger Eriksen","doi":"10.14434/ARTIFACT.V3I2.3976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experiments take various forms, have various purposes, and generate various knowledge; depending on how, when and why they are integrated in a design research study with a programmatic approach. This is what we will argue for throughout this article using examples and experiences from\n our now finalized Ph.D. studies. Reviewing the prevailing literature on research through design the overall argument is that design experiments play a core role both in conducting the research, in theory construction and in knowledge generation across the different design domains and methodological\n directions. However, we did not identify sources that explicitly discuss and operationalize roles and characteristics of design experiments in different stages of programmatic design research. The aim of this article is therefore to outline a (tentative) systematic account of roles and characteristics\n of design experiments. Building upon Schön’s definition of experiments in practice we propose adding to the prevailing understanding of experiments in research through design understanding and operationalizing design experiments (1) as initiators or drivers framing a research programme,\n (2) as ways to reflect on and mature the research programme serving as vehicles for theory construction and knowledge generation and finally (3) as a ‘designerly’ approach to the written knowledge dissemination and clarification of research contributions.","PeriodicalId":36630,"journal":{"name":"Artifact","volume":"1 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artifact","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/ARTIFACT.V3I2.3976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Experiments take various forms, have various purposes, and generate various knowledge; depending on how, when and why they are integrated in a design research study with a programmatic approach. This is what we will argue for throughout this article using examples and experiences from our now finalized Ph.D. studies. Reviewing the prevailing literature on research through design the overall argument is that design experiments play a core role both in conducting the research, in theory construction and in knowledge generation across the different design domains and methodological directions. However, we did not identify sources that explicitly discuss and operationalize roles and characteristics of design experiments in different stages of programmatic design research. The aim of this article is therefore to outline a (tentative) systematic account of roles and characteristics of design experiments. Building upon Schön’s definition of experiments in practice we propose adding to the prevailing understanding of experiments in research through design understanding and operationalizing design experiments (1) as initiators or drivers framing a research programme, (2) as ways to reflect on and mature the research programme serving as vehicles for theory construction and knowledge generation and finally (3) as a ‘designerly’ approach to the written knowledge dissemination and clarification of research contributions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实验在程序化设计研究中一直存在
实验有各种形式,有各种目的,产生各种知识;这取决于如何,何时以及为什么将它们整合到设计研究中,并采用程序化的方法。这就是我们将在本文中使用我们现在完成的博士研究中的例子和经验来论证的。回顾关于通过设计进行研究的主流文献,总体观点是,设计实验在进行研究、理论构建和跨不同设计领域和方法论方向的知识生成方面都起着核心作用。然而,我们没有找到明确讨论和操作设计实验在程序化设计研究的不同阶段的角色和特征的来源。因此,本文的目的是概述设计实验的角色和特征(暂定)系统帐户。基于Schön对实践中实验的定义,我们建议通过设计理解和操作设计实验来增加对研究中实验的普遍理解(1)作为制定研究计划的发起者或驱动者;(2)作为反思和成熟研究计划的方式,作为理论构建和知识生成的工具;最后(3)作为书面知识传播和澄清研究贡献的“设计师式”方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Artifact
Artifact Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
A matter of scales: Experiential evaluation as a scaling device to support a scaling platform in a case of urban design Scale in passing: Re-calibrating narrowness through spatial interventions Scalar trajectories in design: The case of DIY cloth face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic Scaling social innovation: Ownership, documentation, infrastructuring elements and rehearsing new practices Between yarns and electrons: A method for designing electromagnetic expressions in woven smart textiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1