Characterizing Polynomial Time Computability of Rational and Real Functions

W. Gomaa
{"title":"Characterizing Polynomial Time Computability of Rational and Real Functions","authors":"W. Gomaa","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.9.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recursive analysis was introduced by A. Turing [1936], A. Grzegorczyk [1955], and D. Lacombe [1955]. It is based on a discrete mechanical framework that can be used to model computation over the real numbers. In this context the computational complexity of real functions defined over compact domains has been extensively studied. However, much less have been done for other kinds of real functions. This article is divided into two main parts. The first part investigates polynomial time computability of rational functions and the role of continuity in such computation. On the one hand this is interesting for its own sake. On the other hand it provides insights into polynomial time computability of real functions for the latter, in the sense of recursive analysis, is modeled as approximations of rational computations. The main conclusion of this part is that continuity does not play any role in the efficiency of computing rational functions. The second part defines polynomial time computability of arbitrary real functions, characterizes it, and compares it with the corresponding notion over rational functions. Assuming continuity, the main conclusion is that there is a conceptual difference between polynomial time computation over the rationals and the reals manifested by the fact that there are polynomial time computable rational functions whose extensions to the reals are not polynomial time computable and vice versa.","PeriodicalId":88470,"journal":{"name":"Dialogues in cardiovascular medicine : DCM","volume":"129 1","pages":"54-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dialogues in cardiovascular medicine : DCM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.9.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Recursive analysis was introduced by A. Turing [1936], A. Grzegorczyk [1955], and D. Lacombe [1955]. It is based on a discrete mechanical framework that can be used to model computation over the real numbers. In this context the computational complexity of real functions defined over compact domains has been extensively studied. However, much less have been done for other kinds of real functions. This article is divided into two main parts. The first part investigates polynomial time computability of rational functions and the role of continuity in such computation. On the one hand this is interesting for its own sake. On the other hand it provides insights into polynomial time computability of real functions for the latter, in the sense of recursive analysis, is modeled as approximations of rational computations. The main conclusion of this part is that continuity does not play any role in the efficiency of computing rational functions. The second part defines polynomial time computability of arbitrary real functions, characterizes it, and compares it with the corresponding notion over rational functions. Assuming continuity, the main conclusion is that there is a conceptual difference between polynomial time computation over the rationals and the reals manifested by the fact that there are polynomial time computable rational functions whose extensions to the reals are not polynomial time computable and vice versa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有理函数和实函数多项式时间可计算性的表征
递归分析是由A. Turing[1936]、A. Grzegorczyk[1955]和D. Lacombe[1955]提出的。它基于一个离散的力学框架,可以用来模拟实数上的计算。在此背景下,定义在紧定义域上的实函数的计算复杂度得到了广泛的研究。然而,对于其他类型的实际函数所做的工作要少得多。本文主要分为两个部分。第一部分研究有理函数的多项式时间可计算性以及连续性在这种计算中的作用。一方面,这本身就很有趣。另一方面,它提供了对实函数的多项式时间可计算性的见解,后者在递归分析的意义上,被建模为有理计算的近似。这部分的主要结论是连续性对有理函数的计算效率没有任何影响。第二部分定义了任意实数函数的多项式时间可计算性,对其进行了刻画,并与相应的有理数函数的概念进行了比较。假设连续性,主要结论是多项式时间计算在有理数和实数之间存在概念上的区别,这表现在多项式时间可计算的有理函数,其对实数的扩展是不可多项式时间计算的,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Free fall and cellular automata A knowledge representation meta-model for rule-based modelling of signalling networks Generation, Ranking and Unranking of Ordered Trees with Degree Bounds Formalising Confluence in PVS Compositional model checking of concurrent systems, with Petri nets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1